Anping County Baiyi Metal Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Anping County Baiyi Metal Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Hebei, focused on metal wire mesh-related poultry and animal cage products, including chicken broiler cages, pigeon trap cages, quail cage systems, rabbit floor matting, and outdoor poultry coops. Based on the provided data, the company has a 5,000+ m² factory area, 30+ staff, and verified supplier status, indicating basic to mid-scale manufacturing capability rather than a large-scale industrial supply base. Its platform credibility is strong, supported by 15 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, and a 100.0% on-time delivery tag. Business performance appears moderate, with 20+ orders and CN¥270.4K+ transaction value over the past six months, alongside a 4.8 store rating but only 7 reviews. This supplier appears suitable for small to medium-volume buyers seeking poultry or animal cage products with platform-backed transaction protection, while buyers requiring extensive quality documentation or large-scale capacity validation should request further evidence.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

• Factory location: Hebei, China
• Factory area: 5,000+ m²
• Employees: 30+ staff
• Verified supplier / factory-audited supplier: True
• Product scope includes poultry cages, pigeon trap cages, quail cage systems, rabbit floor matting, and outdoor poultry coops

Elaboration

The supplier has a documented physical factory area of more than 5,000 m² and a workforce of over 30 employees. This indicates an established production base with basic manufacturing capacity. The product portfolio is concentrated around wire mesh and animal cage-related products, which suggests operational focus within a defined product category rather than a highly diversified manufacturing model.

The verified supplier status strengthens the credibility of the company’s operating presence. However, the provided employee count is relatively modest, and there is no additional data on production lines, monthly capacity, equipment scale, export volume, or major customer references. Therefore, the company should be assessed as a small-to-medium production supplier rather than a large-scale supply chain partner.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates a real manufacturing base with a meaningful factory area and verified supplier status. The 5,000+ m² facility provides a reasonable foundation for production, but the 30+ staff count limits the assessment of large-scale production depth. Since there is no data on production capacity, machinery, or factory certifications beyond verification, the supplier does not reach the highest strength tier.

Final Score

14 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier tenure: 15 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Certification / platform tags: “Response time ≤3h”, “On-time delivery 100.0%”
• Verified supplier / factory-audited supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a long Gold Supplier history of 15 years, which is a strong platform credibility indicator. Trade Assurance support also improves buyer protection by offering a more secure transaction framework through the platform. The verified supplier status further supports the credibility of the company profile.

The provided platform tags show response time and delivery performance, but no independent product certifications, management system certifications, or industry-specific compliance certificates are listed. Therefore, while platform credibility is strong, compliance depth cannot be fully confirmed from the available data.

Scoring Rationale

A 15-year Gold Supplier record, Trade Assurance availability, and verified supplier status represent a strong platform-backed credibility profile. The supplier appears reliable from an transaction and platform verification perspective. However, because the data does not include detailed certification records or independent compliance documentation, the score is slightly below the maximum range.

Final Score

18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: 20+
• Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥270.4K+
• Store rating: 4.8
• Number of reviews: 7

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded more than 20 orders and more than CN¥270.4K in transaction value over the past six months. This shows that the company has recent commercial activity and has achieved measurable platform transactions. The 4.8 store rating is positive and indicates generally favorable buyer feedback.

However, the number of reviews is only 7, which limits the statistical reliability of the rating. The order volume and transaction amount suggest moderate business activity rather than high-volume platform performance. There is insufficient data on repeat buyers, export markets, major customers, or year-on-year sales growth.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has clear recent transaction evidence, a positive rating, and moderate order volume. This supports a stable but not high-scale commercial profile. The relatively low review count reduces the confidence level of the performance data, so the supplier fits best into the stable medium transaction category rather than the high-performance category.

Final Score

15 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤3h
• Platform tag: “Response time ≤3h”
• Full Customization: Insufficient Data
• Other customization capability: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of within three hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency for platform-based sourcing. This is a positive factor for buyers who require timely quotation follow-up, order discussion, or product clarification.

However, the data does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization, OEM, ODM, drawing-based production, packaging customization, or private-label services. As a result, the supplier’s customization capability cannot be fully evaluated. The service profile is therefore considered adequate for standard product sourcing, but not proven for complex customized procurement projects.

Scoring Rationale

The response speed is good, though not at the highest level of within one hour. Since Full Customization and broader customization services are not provided in the data, the supplier cannot be scored in the top service tier. The available evidence supports a normal service capability with responsive communication but limited confirmed customization depth.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 100.0%
• Platform tag: “On-time delivery 100.0%”

Elaboration

The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate is 100.0%, which is the strongest delivery indicator in the provided data. This suggests that completed platform orders have been shipped on schedule according to the platform’s delivery performance record.

There is no additional data on average lead time, production cycle, logistics options, peak-season delivery stability, or delivery performance by product category. Therefore, the assessment is based strictly on the provided on-time delivery rate.

Scoring Rationale

The 100.0% on-time delivery rate exceeds the 90% benchmark for the highest delivery performance tier. Although more logistics and lead-time data would provide a fuller picture, the available delivery metric is excellent and supports a full score within this dimension.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

• Store rating: 4.8
• Number of reviews: 7
• Verified supplier / factory-audited supplier: True
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
• Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided; detailed factory verification scope is Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s 4.8 store rating is positive and suggests buyer satisfaction among the available reviewers. The verified supplier status also provides some confidence that the supplier’s business profile has undergone platform-level verification.

However, the review count is limited at only 7, which reduces the reliability of the rating as a broad quality indicator. The provided data does not confirm Finished Product Inspection, quality control procedures, defect rate, testing standards, inspection reports, or product certifications. As a result, the supplier’s quality assurance system cannot be considered fully proven based on the available information.

Scoring Rationale

The high store rating and verified supplier status support a positive quality impression, but the small number of reviews and missing finished product inspection data limit confidence. The supplier shows basic quality credibility, but there is insufficient evidence to classify its quality assurance system as comprehensive or mature.

Final Score

14 / 20

Total Score

78 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with moderate confidence, especially for small to medium-volume buyers sourcing standard poultry cages, animal cages, wire mesh cage systems, or related accessories. The supplier has strong platform credibility, long Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and excellent reported on-time delivery performance.

The main risks are limited workforce scale, low review volume, insufficient data on finished product inspection, and lack of confirmed customization capability. Buyers with strict quality assurance requirements should request additional documents before placing larger orders, such as product inspection reports, production capacity details, quality control workflow, material specifications, and pre-shipment inspection options.

Overall, the supplier shows solid growth potential as a platform-verified, long-tenure supplier with stable recent transaction activity. It is best suited for buyers prioritizing platform transaction security, responsive communication, and standard product procurement rather than highly customized or certification-heavy sourcing programs.