Anping County Yuzhongwang Hardware Wire Mesh Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Executive Summary
Anping County Yuzhongwang Hardware Wire Mesh Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Hebei, with a reported factory area of 13,000+㎡, 50+ staff, and verified supplier status. Its listed products focus on wire mesh and related cage/mesh items, with MOQ levels generally around 100 sets or pieces. The supplier shows strong platform credibility, including 15 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and tags such as low MOQ for customization, warranty available, and finished product inspection. However, its recent commercial performance is weak based on the provided data: only 5 orders and CN¥13.5K+ transaction value in the past six months, with a low store rating of 2.7 and only 3 reviews. Delivery performance is strong with a 100.0% on-time shipment rate. Overall, this supplier may be suitable for buyers prioritizing verified factory background, platform credibility, and small-to-medium trial procurement, but quality feedback and recent transaction validation require caution.
Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength
Basis
- Factory location: Hebei, China
- Factory area: 13,000+㎡
- Employees: 50+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
Elaboration
The supplier has a measurable manufacturing base with a reported factory area exceeding 13,000㎡ and more than 50 staff. This indicates an operating facility with basic to moderate production capacity rather than a very small trading-only profile. The verified supplier status provides additional support that the company has passed some form of platform-related verification.
Scoring Rationale
The factory size is meaningful and the employee count suggests a stable operating team, but the available data does not indicate very large-scale staffing, multi-site production, annual capacity, automation level, or detailed production lines. Therefore, the company appears to be a medium-sized stable factory rather than a large-scale supply chain leader.
Final Score
15 / 20
2. Platform & Compliance Credibility
Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 15 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry tags: Low MOQ for customization, Warranty available, Finished product inspection
Elaboration
The supplier has a long Gold Supplier history of 15 years, which is a strong platform credibility indicator. Trade Assurance support adds transaction protection, while the listed tags show some commercial and inspection-related capabilities. The presence of finished product inspection is particularly relevant for procurement risk control.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates a complete and long-standing platform credibility profile through Gold Supplier status, long membership duration, Trade Assurance, and relevant platform tags. However, the data does not provide additional third-party management system certifications or detailed factory audit certificates beyond the supplied verification information.
Final Score
19 / 20
3. Business Performance
Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 5
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥13.5K+
- Store rating: 2.7
- Number of reviews: 3
Elaboration
Recent platform transaction activity is limited. Five orders and CN¥13.5K+ transaction value over six months indicate relatively low recent commercial traction. The store rating of 2.7 is weak, and the review base of only 3 comments is too small to provide strong market validation.
Scoring Rationale
Although the supplier has some completed transactions, the low order count, low transaction value, low rating, and limited review volume materially weaken commercial confidence. This dimension is the main constraint in the overall evaluation because the supplier lacks strong recent buyer validation in the provided data.
Final Score
8 / 20
4. Service Capability
Basis
- Communication response time: ≤3h
- Customization-related tag: Low MOQ for customization
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data
Elaboration
A response time within three hours suggests acceptable communication efficiency, though it does not reach the strongest service benchmark of response within one hour. The supplier has a “Low MOQ for customization” tag, which indicates some customization-related flexibility, but the data does not confirm Full Customization capability.
Scoring Rationale
Service capability appears functional but not premium. The response time is reasonable for normal sourcing communication, and the customization tag is positive. However, the absence of confirmed Full Customization prevents a higher score.
Final Score
7 / 10
5. Delivery Performance
Basis
- On-time shipment rate: 100.0%
Elaboration
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time shipment rate, which is the strongest delivery indicator provided. This suggests that, based on available platform data, the supplier has met delivery timing commitments for recorded orders.
Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time shipment rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the provided rate is 100.0%, the supplier receives the maximum score in this dimension.
Final Score
10 / 10
6. Quality & Customer Feedback
Basis
- Store rating: 2.7
- Number of reviews: 3
- Finished product inspection: Present in platform tags
- Factory verification / verified supplier: True
Elaboration
The supplier has some quality assurance indicators, including finished product inspection and verified supplier status. However, customer feedback data is weak. A 2.7 store rating is low, and only 3 reviews are available, which limits the reliability of customer satisfaction assessment.
Scoring Rationale
The presence of finished product inspection and supplier verification supports a basic quality control framework. However, the low rating and very limited review count prevent the supplier from being considered strong in customer feedback. Quality assurance exists, but buyer satisfaction evidence is insufficient and partly negative.
Final Score
11 / 20
Total Score
69 / 100
Procurement Recommendation
Cooperation is recommended only with caution. This supplier is suitable for buyers seeking verified factory background, long platform history, Trade Assurance protection, wire mesh-related products, and small-to-medium trial orders. The main risks are weak recent business performance, low store rating, and very limited review volume. Buyers should consider sample orders, clear specifications, pre-shipment inspection, and Trade Assurance terms before scaling procurement. Growth potential exists due to the supplier’s factory base, 15-year Gold Supplier status, 100.0% on-time shipment rate, and finished product inspection tag, but stronger customer feedback and higher transaction activity would be needed to support larger-volume sourcing.
Leave your comment