Everich And Tomic Housewares Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Supplier Evaluation Report: Everich And Tomic Housewares Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Everich And Tomic Housewares Co., Ltd. is a Zhejiang-based Chinese housewares supplier with a strong manufacturing footprint, reporting a factory area of over 100,000㎡ and more than 1,600 staff. The supplier is positioned as a large-scale manufacturer mainly offering stainless steel tumblers, water bottles, and customized drinkware-related products with very low listed MOQs of 2 pieces across sampled products. On , the company shows strong platform credibility, including 9 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and a 94.6% on-time delivery rate. Its recent business performance is also solid, with 100+ orders and CN¥3M+ transaction value in the past six months, supported by a 4.9 store rating and 60+ reviews. This supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking scalable drinkware sourcing, low-MOQ trial orders, and suppliers with established platform transaction history. Key limitations are the lack of disclosed finished product inspection data and limited detailed certification information.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Factory location: Zhejiang, China
• Factory area: 100,000+㎡
• Employees: 1,600+ staff
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates a clearly large operational base. A factory area exceeding 100,000㎡ and a workforce of more than 1,600 staff indicate significant production infrastructure and organizational capacity. These figures suggest the company is better positioned for volume production than small or workshop-style suppliers. The verified supplier status further supports the credibility of its stated operational scale.

However, the provided data does not include detailed information on annual production capacity, number of production lines, machinery, factory audit reports, or specific factory management certifications. Therefore, while the scale is clearly strong, the assessment cannot confirm the full depth of its manufacturing system beyond the disclosed area, staffing, and verification status.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier fits the profile of a large-scale and stable manufacturing entity based on its factory size and employee count. The verified supplier status strengthens confidence in the company’s physical and operational presence. A near-top score is justified, but a perfect score is not assigned because the data does not provide detailed production capacity, audit documents, or named factory certifications.

Final Score

19 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 9 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier: True
• Certification / platform labels:
• Low MOQ for customization
• Response time ≤6h
• On-time delivery 94.6%

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong platform profile. A 9-year Gold Supplier history indicates long-term platform presence and operational continuity. Trade Assurance availability provides buyers with additional transaction protection, while verified supplier status adds credibility to the company profile. The listed platform labels also support practical sourcing considerations, especially low-MOQ customization and documented delivery performance.

That said, the data only provides platform-related labels and does not disclose independent product certifications, factory certifications, social compliance audits, or international quality management certifications. Therefore, the compliance credibility is strong from a platform perspective, but broader certification completeness cannot be fully confirmed.

Scoring Rationale

The combination of 9 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status represents a mature and credible profile. The supplier meets the standard for a highly credible platform-backed supplier. The score is slightly below full marks because certification depth outside platform verification is not provided.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Orders in past 6 months: 100+
• Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥3M+
• Store rating: 4.9
• Reviews: 60+

Elaboration

The supplier shows solid recent commercial activity. More than 100 orders and CN¥3M+ transaction value in the past six months indicate that the company has active buyer demand and proven transaction execution on the platform. The 4.9 store rating is strong and suggests generally positive buyer satisfaction. The presence of 60+ reviews provides a meaningful feedback base, although it is not extremely large relative to the supplier’s apparent scale.

The data indicates stable business performance rather than limited or unverified trading history. However, since the review count is moderate and the transaction data is limited to the past six months, the assessment cannot fully evaluate long-term sales consistency beyond the disclosed period.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates strong commercial validation through recent order volume, transaction value, and high store rating. A high score is appropriate because the company has both transaction scale and positive customer feedback. The score is not the maximum because the review volume, while useful, is not exceptionally high, and longer-term transaction performance is not provided.

Final Score

18 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤6h
• Platform label: Low MOQ for customization
• Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of ≤6 hours indicates a reasonable level of communication responsiveness for international procurement. The “Low MOQ for customization” label suggests that the supplier can support some level of customization at relatively accessible order quantities. This is useful for buyers who need sample runs, trial orders, small-batch customization, or early-stage product testing.

However, the provided data does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization, such as full structural design, mold development, packaging engineering, or deep OEM/ODM services. Therefore, the service capability can be considered good for standard communication and low-MOQ customization, but the depth of customization support remains unverified.

Scoring Rationale

The response time is acceptable but not at the strongest level defined by the scoring system, which requires response time of ≤1 hour for the highest range. The supplier has evidence of basic customization support, but Full Customization is not confirmed. Therefore, a mid-to-good score is justified.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 94.6%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time delivery rate of 94.6% is above the 90% benchmark for strong delivery performance. This indicates that the supplier has a reliable delivery record on the platform and is generally capable of fulfilling orders according to agreed timelines.

For procurement teams, this level of delivery performance is positive, especially when sourcing physical consumer goods where shipping schedules, seasonal demand, and inventory planning are important. However, the data does not provide details on average lead time, peak season capacity, logistics methods, or historical delay causes.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 point range. The supplier’s 94.6% performance is strong and supports confidence in delivery reliability. A score of 9 is assigned because the rate is high, though not close enough to perfect to justify the maximum score, and supporting delivery details are limited.

Final Score

9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Store rating: 4.9
• Reviews: 60+
• Verified supplier: True
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
• Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong store rating of 4.9, which indicates positive customer feedback. The 60+ reviews provide a useful basis for evaluating buyer satisfaction, though the review volume is moderate rather than extensive. Verified supplier status supports a basic level of confidence in the supplier’s company and factory profile.

However, the data does not confirm whether the supplier has Finished Product Inspection, formal QC checkpoints, third-party inspection support, product testing systems, or named quality certifications. As a result, while customer feedback appears positive, the quality assurance system cannot be fully assessed from the provided information.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier deserves a good score because of its high store rating, available review base, and verified supplier status. However, a top-tier quality score requires both strong customer feedback and clearly documented quality assurance mechanisms such as Finished Product Inspection or equivalent systems. Since Finished Product Inspection is not provided, the score remains in the good but not excellent range.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for cooperation, especially for drinkware buyers seeking scalable supply, low-MOQ trial orders, and platform-protected transactions.

Everich And Tomic Housewares Co., Ltd. shows strong supplier fundamentals, including large factory scale, 1,600+ staff, 9 years of Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and strong recent transaction performance. Its 94.6% on-time delivery rate and 4.9 store rating further support its suitability as a reliable sourcing option.

Suitable customer types:
- Importers and distributors sourcing stainless steel tumblers and water bottles
- Brands requiring low-MOQ customized drinkware trials
- Buyers seeking Trade Assurance protection
- Procurement teams looking for suppliers with proven platform transaction history

Main risks:
- Finished Product Inspection information is not provided
- Full Customization capability is not confirmed
- Specific product certifications, factory audit reports, and quality system certifications are not disclosed
- Review count is useful but not large enough to fully validate long-term quality consistency

Growth potential:
The supplier has strong growth potential due to its large production base, established platform credibility, recent transaction volume, and low-MOQ customization positioning. Further verification of quality control procedures, inspection standards, and certification documents is recommended before placing large-volume or brand-sensitive orders.