zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Guangzhou Chars Printing Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Supplier Evaluation Report: Guangzhou Chars Printing Products Co., Ltd.

Guangzhou Chars Printing Products Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Guangzhou Chars Printing Products Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Guangdong, offering customized textile-related products such as children’s hooded towels, poncho towels, infant hooded items, salon/beauty soft products, and personalized printed patterns. Based on the provided data, the supplier appears to be a small-scale but operationally active manufacturer, with a factory area of 630+㎡ and 10+ staff. It has Gold Supplier status for 3 years, supports Trade Assurance, and is listed as a verified supplier, which provides a reasonable level of platform credibility.

Commercial performance is relatively solid, with 200+ orders and CN¥1.2M+ transaction value in the past six months, supported by a 4.7 store rating and 20+ reviews. Delivery performance is strong, with a 94.7% on-time shipping rate. The supplier is most suitable for buyers seeking small-to-medium customized orders with moderate platform assurance. Key limitations include small factory scale, limited review volume, and insufficient data regarding Finished Product Inspection.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Score Weight: 20 points

Basis

  • Factory location: Guangdong, China
  • Factory area: 630+㎡
  • Employee count: 10+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Product portfolio includes customized children’s hooded towels, poncho towels, infant hooded products, salon/beauty soft products, and personalized printed items
  • MOQ for listed products: 100 pieces

Elaboration

The supplier has a relatively small physical production base, with a factory area of slightly over 630㎡ and a workforce of more than 10 employees. This indicates that the company is not positioned as a large-scale industrial manufacturer. However, the presence of a factory verification indicator suggests that the company has at least undergone a level of supplier verification, which improves confidence in its basic operational legitimacy.

The listed MOQ of 100 pieces across the provided product samples suggests the supplier is likely suited to flexible, small-batch, customized procurement rather than very large-volume mass production. Its product range is centered on customized textile or towel-related items, but the provided data does not include detailed information on production lines, monthly capacity, machinery, subcontracting structure, or quality control staffing.

Scoring Rationale

Given the small factory area and limited employee count, the supplier should not be assessed as a large-scale or highly mature production organization. However, the company does show basic production capability, a verified supplier status, and multiple listed customized product offerings. This supports a score within the “small but with basic production capability” range. The lack of detailed production capacity data prevents a higher score.

Final Score

11 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Score Weight: 20 points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 3 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Certification / industry tags:
  • Warranty available
  • ODM service available
  • Full customization
  • Response time ≤2h

Elaboration

The supplier has a reasonable platform credibility profile. It has been a Gold Supplier for 3 years, which indicates some continuity on the platform, though it is not a long-tenured supplier by platform standards. Trade Assurance availability is a positive factor because it gives buyers a transactional protection mechanism through the platform.

The verified supplier status strengthens credibility, as it suggests the supplier has passed some form of platform or third-party verification. The presence of tags such as warranty available, ODM service available, and full customization also supports the supplier’s commercial readiness. However, the provided data does not include specific international certifications, product safety certifications, factory audit reports, or compliance documents beyond the platform-related information.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has the core credibility elements expected from a reliable -based vendor: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, verification, and relevant service tags. However, the Gold Supplier history is only 3 years, and there is insufficient data on formal product or factory compliance certifications. Therefore, the supplier fits best into the category of having “core certifications complete but relatively shorter platform history,” rather than a fully mature long-term compliance profile.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Score Weight: 20 points

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 200+
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥1.2M+
  • Store rating: 4.7
  • Number of reviews: 20+

Elaboration

The supplier has demonstrated meaningful recent commercial activity. More than 200 orders over the past six months indicates active buyer engagement and regular transaction flow. A transaction value exceeding CN¥1.2M during the same period shows that the supplier has achieved a moderate level of sales performance.

The store rating of 4.7 is positive and suggests generally satisfactory buyer feedback. However, the number of reviews, at 20+, is still relatively limited compared with suppliers that have large-scale, long-term buyer validation. The combination of order volume and transaction value is stronger than the review base, meaning the supplier shows commercial traction but does not yet have a very broad customer feedback history in the provided data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier’s recent order volume and transaction value support a stable mid-level business performance assessment. The 4.7 rating is favorable, but the relatively small number of reviews limits the strength of buyer validation. This prevents the supplier from reaching the highest score band, which would require both high transaction activity and a larger review base.

Final Score

16 / 20

4. Service Capability

Score Weight: 10 points

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤2h
  • Full customization: Available
  • ODM service: Available
  • Warranty available: Yes

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates a practical service capability for customized orders. The response time of ≤2 hours is commercially acceptable and supports efficient pre-sales communication. The availability of full customization and ODM service is particularly relevant for buyers requiring personalized towel, hooded, poncho, infant, or printed-pattern products.

However, the service response time does not meet the strongest benchmark of ≤1 hour. In addition, the provided data does not include information on dedicated account managers, sample lead times, design support process, after-sales handling records, or complaint resolution performance. Therefore, while the supplier appears capable of handling customization-oriented inquiries, the depth and consistency of its service system cannot be fully verified.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has clear service advantages in customization and ODM availability, supported by a reasonable response time. Since the response time is ≤2 hours rather than ≤1 hour, and because additional service process details are not provided, the supplier fits the upper range of normal service capability rather than the top-tier service band.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Score Weight: 10 points

Basis

  • On-time shipping rate: 94.7%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time shipping rate of 94.7% is a strong performance indicator. According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 point range. This suggests that the supplier has maintained relatively reliable fulfillment performance for recent orders.

That said, the provided data does not include average lead time, production lead time by order size, peak-season capacity, logistics options, or historical delay reasons. Therefore, while the on-time shipping rate is clearly positive, delivery assessment is based only on the available shipping punctuality metric.

Scoring Rationale

A 94.7% on-time shipping rate demonstrates strong delivery reliability and places the supplier in the highest scoring band for this dimension. Because the rate is not near-perfect and additional delivery process details are unavailable, a strong but not maximum score is appropriate.

Final Score

9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Score Weight: 20 points

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.7
  • Review count: 20+
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
  • Factory Verification: Indicated through verified supplier status

Elaboration

The supplier has a positive store rating of 4.7, which indicates generally favorable customer satisfaction. The review count of 20+ provides some market feedback, but it is not a large sample size. As a result, the rating is useful but should be interpreted with caution, since broader buyer validation is not fully demonstrated by the available data.

The verified supplier status provides some assurance regarding supplier legitimacy and basic verification. However, the data does not confirm whether the supplier has Finished Product Inspection, internal QC procedures, third-party inspection arrangements, product testing capabilities, or documented quality certifications. These missing elements are important for buyers with strict quality control requirements, especially for customized products where consistency of material, printing, stitching, size, and finish may be important.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a good rating and some customer review history, supported by supplier verification. However, the review base is limited, and there is insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection or formal quality management systems. Therefore, the supplier should be considered to have acceptable but not fully proven quality assurance capability.

Final Score

14 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 11 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 16 / 20
Business Performance 16 / 20
Service Capability 8 / 10
Delivery Performance 9 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 14 / 20
Total Score 74 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional Cooperation Recommended

Guangzhou Chars Printing Products Co., Ltd. is recommended for buyers seeking small-to-medium volume customized textile or towel-related products, especially where MOQ flexibility, personalization, ODM availability, and platform transaction protection are important. The supplier’s 200+ orders and CN¥1.2M+ transaction value over the past six months indicate active commercial performance, while the 94.7% on-time shipping rate suggests reliable delivery execution.

The supplier is particularly suitable for: - Small and medium buyers testing customized products
- E-commerce sellers requiring low MOQ orders
- Buyers needing full customization or ODM support
- Procurement teams that prefer Trade Assurance protection

Main risks include: - Small factory scale with only 630+㎡ and 10+ staff
- Limited review base of 20+ reviews
- Insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection
- Insufficient data on formal product certifications or detailed QC systems
- Unclear production capacity for large-volume orders

Growth potential exists if the supplier continues increasing transaction volume, expands verified quality-control documentation, and provides more transparent factory, inspection, and compliance information. For initial cooperation, buyers should start with sample orders or controlled trial orders and use Trade Assurance where possible.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Guangzhou Chars Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Chars Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Licai Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Licai Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yuanming Printing (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yuanming Printing (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Jinguan Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Jinguan Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Shunhong Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Shunhong Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Galant Package Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Galant Package Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Xinhui Printing Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Xinhui Printing Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Guangli Paper Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Guangli Paper Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan New Printing Paper Products Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Hunan New Printing Paper Products Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Wisekleen Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Wisekleen Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Galant Packaging Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Galant Packaging Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Huiming Fibre Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Huiming Fibre Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Tuoye Outdoor Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Tuoye Outdoor Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Magic Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Magic Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Mcycle Sports Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Mcycle Sports Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Shijingcheng Nonwoven Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Shijingcheng Nonwoven Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Aiifar Electronic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Aiifar Electronic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Sunshine Garden Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Sunshine Garden Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Duomi Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Duomi Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Innovative Cloud Computer Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Innovative Cloud Computer Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Guangzhou Billions Imp.& Exp. Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Billions Imp.& Exp. Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Zhilv Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Zhilv Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Zhengcheng Commerce And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Zhengcheng Commerce And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Yuexin Construction Engineering Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Yuexin Construction Engineering Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Yuce Arts & Crafts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Yuce Arts & Crafts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Stone Cable Sales Depatrtment Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Stone Cable Sales Depatrtment Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Yinzhou Yuanjun Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Yinzhou Yuanjun Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Hengzhong Clean Energy Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Hengzhong Clean Energy Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Wochuan Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Wochuan Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Manni Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Manni Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Meisheng Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Meisheng Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Huayi Hat Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Huayi Hat Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanxi Rongshengchang Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanxi Rongshengchang Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangxi Kelv Environment Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangxi Kelv Environment Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Honghaosheng Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Honghaosheng Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
A-Knights Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
A-Knights Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Getech Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Getech Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Kebang Electric Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Kebang Electric Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hengxing Caps & Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hengxing Caps & Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongyang Dais Hardware Products Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongyang Dais Hardware Products Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026