zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Hebei Houde Hanfang Medical Devices Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Supplier Evaluation Report

Supplier: Hebei Houde Hanfang Medical Devices Group Co., Ltd.
Country/Region: China, Hebei

Hebei Houde Hanfang Medical Devices Group Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Hebei Houde Hanfang Medical Devices Group Co., Ltd. appears to be a verified medical-device-related patch supplier with a sizeable operating base, including a reported factory area of 37,000+㎡ and 260+ staff. The company offers heat patches, cooling gel patches, hydrogel cooling patches, and baby cooling gel pads, with relatively low listed MOQs across several products. On , the supplier has 6 years as a Gold Supplier, supports Trade Assurance, and carries platform labels including warranty availability, on-time delivery of 91.6%, response time within 1 hour, and full customization. Its recent business performance shows 100+ orders and CN¥2.1M+ transaction value over the past six months, with a 4.6 store rating and 40+ reviews. Overall, this supplier is suitable for buyers seeking stable mid-to-large-scale sourcing of patch products with customization needs. Key limitations include limited disclosed quality-system details and no provided data on Finished Product Inspection.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 pts

Basis

  • Factory location: Hebei, China
  • Factory area: 37,000+㎡
  • Employee count: 260+ staff
  • Verified/audited supplier: True
  • Product scope provided: menstrual pain heat patches, cooling gel patches, hydrogel cooling patches, baby cooling gel pads

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates a relatively strong physical operating base, with a factory area exceeding 37,000㎡ and more than 260 employees. This indicates a manufacturing organization beyond a small workshop level and suggests the ability to support repeat orders and multiple product lines within the patch category. The presence of supplier verification also strengthens confidence in the company’s disclosed basic profile.

However, the provided data does not include production line quantity, annual output, equipment details, cleanroom information, medical-device manufacturing certifications, or specific factory audit reports. Therefore, while the supplier shows meaningful scale, the evaluation cannot confirm whether it reaches the level of a fully large-scale, highly certified medical-device manufacturing operation.

Scoring Rationale

The company has a substantial factory footprint and a moderate-to-large employee base, which supports a strong manufacturing profile. Supplier verification further improves credibility. Nevertheless, the absence of detailed production capacity and formal factory certification data prevents assigning a near-perfect score. The company fits between a stable medium-to-large manufacturer and a fully documented large-scale supply chain.

Final Score

18 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 pts

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 6 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier status: True
  • Platform/industry labels:
  • Warranty available
  • On-time delivery 91.6%
  • Response time ≤1h
  • Full customization

Elaboration

The supplier has maintained Gold Supplier status for 6 years, which provides a relatively mature platform operating history. Trade Assurance support adds transactional protection for buyers, while verified supplier status strengthens platform-level credibility. The available platform labels also indicate service and delivery-related transparency, including warranty availability and customization support.

The supplier’s platform credibility is strong based on the provided data. However, no additional third-party compliance certificates, product certifications, regulatory approvals, or detailed medical-device compliance documents are provided. As a result, the score should recognize strong platform credibility while avoiding assumptions about broader regulatory compliance.

Scoring Rationale

A 6-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, and supplier verification form a solid credibility foundation. The supplier has more than basic platform backing and appears relatively established on . The lack of disclosed product certifications or detailed compliance documentation slightly limits the score from reaching the absolute top range.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 pts

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 100+
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥2.1M+
  • Store rating: 4.6
  • Number of reviews: 40+

Elaboration

The supplier has achieved more than 100 orders and over CN¥2.1M in transaction value within the past six months. This indicates active commercial performance and a level of market validation from real transactions. The 4.6 store rating is generally positive, suggesting that buyers have had acceptable purchasing experiences.

At the same time, the review count of 40+ is not extremely high relative to larger, highly mature platform sellers. The order and transaction figures indicate stable activity, but not necessarily very high-volume global trading performance. The data supports confidence in the supplier’s commercial viability, but the scale appears moderate rather than top-tier.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates real transaction volume and recent buyer activity. CN¥2.1M+ over six months and 100+ orders are meaningful indicators of market acceptance. However, the number of reviews is still limited, and the 4.6 rating, while good, is not at the highest performance level. Therefore, the supplier is best assessed as having stable mid-level business performance.

Final Score

16 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 pts

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤1h
  • Platform label: Full customization

Elaboration

The supplier shows strong service responsiveness, with a stated response time of within one hour. This is important for procurement communication, quotation clarification, sampling, packaging customization, and order follow-up. The platform label also confirms full customization capability, which is relevant for buyers requiring customized patch specifications, branding, packaging, or order configurations.

The provided data does not include sample lead time, account manager availability, multilingual support, after-sales process details, or design support capability. However, based strictly on available indicators, the supplier’s service capability is strong.

Scoring Rationale

A response time of ≤1 hour meets the highest service benchmark in the scoring framework. The full customization label further supports strong service flexibility. Since several deeper service details are not provided, a full perfect score is slightly moderated, but the supplier remains in the top range.

Final Score

9 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 pts

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 91.6%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is 91.6%, which exceeds the 90% benchmark for strong delivery performance. This suggests the company is generally reliable in meeting scheduled shipment timelines. For procurement teams, this level of delivery performance is favorable, particularly for repeat orders and products with seasonal or promotional demand.

However, the provided data does not include average lead time, peak-season delivery stability, logistics options, historical delay reasons, or shipment destinations. Therefore, the analysis can confirm good on-time performance but cannot fully assess end-to-end logistics robustness.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% falls within the 9–10 point range. The supplier qualifies for a strong delivery score. Since the rate is 91.6%, which is above threshold but not exceptionally high, a score of 9 is appropriate.

Final Score

9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 pts

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.6
  • Review count: 40+
  • Verified/audited supplier: True
  • Warranty available: Yes, based on platform label
  • Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
  • Specific product certifications or quality system certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a 4.6 store rating and more than 40 reviews, indicating generally positive customer feedback. Verified supplier status and the availability of warranty support provide additional quality-related reassurance. These factors suggest that the supplier has some level of operational and after-sales credibility.

However, quality assurance data is incomplete. The provided information does not confirm Finished Product Inspection, specific medical-device quality certifications, laboratory testing standards, regulatory approvals, or detailed QC procedures. Since the products are medical-device-related patches or skin-contact patch products, the absence of disclosed quality-system data is a meaningful limitation from a procurement risk perspective.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier receives credit for a good store rating, customer review base, verified status, and warranty availability. However, the review count is moderate rather than large, and there is insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection or formal product/quality certifications. Therefore, the supplier fits the “good feedback with basic quality assurance indicators” range, but not the top quality tier.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 18 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 19 / 20
Business Performance 16 / 20
Service Capability 9 / 10
Delivery Performance 9 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 15 / 20
Total 86 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

Hebei Houde Hanfang Medical Devices Group Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking a verified China-based supplier for heat patches, cooling gel patches, hydrogel cooling patches, and baby cooling gel pads. The supplier is especially suitable for customers requiring responsive communication, customization support, Trade Assurance protection, and moderate-to-large repeat purchasing.

Best-fit customer types:
- Importers and distributors sourcing patch products
- Private-label buyers requiring customization
- E-commerce sellers seeking low-to-medium MOQ patch products
- Buyers prioritizing Trade Assurance and verified supplier status

Main risk points:
- Finished Product Inspection status: Insufficient Data
- Product certifications and regulatory compliance documents: Insufficient Data
- Detailed production capacity, lead time, and QC process data are not provided
- Review count is moderate, not extensive

Growth potential:
The supplier shows strong platform credibility, fast response capability, stable recent transactions, and a sizeable factory base. If it can provide more complete quality documentation, inspection reports, and product compliance evidence, it could become a stronger candidate for higher-value or more regulated procurement programs.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Jiangsu Meilan Medical Devices Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Meilan Medical Devices Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chengdu Xinyida Medical Devices Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chengdu Xinyida Medical Devices Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shuge Medical Beauty Devices Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shuge Medical Beauty Devices Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fushikang Medical Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fushikang Medical Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qufu Lekang Medical Technology Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qufu Lekang Medical Technology Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Tomato Group Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Tomato Group Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Kangji Medical Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Kangji Medical Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Pioneer Medical Instrument Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Pioneer Medical Instrument Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Longheng Medical Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Longheng Medical Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Hanfang Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Hanfang Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Imachine (Xiamen) Intelligent Devices Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Imachine (Xiamen) Intelligent Devices Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei New Speed Technology Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei New Speed Technology Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Xingyuan Sealing Parts  Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Xingyuan Sealing Parts Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Zhongtian Composite Materials Group Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Zhongtian Composite Materials Group Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Tianck Medical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianck Medical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hochey Medical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hochey Medical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Mecan Medical Limited Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Mecan Medical Limited Supplier Evaluation
Icen Medical Equipment Limited Supplier Evaluation
Icen Medical Equipment Limited Supplier Evaluation
Kangfu Medical Equipment Factory Supplier Evaluation
Kangfu Medical Equipment Factory Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Lantu Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Lantu Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Ningbo Ryaca Electrical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Ryaca Electrical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Tongzhu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Tongzhu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Suihua Fiberglass Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Suihua Fiberglass Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan City Xinhui Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan City Xinhui Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Taiji Lifting Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Taiji Lifting Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Zhenda Brush Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Zhenda Brush Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Maoyuan Parking Equipment Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Maoyuan Parking Equipment Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Winture New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Winture New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Gracer Renewable Resources Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Gracer Renewable Resources Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Manorshi Electronics Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Manorshi Electronics Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Ronghan Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Ronghan Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Vis Film Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Vis Film Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Linyi Junteng Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Linyi Junteng Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yujiang (Cangzhou) Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yujiang (Cangzhou) Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chiping New Decor Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chiping New Decor Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen  Maono Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Maono Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Jistar Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Jistar Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongyang Haiqiang Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongyang Haiqiang Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Liancheng Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Liancheng Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Xuxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Xuxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026