zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Tianck Medical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Tianck Medical Co., Ltd. is a Guangdong-based Chinese supplier with a verified factory profile, 2,600+㎡ factory area, and 90+ staff. Based on the provided data, the company appears to be a small-to-mid-sized manufacturer or supplier focused on medical consumable-related products, with listed products covering IBP-related supplies, anesthesia/ICU consumables, and disposable medical supplies. Its strongest advantages are platform credibility and transaction validation: it has 9 years as an Gold Supplier, supports Trade Assurance, records 100+ orders and CN¥3M+ transaction value over the past six months, and maintains a 4.9 store rating. Delivery performance is also strong, with a 98.3% on-time dispatch rate. However, review volume is limited at only 10 reviews, and there is no provided evidence of full customization, international medical certifications, production capacity, or detailed quality defect data. Overall, this supplier is suitable for buyers seeking verified, transaction-proven medical consumable suppliers with moderate scale and reliable delivery.

Tianck Medical Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Company: Tianck Medical Co., Ltd.
  • Location: Guangdong, China
  • Factory area: 2,600+㎡
  • Employees: 90+ staff
  • Verified supplier/factory audit status: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a clearly stated physical factory scale and workforce size. A 2,600+㎡ facility with 90+ employees indicates an operating production or supply organization with basic manufacturing and fulfillment capability. The verified supplier/factory audit status strengthens its credibility compared with suppliers without any factory verification. However, the available data does not include annual production capacity, number of production lines, equipment details, warehouse capacity, export markets, or major customer references. These missing elements limit the ability to classify the supplier as a large-scale or highly industrialized manufacturer.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates a stable basic production foundation through its factory area, staff size, and verified supplier status. However, the scale is not large enough, based on the provided data, to be considered a large-scale supply chain operation. The company fits best into a small-to-medium factory profile with credible baseline operational capability. The lack of production capacity data prevents a higher score.

Final Score

15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 9 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier/factory status: True
  • Platform/industry tags:
  • Finished product inspection
  • ODM service available
  • Minor customization
  • Response time ≤5h

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong platform profile. A 9-year Gold Supplier history indicates long-term platform presence, while Trade Assurance provides buyers with transaction protection. The verified supplier/factory status adds another layer of platform credibility. The presence of “Finished product inspection” also supports a basic compliance and quality-control framework. However, the provided data does not include internationally recognized medical certifications, such as ISO or product-specific regulatory approvals. Therefore, compliance credibility is strong from a platform perspective, but external certification depth is Insufficient Data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has most of the core credibility indicators expected from a reliable supplier: long Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance, verified status, and inspection-related platform tags. The only reason it does not receive a perfect score is the absence of detailed third-party medical, regulatory, or factory management certifications in the provided information.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in past 6 months: 100+
  • Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥3M+
  • Store rating: 4.9
  • Number of reviews: 10

Elaboration

The supplier shows meaningful recent commercial activity, with more than 100 orders and over CN¥3 million in transaction value within the past six months. These figures indicate that the company has active market demand and practical transaction experience. The 4.9 store rating is strong and suggests positive buyer satisfaction among recorded reviews. However, the review count is only 10, which is relatively limited compared with the order count. This means the rating is positive but based on a small visible feedback sample.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier performs well in transaction volume and order activity, which provides solid commercial validation. The high rating supports buyer satisfaction, but the small number of reviews reduces confidence in the representativeness of the score. As a result, the business performance is assessed as strong but not at the highest level.

Final Score

17 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤5h
  • Platform tag: ODM service available
  • Platform tag: Minor customization
  • Full Customization: Insufficient Data / Not provided

Elaboration

The supplier provides a stated response time of within 5 hours, which is acceptable for international sourcing communication but does not meet the strongest benchmark of response within 1 hour. The presence of ODM service and minor customization indicates that the supplier can support some level of product adaptation or buyer-specific requirements. However, there is no provided evidence of full customization capability, engineering support depth, multilingual account management, after-sales service process, or dedicated project management structure.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has adequate service capability for standard procurement and basic customization needs. The response time is reasonable, and ODM/minor customization support adds value for buyers needing limited product adaptation. However, because response speed is not within 1 hour and full customization is not confirmed, the score remains in the mid-to-good range rather than excellent.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time dispatch rate: 98.3%

Elaboration

A 98.3% on-time dispatch rate is a strong delivery indicator. It suggests that the supplier is generally able to meet shipment timelines reliably. For procurement teams, especially those managing replenishment cycles or medical consumable inventory, this level of dispatch performance is a positive operational signal. However, the provided data does not include average lead time, export logistics capability, peak-season performance, or historical delay reasons.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time dispatch rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. At 98.3%, the supplier demonstrates excellent dispatch reliability based on the available data. The absence of deeper logistics data prevents additional qualitative conclusions, but the dispatch metric itself is strong.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.9
  • Number of reviews: 10
  • Finished Product Inspection: True, based on platform tag
  • Factory Verification: True
  • Additional medical or product certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a high store rating of 4.9, which is a positive quality and customer satisfaction signal. The “Finished product inspection” tag indicates that some form of final product checking is available. Factory verification also supports confidence in the supplier’s physical and operational presence. However, the feedback base is limited, with only 10 reviews. In addition, no specific defect rate, return rate, inspection pass rate, quality management certification, or medical regulatory certification is provided.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has good visible quality indicators: high rating, finished product inspection, and verified factory status. These factors support a favorable quality assessment. However, the limited review count and lack of detailed quality-control or regulatory certification data prevent the supplier from being classified as having a fully proven quality assurance system.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 15 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 19 / 20
Business Performance 17 / 20
Service Capability 7 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 16 / 20
Total Score 84 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

Tianck Medical Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers looking for a verified supplier with stable transaction history, strong platform credibility, reliable delivery performance, and basic customization capability. It is particularly appropriate for small-to-medium procurement programs, trial orders, distributor sourcing, and buyers seeking medical consumable-related products with moderate MOQ requirements.

Suitable customer types: - Buyers requiring Trade Assurance protection
- Importers or distributors seeking transaction-proven suppliers
- Customers needing ODM or minor customization
- Buyers prioritizing reliable dispatch performance

Main risk points: - Limited review count: only 10 reviews despite 100+ recent orders
- No provided evidence of full customization capability
- No provided international medical certifications or regulatory approvals
- No detailed production capacity, defect rate, or inspection pass-rate data

Growth potential: The supplier shows strong potential due to its 9-year Gold Supplier history, verified factory status, CN¥3M+ recent transaction volume, and 98.3% on-time dispatch rate. If it can provide more complete certification documents, detailed quality-control records, and stronger customer feedback volume, it could become a more competitive long-term sourcing partner.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Hochey Medical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hochey Medical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Mecan Medical Limited Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Mecan Medical Limited Supplier Evaluation
Icen Medical Equipment Limited Supplier Evaluation
Icen Medical Equipment Limited Supplier Evaluation
Kangfu Medical Equipment Factory Supplier Evaluation
Kangfu Medical Equipment Factory Supplier Evaluation
Xigu Medical (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xigu Medical (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Amsino Medical (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Amsino Medical (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Noval Medical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Noval Medical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fushikang Medical Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fushikang Medical Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Chinaherbs Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Chinaherbs Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Xinhe Medical Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Xinhe Medical Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jining Herta Medical Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jining Herta Medical Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hengshui Fengyu Medical Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hengshui Fengyu Medical Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cangzhou Fukang Medical Supplies Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cangzhou Fukang Medical Supplies Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Flower Medical Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Flower Medical Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hengshui Haoshen Medical Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hengshui Haoshen Medical Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Umy Medical Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Umy Medical Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Fushan Medical Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Fushan Medical Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Jinguang Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Jinguang Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Meilan Medical Devices Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Meilan Medical Devices Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Borui Digital Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Borui Digital Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Foshan Youhang Rattan Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Youhang Rattan Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Wingoo Anime Foods Corporation Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Wingoo Anime Foods Corporation Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Galaxy Fuse Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Galaxy Fuse Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou East World Automation Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou East World Automation Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Mengtian Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Mengtian Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Jianyi Shoes Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Jianyi Shoes Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Huzhou Dayou Plastic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Huzhou Dayou Plastic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hefei Opek Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hefei Opek Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Chinaherbs Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Chinaherbs Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Xinyiqiang Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Xinyiqiang Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ruian Suoyin Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ruian Suoyin Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Jiupo Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Jiupo Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Yongxing Special Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Yongxing Special Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Longdai Environmental Protection Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Longdai Environmental Protection Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xi'An Toption Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xi'An Toption Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Amsino Medical (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Amsino Medical (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Deson Insulated Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Deson Insulated Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Jianna Household Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Jianna Household Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanjing Teyun Machinery Manufacture Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanjing Teyun Machinery Manufacture Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Keering Imp.& Exp. Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Keering Imp.& Exp. Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026