Guangzhou Yangda Knitting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Guangzhou Yangda Knitting Co., Ltd. is a China-based textile supplier located in Guangdong, with a reported factory area of 6,100+㎡ and 20+ staff. The supplier presents a focused product offering in knitted and stretch fabrics, including polyester/rayon, nylon/spandex, tricot, compression activewear fabric, and cool-feeling fabric products. On -related platform credibility, the company shows a 4-year Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, supplier verification, response-time labeling, and a strong on-time delivery rate of 96.5%. Commercially, the supplier has achieved 100+ orders and CN¥202.8K+ transaction value over the past six months, with a 4.9 store rating and 20+ reviews. This indicates a supplier with verified platform presence, moderate transaction validation, and reliable delivery performance. It is most suitable for buyers seeking small-to-medium volume fabric sourcing, sampling flexibility, and relatively low MOQ options. However, data is insufficient regarding full customization, finished product inspection, and detailed factory certifications beyond supplier verification.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Company: Guangzhou Yangda Knitting Co., Ltd.
• Location: Guangdong, China
• Factory area: 6,100+㎡
• Employees: 20+ staff
• Verified supplier: True
• Product scope shown: knitted/stretch fabric products including polyester/rayon fabric, nylon/spandex fabric, tricot fabric, compression activewear knit fabric, and stretch dry fabric.

Elaboration

The supplier has a reported factory area of more than 6,100 square meters, which indicates a tangible production or operating base rather than a purely trading-oriented profile. The employee count of 20+ staff suggests a relatively lean organization. While the factory area is moderate, the staffing scale is not large, which may limit its ability to support highly complex or very large-volume production programs without further capacity confirmation.

The presence of supplier verification strengthens the company profile, as it provides a basic level of third-party or platform-backed credibility. However, the provided data does not include detailed information on production lines, monthly capacity, machinery quantity, quality-control team size, or specific factory audit standards.

Scoring Rationale

Guangzhou Yangda Knitting demonstrates the characteristics of a small-to-medium production supplier with a physical operating base and verified supplier status. The 6,100+㎡ factory area is a positive indicator, but the 20+ staff size suggests that the company should not be classified as a large-scale stable supply chain. Because no detailed production capacity, machinery list, or formal factory certification information is provided, the score should remain in the mid-range rather than the top tier.

Final Score

15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 4 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier: True
• Platform labels: “Response time ≤4h”, “On-time delivery 96.5%”
• Certification / industry labels beyond platform data: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a 4-year Gold Supplier history, which provides a reasonable level of platform credibility. Trade Assurance support is also a meaningful safeguard for buyers, particularly for payment protection and order execution transparency within the platform environment. The supplier verification status further supports legitimacy and reduces basic supplier-screening risk.

The platform labels also indicate operational transparency in response time and delivery performance. However, the provided certification or industry label data is limited. There is no information confirming internationally recognized textile certifications, factory management certifications, environmental certifications, or product compliance standards.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has several important credibility indicators: Gold Supplier status, 4 years of platform history, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status. These are strong platform-level trust signals. However, the Gold Supplier duration is moderate rather than long-term, and certification completeness cannot be confirmed from the data provided. Therefore, the supplier fits the category of having core platform credentials in place, but not a fully comprehensive compliance profile.

Final Score

17 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Orders in past 6 months: 100+
• Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥202.8K+
• Store rating: 4.9
• Reviews: 20+

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded more than 100 orders in the past six months, showing active commercial engagement on the platform. A six-month transaction value of CN¥202.8K+ indicates real buyer activity, though the transaction amount suggests moderate rather than high-volume commercial scale. The 4.9 store rating is strong and indicates positive buyer satisfaction based on available reviews.

The review count of 20+ is useful but not extensive. It provides some customer feedback validation, yet it is not large enough to fully confirm performance stability across a broad buyer base or over many transaction scenarios.

Scoring Rationale

The company shows solid recent platform activity, with 100+ orders and a positive rating of 4.9. These figures support a conclusion of stable small-to-medium business performance. However, the transaction value is not high enough to classify the supplier as a high-volume commercial performer, and the review count remains moderate. Therefore, the supplier receives a strong mid-range score rather than a top-tier score.

Final Score

16 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤4h
• Platform label: “Response time ≤4h”
• Full Customization: Insufficient Data
• Customization capability details: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s stated response time of within four hours is positive and indicates acceptable communication efficiency for online sourcing. This level of responsiveness is suitable for routine inquiries, sample discussions, MOQ confirmation, pricing negotiation, and order follow-up.

However, there is no provided data confirming whether the supplier supports Full Customization. There is also no information about OEM/ODM capability, custom fabric development, color matching, finishing options, packaging customization, or technical support processes. As a result, service capability can only be evaluated based on communication responsiveness, not full buyer-service depth.

Scoring Rationale

The response time is reasonable but does not meet the highest service benchmark of response within one hour. More importantly, customization capacity is not confirmed. Since the scoring dimension includes both response speed and customization capability, the lack of customization data limits the score. The supplier can be considered operationally responsive, but not yet proven as a strong customization partner.

Final Score

6 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 96.5%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time delivery rate of 96.5% is strong. According to the scoring framework, a delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the highest scoring band. This suggests that the supplier has demonstrated reliable order fulfillment performance on the platform within the measured period.

No additional data is provided regarding average lead time, urgent-order handling, logistics partners, delay dispute history, or delivery performance by order size. Therefore, the evaluation is based strictly on the reported on-time delivery rate.

Scoring Rationale

A 96.5% on-time delivery rate is a clear strength and supports a high delivery-performance score. Although more detailed delivery data would improve risk assessment, the provided metric is sufficient to classify this supplier as highly reliable in delivery execution.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Store rating: 4.9
• Reviews: 20+
• Verified supplier: True
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
• Factory Verification: True, based on provided “Verified supplier” data
• Detailed quality certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s 4.9 store rating is a positive customer-feedback signal. Combined with 20+ reviews, it indicates that buyers have generally reported satisfactory experiences. Supplier verification also contributes to basic confidence in the company’s operational legitimacy.

However, the available data does not confirm whether the supplier provides Finished Product Inspection. There is also no information on quality-control procedures, fabric testing standards, defect rate, inspection reports, lab testing, or textile compliance certifications. The review count, while positive, is still relatively limited and does not represent a large base of customer feedback.

Scoring Rationale

The high store rating supports a favorable quality perception, and the verified supplier status adds credibility. However, the limited review volume and missing finished product inspection data prevent a top-tier quality score. The supplier appears to have acceptable quality feedback from existing buyers, but the quality assurance system is not fully evidenced in the provided data.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional Cooperation Recommended

Guangzhou Yangda Knitting Co., Ltd. is recommended for buyers seeking verified platform suppliers for knitted and stretch fabric sourcing, especially where moderate order quantities, sampling flexibility, and reliable delivery are important. The supplier is suitable for small-to-medium buyers, fabric traders, apparel developers, and activewear or stretch-fabric sourcing teams requiring products within the provided fabric categories.

Main strengths include: - Verified supplier status
- 4-year Gold Supplier history
- Trade Assurance support
- Strong on-time delivery rate of 96.5%
- Good store rating of 4.9
- 100+ orders in the past six months
- Flexible MOQ shown in some listings, including 1 meter and 10 meters for certain products

Main risks include: - Employee scale is relatively small at 20+ staff
- Full Customization capability: Insufficient Data
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Detailed factory certifications or textile compliance certifications: Insufficient Data
- Review count is positive but still limited at 20+

Growth potential:
The supplier shows stable platform activity and reliable delivery performance. If it can provide stronger evidence of quality-control systems, customization capability, factory audit documents, and product compliance certifications, its suitability for larger or more quality-sensitive procurement programs would improve. For now, cooperation is advisable through sample orders, small-batch trial orders, and Trade Assurance-backed transactions before scaling to larger procurement volumes.