zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

A-Knights Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

A-Knights Electronics Co., Ltd. is a Guangdong, China-based supplier with a reported factory area of 3,000+ m² and verified supplier status on the platform. The company lists customized cable and connector-related products with OEM/ODM-oriented descriptions and supports Trade Assurance, Finished Product Inspection, warranty availability, ODM service, and minor customization. Its platform credibility is supported by Gold Supplier status, though the membership duration is only 1 year. Commercial performance is currently limited, with only 2 orders and CN¥1.3K+ transaction value in the past six months, no available store rating, and 0 reviews. Service responsiveness is acceptable at ≤2 hours, and the reported on-time shipment rate is 100.0%, although this is based on a very small transaction base. Overall, this supplier may be suitable for low-risk trial orders, sampling, or early-stage OEM/ODM sourcing, but it requires further validation before being used for high-volume or mission-critical procurement.

A-Knights Electronics Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Company name: A-Knights Electronics Co., Ltd.
  • Country/Region: China, Guangdong
  • Factory area: 3,000+ m²
  • Employee count: Insufficient Data
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a disclosed factory area of over 3,000 m², which indicates a physical production base rather than a purely trading-oriented profile. The presence of verified supplier status adds a degree of credibility to the company’s operational existence and factory-related information. However, the employee count is not provided, and there is no detailed data regarding production lines, monthly output, equipment capacity, or internal quality staffing. These missing data points limit the ability to confirm whether the supplier can support stable medium- or large-scale production.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates basic manufacturing strength through its reported factory area and verified supplier status. However, the absence of employee count and detailed production capacity prevents it from being assessed as a clearly medium or large-scale stable supplier. The 3,000+ m² factory size suggests a small-to-medium production footprint, but the available evidence is not sufficient to confirm strong scalability. Therefore, the supplier fits best into the category of a small but operationally established factory with basic production capability.

Final Score

13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 1 year
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Certification / platform labels:
  • Warranty available
  • Finished product inspection
  • ODM service available
  • Minor customization

Elaboration

The supplier has several core platform trust elements, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. These indicators provide a basic level of platform-backed credibility and transactional protection. The presence of Finished Product Inspection and warranty-related labels also supports a more structured compliance profile. However, the Gold Supplier history is only 1 year, which means the supplier has limited platform tenure. No third-party management system certifications, product compliance certifications, or industry-specific certifications are provided in the dataset.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has the essential platform credibility markers, including Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, and verification. This makes it more credible than suppliers without platform safeguards. However, the short Gold Supplier duration and lack of disclosed external certifications reduce the overall compliance confidence. The certification label set is useful but not comprehensive enough to support a top-tier score.

Final Score

15 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 2
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥1.3K+
  • Store rating: Insufficient Data
  • Number of reviews: 0

Elaboration

The supplier’s recent platform transaction data is very limited. Only 2 orders were recorded in the past six months, with a transaction value of CN¥1.3K+, indicating a low level of publicly visible commercial activity. In addition, the absence of a store rating and the presence of 0 reviews make it difficult to assess buyer satisfaction, repeat purchasing behavior, or market acceptance through platform data.

Scoring Rationale

Business validation is one of the weakest areas for this supplier. While there is some transaction history, the order count and transaction amount are both low. The lack of customer reviews and unavailable store rating significantly limits confidence in proven commercial performance. The supplier may still be operational, but its platform sales record does not yet demonstrate stable or mature market traction.

Final Score

8 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤2h
  • ODM service available
  • Minor customization available
  • Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s stated response time of ≤2 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency for sourcing inquiries. The availability of ODM service and minor customization suggests that the company can support some degree of product adaptation. However, the data does not confirm full customization capability, engineering depth, design support, or dedicated project management resources.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates reasonable service responsiveness and some customization capability. However, because response time is not within the strongest ≤1 hour category and Full Customization is not confirmed, the service capability should be viewed as functional but not advanced. This makes the supplier suitable for standard customization or ODM-related inquiries, but buyers should verify technical support depth before complex development projects.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time shipment rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time shipment rate, which is a positive delivery indicator. According to the scoring standard, an on-time shipment rate above 90% qualifies for the highest scoring range. However, this delivery figure should be interpreted alongside the very low recent order volume, as only 2 orders were recorded in the past six months.

Scoring Rationale

Based strictly on the provided on-time shipment rate, the supplier performs strongly in delivery compliance. The 100.0% figure supports a full score under the defined delivery scoring standard. Nevertheless, the small transaction base means this result has limited statistical reliability and should be monitored through trial orders.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: Insufficient Data
  • Number of reviews: 0
  • Finished Product Inspection: Available
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Warranty available: True

Elaboration

The supplier has some quality-related platform labels, including Finished Product Inspection and warranty availability. Verified supplier status also supports a basic level of supplier legitimacy. However, customer feedback data is absent: there is no store rating and no reviews. This makes it difficult to evaluate real-world product consistency, complaint handling, customer satisfaction, or repeat buyer confidence.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has basic quality assurance indicators through Finished Product Inspection and warranty availability, which are positive. However, the absence of customer reviews and store rating prevents stronger validation of quality performance from actual buyers. The quality system appears to have platform-level support, but market feedback is insufficient. Therefore, the supplier should receive a moderate-low score in this category.

Final Score

12 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 13 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 15 / 20
Business Performance 8 / 20
Service Capability 7 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 12 / 20
Total Score 65 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional cooperation recommended for trial orders only.

A-Knights Electronics Co., Ltd. shows a legitimate supplier profile with a 3,000+ m² factory, verified supplier status, Trade Assurance support, Finished Product Inspection, warranty availability, ODM service, and minor customization. These factors make it a potentially suitable supplier for buyers seeking customized cable or connector-related products at a sampling or small-batch sourcing stage.

However, the supplier should not yet be treated as a fully validated high-volume procurement partner. The main risks are limited commercial proof, only 2 recent orders, low disclosed transaction value, 0 reviews, unavailable store rating, missing employee count, and insufficient data on production capacity. Although the 100.0% on-time shipment rate is positive, it is based on a small order base.

This supplier is most suitable for: - Trial orders
- Sample development
- Small-batch OEM/ODM sourcing
- Buyers requiring Trade Assurance protection
- Projects where supplier qualification can be verified step by step

Before scaling cooperation, buyers should request additional documents and evidence, including production capacity details, employee count, QC workflow, sample inspection records, and references from previous orders if available.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Postek Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Postek Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qyt Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qyt Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Manorshi Electronics Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Manorshi Electronics Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Jumboaudio Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jumboaudio Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tecoo Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tecoo Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Hxs Electronics Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Hxs Electronics Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianchang Trump Electronics Factory Supplier Evaluation
Tianchang Trump Electronics Factory Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Lesound Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Lesound Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Mestek Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Mestek Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Fangbei Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Fangbei Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ninghai Bright Electronics Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ninghai Bright Electronics Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Langtu Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Langtu Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Yitai Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Yitai Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Leadway Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Leadway Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Bluefinger Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Bluefinger Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Touchwo Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Touchwo Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Boluo Xurong Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Boluo Xurong Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Linkwin Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Linkwin Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Baolun Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Baolun Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Sanxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Sanxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Dongguan Cooling Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Cooling Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jinlixiang Composite Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jinlixiang Composite Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shuangfeng Xiangdong Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shuangfeng Xiangdong Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Shouweishen Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Shouweishen Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Aike Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Aike Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Yuqian Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Yuqian Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Zhongyi Electric Vehicle Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Zhongyi Electric Vehicle Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Huijue Technologies Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Huijue Technologies Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinan Forsun Cnc Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinan Forsun Cnc Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Dechuang Hardware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Dechuang Hardware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Sound Baby Star Acoustics Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Sound Baby Star Acoustics Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Lvjia  Air Conditioning Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Lvjia Air Conditioning Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Sunjet Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Sunjet Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Gaibo Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Gaibo Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guizhou Kewei Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guizhou Kewei Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Sanhe Power Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Sanhe Power Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Liang Shun Yu Kitchenware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Liang Shun Yu Kitchenware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanjing Lusuo Electromechanical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanjing Lusuo Electromechanical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Qi Shi Sports Products Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Qi Shi Sports Products Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Getogether Sujiao Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Getogether Sujiao Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026