zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Jining Dongcheng Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Jining Dongcheng Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Shandong, with a reported factory area of 6,000+㎡, 40+ staff, and verified supplier status. The company appears to focus on compact agricultural machinery and tractor-related products, with listed models ranging from 15HP to 50HP and low minimum order quantities of 1 set. Its platform profile shows 3 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, finished product inspection, warranty availability, and an on-time delivery rate of 90.9%.

From a procurement perspective, the supplier demonstrates basic-to-moderate manufacturing capability, credible platform compliance, and acceptable delivery performance. However, commercial validation remains limited, with only 10+ orders and 1 customer review in the past six months despite a 5.0 store rating. This supplier is more suitable for small to medium-sized buyers, trial orders, distributors testing compact tractor demand, or buyers requiring low-MOQ agricultural machinery procurement. Larger-volume buyers should conduct additional due diligence before scaling cooperation.

Jining Dongcheng Industry And Trade Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — Final Score: 14/20

Basis

  • Company name: Jining Dongcheng Industry And Trade Co., Ltd.
  • Country/region: China, Shandong
  • Factory area: 6,000+㎡
  • Employees: 40+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a physical manufacturing base with a reported factory area exceeding 6,000㎡ and more than 40 employees. This indicates that the company has a tangible production setup rather than operating only as a trading storefront. The verified supplier status further supports the existence of a certain level of operational infrastructure.

However, the employee count of 40+ suggests a small to medium-sized operation rather than a large-scale industrial manufacturer. The available data does not provide annual production capacity, number of production lines, machinery details, export volume, or factory audit reports beyond the verified supplier status.

Scoring Rationale

The company shows basic and credible production capability supported by factory area, staffing, and supplier verification. However, the scale is not large enough to be assessed as a high-capacity supply chain provider. The lack of detailed production capacity data also limits confidence in its ability to handle large-volume or highly complex procurement programs.

Final Score

14/20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — Final Score: 16/20

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 3 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Certification/industry labels:
  • Warranty available
  • Finished product inspection
  • On-time delivery 90.9%
  • Response time ≤2h
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a relatively complete platform credibility profile. It is a Gold Supplier with 3 years of membership and supports Trade Assurance, which provides buyers with a basic transaction protection mechanism. The verified supplier status also strengthens its credibility from a platform-compliance perspective.

The listed platform labels are commercially useful, particularly finished product inspection, warranty availability, and on-time delivery tracking. These indicators suggest that the supplier has some documented service and quality-control commitments on the platform.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier meets several important compliance and credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, verification, and multiple operational labels. However, the Gold Supplier history is 3 years, which is acceptable but not long enough to be considered highly mature or long-established on the platform. No additional third-party certifications or industry-specific compliance documents are provided in the data.

Final Score

16/20

3. Business Performance — Final Score: 12/20

Basis

  • Orders in past 6 months: 10+
  • Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥270.4K+
  • Store rating: 5.0
  • Number of reviews: 1

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded business activity on the platform, with more than 10 orders and over CN¥270.4K in transaction value during the past six months. This indicates that the supplier has generated real commercial transactions rather than having no sales record.

However, the order volume remains relatively low, and the review count is extremely limited at only 1 review. Although the store rating is 5.0, the reliability of this rating is constrained by the very small review base. The transaction amount is meaningful but not sufficient to demonstrate high-volume or broad-market validation.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows some commercial traction, but the available business performance data does not indicate strong market depth. The low review count is a major limitation because it reduces the reliability of the 5.0 rating. The 10+ order count suggests early or moderate platform activity rather than a highly proven supplier with extensive buyer validation.

Final Score

12/20

4. Service Capability — Final Score: 7/10

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤2h
  • Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of ≤2 hours is a positive service indicator. This suggests that the supplier can respond within a commercially acceptable timeframe, which is important for quotation requests, specification clarification, order follow-up, and after-sales communication.

However, the data does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization. No information is provided regarding OEM, ODM, design customization, private labeling, engineering modification, or configuration customization. Therefore, the supplier’s customization capability cannot be fully evaluated.

Scoring Rationale

The response speed is good, but it does not reach the strongest benchmark of ≤1 hour. In addition, the lack of confirmed customization capability prevents a higher service score. The supplier appears suitable for standard product inquiries and normal communication, but its ability to support more complex custom procurement requirements remains unverified.

Final Score

7/10

5. Delivery Performance — Final Score: 9/10

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 90.9%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is 90.9%, which places it above the 90% threshold. This is a positive delivery indicator and suggests that the supplier has generally been able to meet agreed dispatch timelines on the platform.

For machinery procurement, delivery reliability is especially important because delays may affect seasonal agricultural use, distributor planning, and downstream project schedules. Based on the provided data, the supplier demonstrates strong delivery performance.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring rule, suppliers with an on-time delivery rate above 90% fall into the 9–10 point range. Since the supplier’s rate is 90.9%, it qualifies for a strong score, though not the maximum because the rate is only slightly above the 90% threshold.

Final Score

9/10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — Final Score: 14/20

Basis

  • Store rating: 5.0
  • Review count: 1
  • Finished product inspection: Yes
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Warranty available: Yes

Elaboration

The supplier has several positive quality-related indicators. The presence of finished product inspection suggests that products undergo some level of inspection before shipment. Warranty availability is also a useful buyer-protection signal, particularly for machinery products. Verified supplier status further supports a basic level of operational credibility.

However, customer feedback data is very limited. The store rating is 5.0, but it is based on only 1 review, which is insufficient to establish a reliable pattern of buyer satisfaction. There is also no provided information on defect rates, inspection standards, quality certifications, after-sales claim records, or detailed product testing procedures.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has basic quality assurance indicators, including finished product inspection and warranty availability. However, the very small review base prevents the quality performance from being considered strongly validated by customers. The supplier deserves a moderate score because quality mechanisms exist, but customer feedback depth is insufficient.

Final Score

14/20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 14/20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 16/20
Business Performance 12/20
Service Capability 7/10
Delivery Performance 9/10
Quality & Customer Feedback 14/20
Total Score 72/100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional Cooperation Recommended

Jining Dongcheng Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking compact agricultural machinery or tractor-related products with low MOQ requirements. The supplier is especially appropriate for small to medium-sized importers, local machinery dealers, trial procurement buyers, and buyers who want to test demand before placing larger orders.

The supplier’s main strengths are its verified supplier status, 3-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, finished product inspection label, warranty availability, and strong on-time delivery rate of 90.9%. These factors provide a reasonable foundation for initial cooperation.

The main risks are limited business validation, only 10+ recent orders, and just 1 customer review. The company also has only 40+ staff, so large-volume procurement capacity is not fully proven. Full customization capability is also Insufficient Data.

For procurement execution, it is advisable to begin with a sample order or small trial order, confirm technical specifications in writing, use Trade Assurance, request pre-shipment inspection, and verify warranty terms before scaling order volume. The supplier shows growth potential, but larger buyers should conduct additional factory and quality due diligence before long-term procurement commitment.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Jining Tianjiu Industry & Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jining Tianjiu Industry & Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jining Haide International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jining Haide International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jining Excellent Horse Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jining Excellent Horse Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jining Jinniu Heavy Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jining Jinniu Heavy Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jining Rely Heavy Industry Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jining Rely Heavy Industry Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Dongcheng Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Dongcheng Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Dongcheng Digital Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Dongcheng Digital Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yangjiang Hehui Industry & Trade Co. Supplier Evaluation
Yangjiang Hehui Industry & Trade Co. Supplier Evaluation
Wuyi Jucheng Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuyi Jucheng Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Ganjiang Industry& Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Ganjiang Industry& Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Aibokaier Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Aibokaier Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Eego Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Eego Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yongkang Kesidi Industry&Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yongkang Kesidi Industry&Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Hangjia Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Hangjia Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Oulang Industry & Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Oulang Industry & Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Tongchengjianhui Industry & Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Tongchengjianhui Industry & Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Seanoel Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Seanoel Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lanxi Wanlin Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lanxi Wanlin Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fuzhou Luqi Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fuzhou Luqi Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Kedi Communication Equipment Sales Department (General Partnership) Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Kedi Communication Equipment Sales Department (General Partnership) Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Henan Yuantong Heavy Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Yuantong Heavy Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Abm Magnetics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Abm Magnetics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Hongyi Lighting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Hongyi Lighting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongyang Yihe Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongyang Yihe Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Lvhang Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Lvhang Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shengzhou Cuyino Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shengzhou Cuyino Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuzhou Xirui Glass Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuzhou Xirui Glass Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Youhao Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Youhao Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yangzhou Dongtai Solar Energy Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yangzhou Dongtai Solar Energy Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Sinocoroplast Packing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Sinocoroplast Packing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Engineering Plastics Industries (Group) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Engineering Plastics Industries (Group) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Xinguangzheng Xinyuan Construction Engineering Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Xinguangzheng Xinyuan Construction Engineering Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qeepei Auto (Ningbo) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qeepei Auto (Ningbo) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Yijue Tengda Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Yijue Tengda Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhu Fuchun Dye And Weave Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhu Fuchun Dye And Weave Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Mingyang Ages Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Mingyang Ages Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangxi Jingbo International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangxi Jingbo International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foyo (Changting) Marine Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foyo (Changting) Marine Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Arctic Point Cold Chain Technology (Hangzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Arctic Point Cold Chain Technology (Hangzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Wincoda Coatings Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Wincoda Coatings Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026