Zhejiang Aicor Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Zhejiang Aicor Medical Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based medical-related consumables supplier located in Zhejiang, with reported facilities of 22,000+ m² and 300+ staff. The company offers products including cuvettes, plastic urine sample collection items, urine collection cups, and reaction cuvettes, with relatively low MOQs ranging from 500 to 13,000 pieces depending on product type. Its platform credibility is strong, supported by 16 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, supplier verification, Finished Product Inspection, warranty availability, minor customization, and ODM service availability. Commercial performance appears moderate: 20+ orders and CN¥67.6K+ transaction value in the past six months, with a 5.0 store rating but only 8 reviews. Delivery performance is a major strength, with a 100.0% on-time shipment rate. This supplier is most suitable for buyers seeking verified medical plastic consumables with reliable delivery and moderate transaction validation, while large-scale buyers should further verify production capacity, quality systems, and customization depth before committing to high-volume procurement.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
- Factory area: 22,000+ m²
- Employees: 300+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Country/Province: China, Zhejiang

Elaboration:
The supplier shows a relatively strong physical operating base, with a factory area above 22,000 m² and more than 300 staff. These figures indicate a medium-to-large production organization rather than a small trading entity. The verified supplier status also provides additional confidence that the company’s operational presence has been reviewed on the platform.

Scoring Rationale:
The combination of factory scale, employee count, and verified supplier status supports a strong assessment of company strength. While the data indicates a sizable and stable production base, there is no additional detail on production lines, annual output, machinery, or internationally recognized factory certifications, so the score should not reach the maximum.

Final Score: 18/20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 16 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification/industry labels: Warranty available, Finished Product Inspection, Minor customization, ODM service available
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has a long-standing presence, with 16 years as a Gold Supplier. Trade Assurance availability strengthens transaction protection, while supplier verification and listed service/quality labels provide further platform-level credibility. Finished Product Inspection and warranty availability are particularly relevant for procurement risk control.

Scoring Rationale:
A 16-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status represent a strong platform credibility profile. The certification label set is useful, though the data does not show detailed third-party medical certifications or named compliance certificates. Therefore, the supplier is highly credible on the platform, but not fully score-maximized due to limited formal certification detail.

Final Score: 19/20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
- Past 6-month orders: 20+
- Past 6-month transaction value: CN¥67.6K+
- Store rating: 5.0
- Review count: 8

Elaboration:
The supplier has recorded active transactions in the past six months, showing more than 20 orders and transaction value above CN¥67.6K. The 5.0 store rating is positive, but the review base is limited at only 8 reviews, which reduces the statistical strength of the customer feedback.

Scoring Rationale:
The business record demonstrates real recent activity, but the order volume and transaction value are not high enough to indicate strong market validation at scale. The perfect store rating is favorable, yet the small number of reviews limits confidence in broad buyer satisfaction. This supports a moderate-to-good business performance score rather than a top-tier score.

Final Score: 14/20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
- Response time: ≤4h
- Customization labels: Minor customization, ODM service available
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration:
The supplier’s response time of within 4 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency. The availability of minor customization and ODM service suggests some ability to adapt products or support buyer-specific requirements, but the provided data does not confirm Full Customization capability.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier meets a reasonable service standard through timely response and some customization-related services. However, because response time is not within the strongest ≤1h range and Full Customization is not confirmed, the service capability should be rated as solid but not premium.

Final Score: 7/10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
- On-time shipment rate: 100.0%

Elaboration:
The supplier reports a perfect on-time shipment rate, which is a strong indicator of delivery reliability based on the available platform data. For buyers managing replenishment schedules or time-sensitive procurement, this is a clear operational advantage.

Scoring Rationale:
According to the scoring standard, an on-time shipment rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the reported rate is 100.0%, the supplier receives the maximum score in this category.

Final Score: 10/10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
- Store rating: 5.0
- Review count: 8
- Finished Product Inspection: Available
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration:
The supplier’s 5.0 rating is a positive quality signal, and Finished Product Inspection indicates a basic quality assurance mechanism before shipment. Supplier verification further improves confidence in the company’s operating legitimacy. However, only 8 reviews are available, so customer feedback depth remains limited.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier shows good quality indicators through a perfect rating, finished product inspection, and verification status. The main limitation is the small review count, which means customer feedback is not yet broad enough to support a top-tier quality score. The quality profile is good, but further buyer-side sampling or inspection is advisable for larger orders.

Final Score: 16/20

Total Score

84/100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with controlled initial procurement. Zhejiang Aicor Medical Technology Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers sourcing medical plastic consumables such as cuvettes and urine sample collection products, especially those requiring verified platform credibility, reliable delivery, and moderate MOQ flexibility. Key risks include limited review volume, moderate recent transaction scale, and insufficient data on Full Customization and detailed third-party medical certifications. Growth potential is positive due to its factory scale, 16-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, ODM availability, and 100.0% on-time shipment performance.