zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Shaanxi Chinaherbs Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Shaanxi Chinaherbs Medical Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Shaanxi, with a reported factory area of 1,800+ m² and 60+ staff. Based on the provided data, the company appears to be a small-to-medium scale supplier with verified supplier status, active platform credibility, and measurable recent commercial performance. Its listed products are mainly herbal tea, health herbal products, private label skin care, and related packaged herbal wellness items, with relatively low MOQs of around 100 packs, bags, pieces, or boxes depending on the product. The supplier has been an Gold Supplier for 4 years, supports Trade Assurance, and carries tags including warranty availability, low MOQ for customization, and finished product inspection. Business activity is relatively solid, with 300+ orders and CN¥1M+ transaction value over the past six months. This supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking moderate-volume herbal wellness or private label products with low MOQ flexibility, though further verification of regulatory compliance, product certifications, and full customization capability is required.

Shaanxi Chinaherbs Medical Technology Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Company name: Shaanxi Chinaherbs Medical Technology Co., Ltd.
  • Country/Region: China, Shaanxi Province
  • Factory area: 1,800+ m²
  • Employees: 60+ staff
  • Verified supplier/factory audit status: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a defined physical production base with a factory area exceeding 1,800 m² and more than 60 staff. This indicates that the company is not merely a trading profile with no visible production footprint. The presence of verified supplier status adds credibility to the existence and basic operating condition of the company.

However, compared with large-scale manufacturers, the available data suggests a moderate or small-to-medium production scale rather than a large industrial facility. The factory size and workforce are sufficient for basic production and order fulfillment, particularly for low-MOQ packaged herbal products, but there is no provided evidence of large-scale automated production lines, multiple factories, advanced manufacturing capacity, or internationally recognized factory certifications.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates basic and credible production capability through its factory area, employee count, and verified supplier status. The scale is stronger than a very small workshop but does not reach the level of a large-scale, highly integrated supply chain manufacturer. Since the factory area is 1,800+ m² and the workforce is 60+ staff, the company fits best into the small-to-medium manufacturing category with stable basic production capacity.

Final Score

15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 4 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Certification/industry tags:
  • Warranty available
  • Low MOQ for customization
  • Finished product inspection

Elaboration

The supplier has a relatively complete platform credibility profile. A 4-year Gold Supplier history indicates that the company has maintained a continuous presence on the platform for several years. Trade Assurance support provides buyers with an additional transaction protection mechanism. Verified supplier status further strengthens platform credibility.

The listed platform tags also provide useful compliance-related signals, especially “Finished product inspection,” which is relevant to quality control. “Warranty available” provides an additional service-related assurance, while “Low MOQ for customization” supports flexible procurement. However, no detailed third-party product certifications, regulatory approvals, food safety certificates, GMP, ISO, organic certification, or export compliance documents are provided in the dataset. Therefore, compliance credibility is positive at the platform level, but product-level certification completeness remains Insufficient Data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier performs well in platform credibility because it combines Gold Supplier status, 4 years of membership, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, and several useful platform tags. However, the Gold Supplier duration is moderate rather than very long, and the provided data does not include detailed product or factory management certifications beyond platform labels. Therefore, the supplier should be scored in the upper-middle range rather than the maximum range.

Final Score

17 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 300+
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥1M+
  • Store rating: 4.7
  • Reviews: 90+

Elaboration

The supplier has demonstrated active recent business performance. More than 300 orders within six months indicates consistent buyer activity and a meaningful transaction record. A transaction value above CN¥1M over the same period suggests that the supplier has handled a reasonable commercial volume rather than only sample-level sales.

The store rating of 4.7 is positive and indicates generally satisfactory buyer feedback. The review count of 90+ gives the rating some reliability, although it is not a very large review base. Overall, the combination of order count, transaction value, rating, and review volume suggests that the supplier has been commercially validated by the marketplace to a moderate-to-strong degree.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier’s 300+ orders and CN¥1M+ transaction amount over six months represent solid business activity. The 4.7 rating is favorable, and 90+ reviews provide a reasonable feedback base. While the performance is strong, the data does not indicate extremely high transaction volume, very large order counts, or exceptionally large review numbers. Therefore, the supplier deserves a high score but not a perfect score.

Final Score

18 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤3h
  • Customization-related tag: Low MOQ for customization
  • Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s stated communication response time of no more than 3 hours is acceptable for international sourcing communication. It is not within the strongest category of ≤1 hour, but it still indicates a relatively responsive service process.

The platform tag “Low MOQ for customization” suggests that the supplier may support some level of customization with relatively accessible order quantities. However, the dataset does not explicitly confirm “Full Customization.” Therefore, it is not appropriate to assume advanced customization capabilities such as formula development, packaging design, private label expansion, or fully customized product development beyond the provided information.

Scoring Rationale

The response time is commercially acceptable and supports normal procurement communication. The low MOQ customization tag is positive, especially for small and medium buyers or trial orders. However, because Full Customization is not confirmed and the response speed is ≤3h rather than ≤1h, the service capability should be assessed as good but not excellent.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time shipment rate: 98.4%

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 98.4% on-time shipment rate, which is a strong delivery performance indicator. Based on the provided scoring rule, any on-time shipment rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 point range.

A rate of 98.4% suggests that the supplier has demonstrated strong delivery reliability on the platform. This is particularly important for buyers placing repeat orders, seasonal promotional purchases, or small-to-medium batches where delays can disrupt sales planning.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier’s on-time shipment rate is well above the 90% threshold and close to full reliability based on the available metric. Since the dataset does not provide additional negative delivery indicators, the supplier qualifies for the top scoring range in this dimension.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.7
  • Review count: 90+
  • Finished product inspection: True
  • Verified supplier/factory verification: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a favorable store rating of 4.7, supported by more than 90 reviews. This indicates generally positive buyer satisfaction, although the number of reviews is moderate rather than extensive.

The presence of “Finished product inspection” is an important quality-related platform tag, suggesting that final goods inspection is part of the supplier’s quality assurance profile. Verified supplier status further supports credibility from a supplier verification perspective. However, the provided data does not include specific product test reports, batch inspection standards, third-party laboratory testing, food safety certifications, GMP certification, ISO certification, or export regulatory documents. For herbal or wellness-related products, such missing quality and compliance documents may be important depending on the buyer’s target market.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a strong quality and feedback foundation through a good store rating, reasonable review count, finished product inspection, and verification status. However, the review volume is not large enough to be considered extensive, and no detailed product-level quality certifications are provided. As a result, the supplier should receive a strong but not maximum score.

Final Score

17 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 15 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 17 / 20
Business Performance 18 / 20
Service Capability 7 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 17 / 20
Total Score 84 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

Shaanxi Chinaherbs Medical Technology Co., Ltd. shows a solid overall supplier profile with verified supplier status, 4 years of Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, 300+ orders in the past six months, CN¥1M+ recent transaction value, a 4.7 store rating, and a strong 98.4% on-time shipment rate. These indicators support cooperation for buyers seeking low-to-medium volume procurement of herbal tea, wellness herbal products, and related private label-style packaged goods.

Suitable customer types:
- Small and medium-sized buyers seeking low MOQ orders
- E-commerce sellers testing herbal wellness product categories
- Buyers requiring Trade Assurance-supported transactions
- Brands looking for suppliers with basic customization flexibility, subject to further confirmation

Main risk points:
- Full Customization capability is Insufficient Data
- Product-level certifications and regulatory compliance documents are Insufficient Data
- No detailed evidence of GMP, ISO, food safety certification, organic certification, or export-market compliance is provided
- Factory scale is moderate, not clearly a large-scale production base

Growth potential:
The supplier has positive platform activity, stable recent order performance, and strong delivery reliability. If it can provide stronger documentation on product testing, regulatory compliance, and advanced customization capability, it may become more suitable for larger buyers and more compliance-sensitive markets.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Shaanxi Ansen Medical Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Ansen Medical Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Airmext Technology Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Airmext Technology Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Shengdi Will Doors And Windows Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Shengdi Will Doors And Windows Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Jinguang Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Jinguang Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Pinheng Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Pinheng Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Voten Medical Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Voten Medical Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Caremed Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Caremed Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Aide Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Aide Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Aupcon Medical Technology (Wuxi) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Aupcon Medical Technology (Wuxi) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Kangquan Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Kangquan Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Meiji Medical Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Meiji Medical Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Fomos Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Fomos Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Aicor Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Aicor Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Daxia Medical Technology (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Daxia Medical Technology (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Rainwood Biotech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Rainwood Biotech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Saiyang Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Saiyang Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Fullstar Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Fullstar Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Shunchengtian Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Shunchengtian Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Lvlai Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Lvlai Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Tianwen Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Tianwen Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Shandong Keju Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Keju Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan City Xishang Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan City Xishang Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Sunbright Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Sunbright Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huimin County Chaozhan Chemical Fiber Rope Net Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huimin County Chaozhan Chemical Fiber Rope Net Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chang Zhou Ncyclebike Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chang Zhou Ncyclebike Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Hongjie International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Hongjie International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Anka Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Anka Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jieyang Rongcheng District Good Good Wear Shoes Factory Supplier Evaluation
Jieyang Rongcheng District Good Good Wear Shoes Factory Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Zemo Jewelry Company Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Zemo Jewelry Company Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Garfield Home Furnishing Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Garfield Home Furnishing Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Jiangmen Hehuan Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangmen Hehuan Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dratec Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dratec Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Miningwell Supply Chain Management Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Miningwell Supply Chain Management Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Wei Xin Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Wei Xin Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jining Dongcheng Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jining Dongcheng Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Qixiang Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Qixiang Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yangzhou Whanlong Electric Vehicle Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yangzhou Whanlong Electric Vehicle Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Ruize Import & Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Ruize Import & Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Chunhui Water-Saving Irrigation Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Chunhui Water-Saving Irrigation Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Hicen Tools (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hicen Tools (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026