Btongint (Shenzhen) Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Supplier Evaluation Report: Btongint (Shenzhen) Auto Parts Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Btongint (Shenzhen) Auto Parts Co., Ltd. is a China-based auto parts supplier located in Guangdong, with a reported factory area of over 2,600㎡ and more than 30 staff. The company appears to operate as a small-scale but established supplier with verified supplier status, Gold Supplier membership for 2 years, and Trade Assurance support. Its product listings focus on automotive accessories and replacement parts suitable for vehicle models including Volkswagen, Audi, Benz, and related applications, with low MOQ levels of 1–2 pieces, making it potentially suitable for small-batch buyers, repair-parts distributors, and trial-order procurement.

The supplier shows moderate commercial activity, with 100+ orders and CN¥338K+ transaction value over the past six months. Store rating is 4.6 with 20+ reviews, indicating acceptable but not yet extensive market validation. Delivery performance is strong, with a 100.0% on-time delivery rate. Key limitations include limited workforce scale, short Gold Supplier tenure, and insufficient data on customization capability and finished product inspection systems.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Final Score: 13 / 20

Basis

• Factory location: Guangdong, China
• Factory area: 2,600+㎡
• Employees: 30+ staff
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a documented physical factory footprint of over 2,600㎡ and a workforce of more than 30 employees. This indicates the company has a real operating base and basic production or supply-handling capacity. The verified supplier status provides additional confidence that some level of supplier verification has been completed.

However, the reported factory size and employee count suggest a relatively small-scale operation rather than a large industrial manufacturing base. There is no additional data on production lines, monthly output, equipment, warehouse capacity, R&D team, or advanced factory certifications.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates basic operational stability through its factory area, staff count, and verified supplier status. Nevertheless, its scale remains limited compared with medium or large factories. The available data supports classification as a small supplier with basic production or supply capability, rather than a large-scale stable supply chain partner.

Final Score

13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Final Score: 15 / 20

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier tenure: 2 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Certification / platform labels: “Response time ≤2h”, “On-time delivery 100.0%”
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. These elements improve transactional security and provide buyers with a basic level of platform-backed trust.

The Gold Supplier tenure is 2 years, which is positive but still relatively short. The available certification or industry label data mainly reflects service and delivery performance rather than technical, product-quality, or industry-specific certifications. No information is provided on ISO certification, automotive quality management certification, product compliance certification, or third-party audit reports.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has the core platform credibility elements required for safer online sourcing: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verification. However, the credibility profile is not yet mature due to the short 2-year Gold Supplier history and lack of detailed compliance or product certification data. This places the supplier in the category of having core platform certification but not a long-established compliance record.

Final Score

15 / 20

3. Business Performance

Final Score: 15 / 20

Basis

• Orders in past 6 months: 100+
• Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥338K+
• Store rating: 4.6
• Reviews: 20+

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded more than 100 orders over the past six months, which indicates active commercial engagement and repeatable online transaction capability. The transaction value of CN¥338K+ shows that buyers have placed meaningful orders, though the value does not indicate a high-volume industrial procurement profile.

The store rating of 4.6 is generally acceptable, but the review base of 20+ is still limited. This means the commercial track record is visible but not yet deeply validated by a large number of customer reviews.

Scoring Rationale

The order count and transaction value show stable moderate activity rather than weak or inactive performance. However, the relatively small number of reviews limits confidence in long-term consistency. The rating is good but not exceptional. Overall, the supplier fits the profile of a moderately active supplier with acceptable but not high-level commercial validation.

Final Score

15 / 20

4. Service Capability

Final Score: 6 / 10

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤2h
• Full Customization capability: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier shows a response time of within 2 hours, which is positive and indicates reasonable communication efficiency. This is suitable for buyers requiring timely quotation follow-up, order confirmation, and general inquiry handling.

However, there is no provided data confirming Full Customization capability, engineering support, design modification service, private labeling, packaging customization, or OEM/ODM service structure. Because customization capability is a key scoring factor, the lack of data limits the service capability score.

Scoring Rationale

The response speed is good but does not meet the strongest service level of ≤1 hour. More importantly, customization capability cannot be confirmed from the provided data. Therefore, the supplier can be considered responsive for standard procurement inquiries, but its capability for complex customization or project-based sourcing remains unverified.

Final Score

6 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Final Score: 10 / 10

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is the strongest delivery indicator available in the dataset. This suggests that, based on available platform data, the supplier has performed reliably in dispatching orders on schedule.

No additional information is provided on average lead time, logistics options, export shipping experience, urgent order handling, or delivery performance by product category. However, the on-time delivery rate itself is clear and directly supports a strong delivery score.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. With a reported rate of 100.0%, the supplier reaches the highest performance tier for this dimension.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Final Score: 14 / 20

Basis

• Store rating: 4.6
• Reviews: 20+
• Verified supplier: True
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
• Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided as True

Elaboration

The supplier has a store rating of 4.6, which indicates generally positive customer feedback. The presence of 20+ reviews provides some customer validation, though the review base is still relatively limited. Verified supplier status adds a basic level of confidence regarding supplier legitimacy.

However, no data is provided regarding Finished Product Inspection, formal quality control process, inspection reports, defect rate, warranty policy, automotive quality certifications, or third-party product testing. For auto parts procurement, quality consistency is highly important, and the absence of detailed inspection data creates a clear limitation.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has acceptable rating performance and some customer feedback, supported by verified supplier status. However, the review volume is not large, and the lack of confirmed finished product inspection prevents classification as a supplier with a complete quality assurance system. The supplier therefore falls into the category of good basic feedback but incomplete quality assurance visibility.

Final Score

14 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation

Conditionally recommended for trial cooperation.

Btongint (Shenzhen) Auto Parts Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking small-batch procurement, sample orders, repair-parts sourcing, or low-MOQ automotive accessory purchases. Its low MOQ levels, active order record, Trade Assurance support, and 100.0% on-time delivery rate make it a practical option for initial sourcing and controlled-volume purchasing.

Suitable Customer Types

• Small and medium auto parts distributors
• Repair-parts buyers requiring low MOQ
• Buyers testing product-market fit with trial orders
• E-commerce sellers handling selected automotive accessories
• Procurement teams seeking suppliers with Trade Assurance protection

Main Risk Points

• Factory scale is limited, with 2,600+㎡ and 30+ staff
• Gold Supplier history is only 2 years
• Review volume is relatively low at 20+ reviews
• Full Customization capability: Insufficient Data
• Finished Product Inspection system: Insufficient Data
• No provided data on formal automotive quality certifications or product testing

Growth Potential

The supplier shows moderate business activity, strong delivery performance, and basic platform credibility. If it can provide clearer quality inspection documentation, customization capability details, and more evidence of stable customer feedback, its procurement attractiveness could improve. For now, buyers should begin with sample orders or small trial orders before moving to larger procurement volumes.