Qeepei Auto (Ningbo) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Qeepei Auto (Ningbo) Co., Ltd. is a China-based automotive fastener and retainer clip supplier located in Zhejiang, with a reported factory area of 2,900+ m² and 50+ staff. The supplier appears positioned as a small-to-medium production-oriented factory serving buyers of automotive plastic clips, fastener kits, rivets, and related universal auto accessories. Its platform credibility is strong, supported by 13 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, verified supplier status, and listed operational indicators such as response time within 2 hours and 95.8% on-time delivery. Business performance is also solid, with 100+ orders and CN¥5.7M+ transaction value over the past six months. However, the available data does not confirm Full Customization capability or Finished Product Inspection, and the review count is moderate at 20+. Overall, this supplier is suitable for buyers seeking stable, mid-scale sourcing of automotive fastener products with platform-backed transaction security.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
The supplier reports a factory area of 2,900+ m², 50+ staff, and verified supplier status. The factory is located in Zhejiang, China.

Elaboration:
The available factory size and staffing indicate a production base with basic operational scale rather than a large industrial manufacturing facility. A 2,900+ m² factory and 50+ employees suggest the supplier has internal production or handling capacity suitable for standardized automotive fastener and clip products. The verified supplier status adds a degree of factory credibility, but the provided data does not include detailed production lines, annual capacity, machinery count, or audit reports.

Scoring Rationale:
This supplier fits the profile of a small-to-medium stable factory. It has more than minimal production resources and a verified supplier indicator, but the scale does not support classification as a large-scale supply chain operation. The absence of detailed capacity data limits the ability to assign a higher score.

Final Score: 15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
The supplier is listed as an Gold Supplier for 13 years, supports Trade Assurance, and has verified supplier status. Platform tags include “Response time ≤2h” and “On-time delivery 95.8%.”

Elaboration:
A 13-year Gold Supplier history is a strong platform credibility signal, particularly when combined with Trade Assurance. Trade Assurance provides buyers with a transaction protection mechanism, while verified supplier status indicates that some level of platform verification has been completed. The listed operational tags further support platform transparency, although no additional compliance certifications or industry-specific certifications are provided in the data.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier demonstrates strong platform-backed credibility due to long Gold Supplier tenure, Trade Assurance support, and supplier verification. The score is not the absolute maximum because the data does not provide a complete certification profile beyond platform indicators.

Final Score: 19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
The supplier recorded 100+ orders in the past six months, CN¥5.7M+ transaction value, a store rating of 4.7, and 20+ reviews.

Elaboration:
The six-month order volume and transaction amount indicate active commercial performance and meaningful buyer demand. CN¥5.7M+ in recent transaction value suggests the supplier is not merely listed on the platform but has demonstrated actual sales conversion. The 4.7 store rating is positive, while the 20+ review count provides some customer feedback base, though it is not a large volume of reviews.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier shows strong business validation through both order count and transaction value. The rating is favorable, supporting buyer satisfaction. However, the review count remains moderate, which prevents the score from reaching the highest range reserved for suppliers with both high transaction scale and extensive review history.

Final Score: 18 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
The supplier’s communication response time is listed as ≤2h. No data is provided regarding Full Customization capability.

Elaboration:
A response time within two hours indicates relatively efficient communication and acceptable service responsiveness for international sourcing. This is important for inquiry handling, quotation clarification, and order coordination. However, the available information does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization, private labeling, packaging customization, or product development services.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier demonstrates good communication efficiency, but the lack of confirmed Full Customization data limits the service capability score. Based on the provided data, it can be considered responsive but not fully validated as a strong customization partner.

Final Score: 7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is 95.8%.

Elaboration:
A 95.8% on-time delivery rate is a strong operational indicator. For procurement buyers, this suggests the supplier has relatively reliable order fulfillment performance and can support routine replenishment or scheduled shipment requirements. The data does not include average lead time or logistics arrangements, but the on-time delivery percentage itself is above the 90% benchmark.

Scoring Rationale:
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 point range. At 95.8%, the supplier demonstrates strong delivery reliability based on the available platform data.

Final Score: 10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
The supplier has a store rating of 4.7, 20+ reviews, and verified supplier status. No data is provided confirming Finished Product Inspection.

Elaboration:
The 4.7 rating indicates generally positive customer feedback, and the 20+ reviews provide a basic but not extensive evidence base. Verified supplier status contributes to confidence in supplier legitimacy. However, there is no provided confirmation of Finished Product Inspection, product quality certifications, defect rate, return rate, or third-party inspection procedures.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has a positive customer rating and some review history, supported by supplier verification. However, the quality assurance system is not fully evidenced in the provided data. The missing Finished Product Inspection information creates a limitation for buyers with strict quality control requirements.

Final Score: 15 / 20

Total Score

Company Strength: 15 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility: 19 / 20
Business Performance: 18 / 20
Service Capability: 7 / 10
Delivery Performance: 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback: 15 / 20

Total Score: 84 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended, especially for buyers sourcing automotive retainer clips, fastener kits, rivets, and universal plastic auto accessory components at small-to-medium or repeat-order scale. The supplier is particularly suitable for buyers who value platform credibility, Trade Assurance protection, proven recent transaction activity, and strong delivery reliability.

Main risk points include insufficient data on Full Customization capability, Finished Product Inspection, detailed production capacity, and formal product or quality certifications. Buyers with strict OEM development, private-label packaging, or advanced compliance requirements should verify these points before placing larger orders.

Growth potential appears positive based on the supplier’s 13-year Gold Supplier history, CN¥5.7M+ recent transaction value, 100+ recent orders, and 95.8% on-time delivery rate. A reasonable procurement approach would be to begin with sample orders or controlled batch orders, then scale purchasing after confirming product consistency, inspection process, packaging requirements, and after-sales handling.