zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Qufu Lekang Medical Technology Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Qufu Lekang Medical Technology Group Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Shandong, with a reported factory area of 28,000+ m² and 190+ staff. The company appears to have a medium-to-large production foundation and is marked as a verified supplier, supporting products such as electric beauty tables, hospital equipment, operating tables, and gynecological delivery tables with low MOQ of 1 unit. On , the supplier holds Gold Supplier status for 1 year, supports Trade Assurance, and lists Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, 98.4% on-time delivery, and response time within 2 hours. Business performance is moderate, with 90+ orders and CN¥1M+ transaction value in the past six months, a 4.6 store rating, and 10+ reviews. This supplier is suitable for buyers seeking flexible MOQ, customization, and mid-scale procurement, but further verification is recommended due to short platform history and limited review volume.

Qufu Lekang Medical Technology Group Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Factory location: Shandong, China
  • Factory area: 28,000+ m²
  • Employees: 190+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Product scope includes medical/hospital-related tables and equipment listed in the provided data

Elaboration

The supplier reports a sizeable factory footprint of over 28,000 m², which indicates a meaningful physical production base. The employee count of 190+ suggests that the company is beyond a small workshop level and has the manpower to support regular production, assembly, inspection, and order handling. The verified supplier status provides an additional credibility signal regarding the company’s operational existence and basic supplier profile.

However, the provided data does not include detailed production lines, annual production capacity, equipment lists, export volume, or factory audit reports. Therefore, while the factory size and staffing level support a solid manufacturing capability assessment, there is insufficient data to classify the supplier as a fully large-scale or highly integrated supply chain operator.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates characteristics of a stable medium-sized manufacturer: a 28,000+ m² facility, 190+ employees, and verified supplier status. These are positive indicators for production stability. However, the absence of detailed production capacity, machinery, and formal factory audit documentation limits the ability to assign a top-tier score.

Final Score

17 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 1 year
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Certification/industry tags:
  • Finished product inspection
  • Full customization
  • On-time delivery 98.4%
  • Response time ≤2h

Elaboration

The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. These elements provide a basic level of transactional and platform-backed trust. Trade Assurance is particularly relevant for buyers who require payment protection and order-performance safeguards.

The main limitation is the short Gold Supplier history of only 1 year. A longer platform track record would provide stronger evidence of consistency, buyer trust, and operational continuity on the marketplace. The listed platform tags are useful, especially Finished Product Inspection and Full Customization, but no external certifications such as ISO, CE, FDA, or other medical equipment compliance documents are provided in the dataset. Therefore, those certifications must be treated as Insufficient Data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has core platform credibility features, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verification. However, the 1-year Gold Supplier duration is relatively short, and external compliance certification information is not provided. This supports a good but not high-end score.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in past 6 months: 90+
  • Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥1M+
  • Store rating: 4.6
  • Reviews: 10+

Elaboration

The supplier has achieved 90+ orders and CN¥1M+ in transaction value over the past six months, indicating active commercial traction on the platform. This level of order activity suggests that the supplier is receiving regular buyer demand and has demonstrated some capability to convert inquiries into transactions.

The store rating of 4.6 is generally positive, though not at the highest level. The review count of 10+ is relatively limited, meaning that customer feedback is not yet broad enough to strongly validate long-term consistency across a large buyer base. The data supports a conclusion of moderate and active business performance rather than mature, high-volume market validation.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows stable commercial activity with 90+ recent orders and CN¥1M+ transaction value, which is a positive business signal. However, the limited number of reviews reduces confidence in broader customer validation. The 4.6 rating is acceptable but not exceptional.

Final Score

15 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Response time: ≤2h
  • Full customization: Listed as supported

Elaboration

The supplier provides a response time within 2 hours, which indicates reasonably efficient communication. This is suitable for buyers requiring timely quotation, specification discussion, and order coordination. The presence of the Full Customization tag is also valuable, especially for buyers seeking product adjustments based on size, function, configuration, or branding needs, although the exact customization scope is not detailed in the provided data.

The response time does not meet the strongest benchmark of ≤1 hour, so the supplier cannot be rated at the highest service level. Additionally, no data is provided regarding multilingual support, engineering support, sample handling speed, after-sales service structure, or dedicated account management. These areas are therefore marked as Insufficient Data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates good service capability through ≤2h response time and Full Customization support. However, because response is not within 1 hour and detailed service-process information is missing, a strong but not top-level score is appropriate.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 98.4%

Elaboration

The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate of 98.4% is a strong indicator of delivery reliability. This performance exceeds the 90% benchmark for the highest scoring range and suggests that the supplier has effective order scheduling and shipment execution on the platform.

However, the data does not provide shipment volume breakdown, average lead time, delay reasons, logistics partners, or performance by destination market. Therefore, while the available on-time delivery metric is excellent, broader delivery-risk evaluation remains partially limited.

Scoring Rationale

Based strictly on the provided on-time delivery rate of 98.4%, the supplier qualifies for the highest delivery-performance range. The score reflects strong platform-recorded delivery reliability.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.6
  • Reviews: 10+
  • Finished Product Inspection: Listed
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Factory Verification: not separately specified; supplier verification is provided
  • External product certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a 4.6 store rating, which indicates generally positive buyer feedback. The Finished Product Inspection tag is a useful quality-control indicator, suggesting that products are inspected before shipment. Verified supplier status also contributes to basic quality and credibility assurance.

However, the number of reviews is only 10+, which limits the depth of customer feedback available for analysis. A larger review base would provide stronger evidence of consistency across multiple buyers and order types. In addition, the provided data does not include specific medical product certifications, quality management system certificates, inspection reports, warranty terms, or defect-rate data. These areas remain Insufficient Data and should be verified before regulated or large-volume procurement.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has positive quality indicators, including a 4.6 rating, Finished Product Inspection, and verified supplier status. Nevertheless, the relatively low review count and lack of detailed certification or inspection documentation prevent a higher score.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 17 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 16 / 20
Business Performance 15 / 20
Service Capability 8 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 16 / 20
Total Score 82 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

Qufu Lekang Medical Technology Group Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ sourcing, customized products, and medium-scale procurement of the listed medical/hospital-related tables and equipment. The supplier shows solid factory scale, active recent transaction performance, Trade Assurance support, Finished Product Inspection, and excellent reported on-time delivery performance.

Suitable customer types:
- Small to medium importers requiring MOQ flexibility
- Distributors testing new product categories
- Buyers needing customization support
- Procurement teams seeking suppliers with verified platform credentials and Trade Assurance protection

Main risks:
- Gold Supplier history is only 1 year
- Review volume is limited at 10+
- External certifications such as ISO, CE, FDA, or medical device compliance documents are Insufficient Data
- Detailed production capacity, warranty terms, and after-sales process are Insufficient Data

Growth potential:
The supplier has strong operational indicators, especially factory size, customization support, and 98.4% on-time delivery. If it expands review volume, strengthens certification transparency, and builds a longer platform track record, it could develop into a stronger sourcing candidate for larger and more compliance-sensitive procurement programs.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Fushikang Medical Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fushikang Medical Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Houde Hanfang Medical Devices Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Houde Hanfang Medical Devices Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Qufu Taifeng Mechanical Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Qufu Taifeng Mechanical Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fortune Technology Group Supplier Evaluation
Fortune Technology Group Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Chinaherbs Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Chinaherbs Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Jinguang Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Jinguang Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Pinheng Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Pinheng Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Voten Medical Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Voten Medical Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Caremed Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Caremed Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Aide Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Aide Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Aupcon Medical Technology (Wuxi) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Aupcon Medical Technology (Wuxi) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Kangquan Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Kangquan Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Meiji Medical Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Meiji Medical Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Fomos Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Fomos Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Aicor Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Aicor Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Daxia Medical Technology (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Daxia Medical Technology (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Kangningda Medical Science&Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Kangningda Medical Science&Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Ansen Medical Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Ansen Medical Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kang Rui Ling Shu (Suzhou) Intelligent Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kang Rui Ling Shu (Suzhou) Intelligent Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Ledio Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Ledio Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Yiwu Sendpinzhong Import & Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Sendpinzhong Import & Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Honghao Electron Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Honghao Electron Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Returnstar Interactive Technology Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Returnstar Interactive Technology Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Ruiboxin Construction Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Ruiboxin Construction Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Yuheng Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Yuheng Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuxi Sanyou Steel Supply Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuxi Sanyou Steel Supply Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Jinwei Kangda Medical Instrument Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Jinwei Kangda Medical Instrument Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Yuxing Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Yuxing Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anyang Yingpai Dental Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anyang Yingpai Dental Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shengzhou Xiuhe Necktie & Weaving Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shengzhou Xiuhe Necktie & Weaving Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Hongya Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Hongya Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Watercoolers Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Watercoolers Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Finelink Photoelectric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Finelink Photoelectric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangmen Xinshichuang New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangmen Xinshichuang New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Biobase Meihua Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Biobase Meihua Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanjing Shangchao Shidai Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanjing Shangchao Shidai Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xingtai Qiwo Rubber & Plastic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xingtai Qiwo Rubber & Plastic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Huanfu Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Huanfu Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Xiaotianhang Bicycle Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Xiaotianhang Bicycle Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cangzhou Feiyu Construction Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cangzhou Feiyu Construction Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026