Anping County Yeqi Wiremesh Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Anping County Yeqi Wiremesh Metal Products Co., Ltd. is a China-based wire mesh and metal products supplier located in Hebei, with a reported factory area of over 9,000㎡ and more than 30 staff. Its product scope includes perforated stainless steel wire mesh, aluminum expanded metal mesh, galvanized/nickel coated mesh, and customized bent or cut mesh products. The supplier shows a basic-to-moderate manufacturing foundation, supported by factory verification, Trade Assurance, finished product inspection, ODM service availability, and low MOQ customization labels. Business activity appears commercially validated, with 20+ orders and CN¥1M+ transaction value over the past six months. However, the review base is very limited, with only 1 customer review despite a 4.6 store rating. Overall, this supplier is suitable for buyers seeking small-to-medium batch customized wire mesh products with relatively low MOQ requirements, but buyers should conduct sample validation and clarify quality standards before placing larger or repeated orders.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
The supplier reports a factory area of 9,000+㎡, 30+ staff, and verified supplier status. The company is located in Hebei, China.

Elaboration:
A 9,000+㎡ facility indicates a meaningful physical production base for wire mesh and metal processing products. The employee count of 30+ suggests the company is not a large-scale industrial manufacturer, but it has enough workforce to support regular production, customization, and order fulfillment. The verified supplier status provides additional confidence that basic company and factory information has been checked on the platform.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier demonstrates a stable small-to-medium manufacturing profile rather than a large-scale supply chain operation. The factory area is relatively solid, but the staff size remains moderate. Because factory verification is present, the company should not be scored as weak or data-insufficient. However, the available data does not support classification as a large-scale supplier.

Final Score: 15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
The supplier is listed as an Gold Supplier for 1 year, supports Trade Assurance, has verified supplier status, and carries platform/industry labels including “Low MOQ for customization,” “Finished product inspection,” and “ODM service available.”

Elaboration:
The presence of Gold Supplier status and Trade Assurance gives the supplier basic platform credibility. Verified supplier status further supports reliability at the platform level. The certification and capability labels are relevant to procurement because they indicate some level of customization support, inspection process, and ODM service availability. However, the Gold Supplier history is only 1 year, which limits the depth of long-term platform credibility.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has most core platform credibility elements: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, verification, and useful service/inspection labels. The main limitation is the short Gold Supplier duration, which prevents a top-tier credibility score. The compliance profile is stronger than basic but not yet long-established.

Final Score: 16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
The supplier reports 20+ orders and CN¥1M+ transaction value in the past six months. Store rating is 4.6, with 1 review.

Elaboration:
The transaction value of CN¥1M+ and 20+ orders indicate that the supplier has completed measurable platform business recently. This suggests market activity and some buyer acceptance. However, the number of reviews is extremely limited, which reduces the reliability of the rating as a performance signal. A 4.6 rating is positive, but with only 1 review, it cannot be treated as broad customer validation.

Scoring Rationale:
Business performance is supported by recent transaction activity and meaningful sales value, but customer feedback volume is insufficient to confirm consistent buyer satisfaction. The supplier appears commercially active, yet not strongly proven through a large order base or broad review history.

Final Score: 15 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
The reported communication response time is ≤1 hour. Platform labels include “Low MOQ for customization” and “ODM service available.” Full Customization is not explicitly stated.

Elaboration:
A response time within one hour is a strong service indicator and suggests the supplier can communicate efficiently during inquiry, quotation, and order follow-up stages. The availability of ODM service and low MOQ customization supports flexibility for buyers requiring customized mesh specifications. However, because Full Customization is not explicitly provided in the data, that capability must be treated as Insufficient Data.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier deserves a strong service score due to fast response time and customization-related labels. The score is not placed in the highest band because Full Customization is not confirmed, and only limited service indicators are available.

Final Score: 8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate.

Elaboration:
A 100.0% on-time delivery rate is a strong delivery performance indicator. For procurement purposes, this suggests the supplier has demonstrated reliable shipment execution within the measured platform data. No additional delivery details, such as average lead time or logistics method, are provided.

Scoring Rationale:
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the reported rate is 100.0%, the supplier receives the maximum score for this dimension.

Final Score: 10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
The supplier has a 4.6 store rating, 1 review, “Finished product inspection” label, and verified supplier/factory-related status.

Elaboration:
The finished product inspection label is a positive quality-control signal, especially for metal mesh products where dimensions, coating, cutting, and finishing consistency can affect usability. Verified supplier status also supports baseline confidence in the supplier’s operational legitimacy. However, the review count is only 1, which is insufficient to establish a strong customer feedback pattern. The 4.6 rating is favorable but statistically weak due to the very small review base.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has basic quality assurance indicators, including finished product inspection and verification. However, the customer feedback base is too limited to justify a high score. The quality profile is acceptable but requires buyer-side confirmation through samples, inspection requirements, and pre-shipment checks.

Final Score: 15 / 20

Total Score

79 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with controlled procurement risk. This supplier is suitable for buyers seeking small-to-medium volume wire mesh, expanded metal mesh, perforated mesh, and customized metal mesh products with low MOQ requirements. It may be especially relevant for buyers who need ODM support or flexible customization at moderate order sizes.

Key risks include limited customer review evidence, only 1 year of Gold Supplier history, and insufficient data on Full Customization capability, production capacity output, lead times, and external certifications. Growth potential exists because the supplier already shows recent transaction activity, CN¥1M+ six-month sales, fast response time, Trade Assurance support, factory verification, and finished product inspection. For larger orders, buyers should request samples, confirm technical drawings/specifications, define inspection standards, and use Trade Assurance where applicable.