zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Guangzhou Shijingcheng Nonwoven Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Supplier Evaluation Report

Supplier: Guangzhou Shijingcheng Nonwoven Products Co., Ltd.
Country/Region: Guangdong, China
Main Listed Products: Disposable slippers for hotel, spa, Airbnb, home guest, and portable guest use

Guangzhou Shijingcheng Nonwoven Products Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Guangzhou Shijingcheng Nonwoven Products Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier focused on disposable slipper products, including hotel, spa, Airbnb, home guest, and portable guest-use slippers. Based on the available data, the company operates from a factory area of over 2,000 m² with more than 10 staff and is marked as a verified supplier, indicating a basic but credible production foundation. Its platform profile is relatively strong, supported by 9 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, and a 100% on-time delivery label. Commercial performance is moderate, with 100+ orders and CN¥270.4K+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.7 store rating and 40+ reviews. The supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking small to medium-volume disposable slipper sourcing with low MOQ requirements. However, limited data on customization capability, finished product inspection, and detailed factory certification creates some quality and scalability uncertainty.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Final Score: 12 / 20

Basis

  • Factory location: Guangdong, China
  • Factory area: 2,000+ m²
  • Employee count: 10+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Product focus: Disposable slippers for spa, hotel, Airbnb, guest, and home use

Elaboration

The supplier has a physical factory footprint of over 2,000 m² and a reported workforce of more than 10 staff. This indicates that the company has an operational manufacturing base, but the scale is relatively limited compared with larger industrial suppliers. The product range shown is concentrated around disposable slippers, suggesting a focused product category rather than a broad multi-industry operation. The presence of a verified supplier status strengthens its basic credibility, but no additional factory audit details, production line count, monthly capacity, machinery information, or international factory certifications are provided.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates basic manufacturing capability through its factory area, staff count, and verified supplier status. However, the relatively small employee base and absence of detailed production capacity data limit confidence in large-volume or highly complex procurement programs. It fits the category of a small supplier with foundational production capability rather than a large-scale stable supply chain.

Final Score

12 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Final Score: 18 / 20

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier tenure: 9 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Platform/industry labels: “Response time ≤4h”, “On-time delivery 100.0%”
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has maintained Gold Supplier status for 9 years, which provides a meaningful platform credibility signal. Trade Assurance support further improves transaction protection for buyers using ’s platform mechanisms. The supplier also carries operational labels indicating response time within 4 hours and 100% on-time delivery. In addition, the supplier is marked as verified, which supports baseline compliance credibility. However, the available data does not specify detailed third-party audit reports, certification bodies, or industry-specific compliance certificates.

Scoring Rationale

The long Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance availability, and verified supplier status form a relatively complete platform credibility structure. Although there is insufficient data on detailed compliance certificates or factory audit documents, the platform indicators are strong and long-standing. This supports a high score, but not a perfect score due to limited visibility into certification depth.

Final Score

18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Final Score: 16 / 20

Basis

  • Orders in past 6 months: 100+
  • Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥270.4K+
  • Store rating: 4.7
  • Review count: 40+

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded more than 100 orders over the past six months, showing active transaction history. The transaction value of CN¥270.4K+ indicates measurable commercial activity, though the scale appears moderate rather than high-volume. A store rating of 4.7 suggests generally positive buyer satisfaction, while 40+ reviews provide some market validation. However, the review base is not large enough to fully confirm long-term consistency across a broad customer group.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows stable business activity, supported by a reasonable order count, visible transaction value, and a positive store rating. The 100+ six-month order figure suggests it has recurring commercial demand, but the transaction amount and review volume do not indicate a very high-volume supplier. Therefore, the supplier fits the “stable medium-scale transaction” range rather than the top performance tier.

Final Score

16 / 20

4. Service Capability

Final Score: 7 / 10

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤4h
  • Platform label: “Response time ≤4h”
  • Full Customization capability: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time is reported as within 4 hours, which indicates acceptable communication efficiency for standard procurement inquiries. This level of responsiveness is useful for quotation requests, order confirmation, and routine communication. However, there is no provided information confirming whether the supplier supports Full Customization, private labeling, packaging customization, material customization, or design-based customization.

Scoring Rationale

The response time is reasonable, but it does not meet the strongest service benchmark of response within one hour. In addition, customization capability is not confirmed in the available data. As a result, the supplier can be considered to have normal service responsiveness, but its broader service flexibility remains uncertain.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Final Score: 10 / 10

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 100.0%
  • Platform label: “On-time delivery 100.0%”

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is the strongest available delivery performance indicator in the provided data. For procurement of disposable slippers, delivery reliability is important because buyers such as hotels, spas, guest accommodation operators, and distributors may require stable replenishment. The reported delivery performance suggests strong execution on confirmed orders.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the supplier’s reported rate is 100.0%, it receives the maximum score for this dimension. No negative delivery data was provided.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Final Score: 15 / 20

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.7
  • Review count: 40+
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
  • Factory Verification: Supplier is marked as verified, but detailed factory verification scope is Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a store rating of 4.7, which indicates generally positive customer feedback. The 40+ review count gives some basis for evaluating buyer satisfaction, though it remains a moderate review volume rather than a large feedback pool. The verified supplier status supports baseline credibility, but no specific information is provided on Finished Product Inspection, internal quality control procedures, inspection reports, defect rates, or quality certifications.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has positive customer feedback and some verification support, which justifies a solid quality score. However, the lack of explicit Finished Product Inspection data and limited detail on factory verification prevent a higher score. The available evidence supports good basic quality reliability, but not a fully mature or transparent quality assurance system.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 12 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 18 / 20
Business Performance 16 / 20
Service Capability 7 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 15 / 20
Total Score 78 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

Guangzhou Shijingcheng Nonwoven Products Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking disposable slippers with relatively low MOQ requirements, especially for hotel, spa, Airbnb, guest accommodation, and home guest-use applications. The supplier shows strong platform credibility through 9 years of Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and a reported 100% on-time delivery rate.

The main risks are related to limited company scale and incomplete quality-control visibility. The factory area and staff count indicate a small-scale production base, and there is insufficient data on production capacity, Finished Product Inspection, detailed factory audit scope, product certifications, or customization capability. Buyers placing larger or specification-sensitive orders should request samples, quality inspection details, production capacity confirmation, and written order specifications before bulk purchasing.

Overall, the supplier has good platform reliability and stable transaction performance, with growth potential for small to medium-volume disposable slipper procurement, but it should be managed with clear quality and delivery controls.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Kunshan Huaxinhong Nonwoven Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kunshan Huaxinhong Nonwoven Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huzhou Yaojin Nonwoven Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huzhou Yaojin Nonwoven Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Pujiang Hg Nonwoven Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Pujiang Hg Nonwoven Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Jinglan Nonwoven Fabric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Jinglan Nonwoven Fabric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Wisekleen Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Wisekleen Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Galant Packaging Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Galant Packaging Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Huiming Fibre Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Huiming Fibre Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Tuoye Outdoor Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Tuoye Outdoor Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Magic Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Magic Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Mcycle Sports Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Mcycle Sports Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Chars Printing Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Chars Printing Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Aiifar Electronic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Aiifar Electronic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Sunshine Garden Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Sunshine Garden Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Duomi Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Duomi Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Huayue Inflatable Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Huayue Inflatable Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou J&H Storefixture Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou J&H Storefixture Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Sunnymed Limited Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Sunnymed Limited Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Lailina Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Lailina Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Saferlife Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Saferlife Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Deling Electron Technology Company Limited Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Deling Electron Technology Company Limited Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Hunan Qianjing Paper Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Qianjing Paper Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Mingfeng Industry& Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Mingfeng Industry& Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Yeqi Wiremesh Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Yeqi Wiremesh Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Linyi Zhuo Zhu New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Linyi Zhuo Zhu New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Zhongmaozhu Container Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Zhongmaozhu Container Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Jinwenhao Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Jinwenhao Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Zhongneng Zhihua Energy Equipment Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Zhongneng Zhihua Energy Equipment Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen  Maono Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Maono Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jens Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jens Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Lemin Welding Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Lemin Welding Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
T.O.P. Blacksmiths (Ningbo) Mechatronics Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
T.O.P. Blacksmiths (Ningbo) Mechatronics Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Yu. Pooling Wisdom Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Yu. Pooling Wisdom Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shengchi (Beijing) Water Treatment Equipment Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shengchi (Beijing) Water Treatment Equipment Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Slt Lighting Technology (Dongguan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Slt Lighting Technology (Dongguan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Mcmani Mineral Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Mcmani Mineral Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guilin Hemeisheng Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guilin Hemeisheng Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Eryin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Eryin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Cy Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Cy Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Kaibang Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Kaibang Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Mingou Cleaning Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Mingou Cleaning Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026