Shandong Menjie New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Shandong Menjie New Material Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Shandong, with a reported factory area of 81,000+ sqm and 170+ staff. The company presents a relatively strong manufacturing foundation, supported by verified supplier status and a long Gold Supplier history of 15 years. Its listed product portfolio includes chemical-related materials such as anthraquinone-related products, SLES 70, melamine, and catalyst-related items, with MOQ levels ranging from 100 kilograms to 1 metric ton.

From a procurement perspective, the supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking an established China-based chemical materials supplier with verified platform credibility and strong delivery performance. However, its recent commercial activity is limited, with only 6 orders and CN¥13.5K+ transaction value in the past six months. Customer feedback is positive but based on only 2 reviews, so quality confidence is not yet strongly validated by buyer volume. Overall, the supplier is recommended for cautious cooperation, especially sample orders, pilot procurement, or controlled-volume sourcing.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory area: 81,000+ sqm
- Employees: 170+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Factory location: Shandong, China

Elaboration
The supplier demonstrates a sizable physical manufacturing base, with an 81,000+ sqm factory area indicating meaningful production infrastructure. The workforce size of 170+ staff suggests the company has operational capacity beyond a small workshop. Verified supplier status further supports the credibility of the company’s stated factory presence. However, the data does not provide detailed information on production lines, annual output, equipment, laboratory facilities, or specific factory audit reports.

Scoring Rationale
The large factory area and verified supplier status support a strong score in this category. The employee count is solid but not exceptionally large, and the absence of detailed production capacity data prevents a maximum score. Based strictly on the available information, the company fits the profile of a stable mid-to-large supplier with credible factory infrastructure.

Final Score
18 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier history: 15 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification / industry label: “Response time ≤2h”

Elaboration
The supplier has a long platform history, with 15 years as a Gold Supplier, which is a strong indicator of sustained platform presence. Trade Assurance availability adds a transaction protection mechanism for buyers. Verified supplier status further improves credibility. However, the certification or industry label data only shows response time and does not include specific product certifications, management system certifications, chemical compliance documents, or third-party audit details.

Scoring Rationale
The combination of long Gold Supplier tenure, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status provides strong platform credibility. The score is not placed at the absolute maximum because compliance documentation and certification completeness are not sufficiently shown in the provided data.

Final Score
18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 6
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥13.5K+
- Store rating: 5.0
- Reviews: 2

Elaboration
The supplier has recorded recent platform transactions, but the scale is limited. Six orders over six months and CN¥13.5K+ transaction value indicate some buyer activity, but not a high-volume transaction profile. The 5.0 store rating is positive, yet the number of reviews is only 2, which limits the statistical reliability of the rating.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier shows valid but low commercial activity. The high rating supports confidence, but the low number of orders, low transaction value, and limited review base mean the business performance is not strongly validated by marketplace data. This supports a lower-mid score rather than a strong commercial performance score.

Final Score
12 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤2h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data
- Communication efficiency beyond response time: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier’s stated response time of within 2 hours indicates acceptable communication responsiveness. This is positive for inquiry handling and early-stage supplier communication. However, there is no provided evidence confirming Full Customization capability, dedicated technical support, multilingual support, sample handling efficiency, or after-sales service structure.

Scoring Rationale
A response time of ≤2h supports a reasonable service capability score, but it does not meet the highest benchmark of ≤1h response combined with strong customization capability. Because customization data is missing, the supplier cannot be scored as a high-service-capability supplier based on the available information.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is the strongest available indicator in the delivery category. This suggests that, based on the platform data provided, the supplier has fulfilled orders within expected delivery timelines. However, the delivery score should still be interpreted alongside the limited recent order count, since the performance is based on a relatively small transaction base.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring framework, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. A 100.0% rate supports the maximum score. The small order base is noted as a contextual limitation but does not change the direct scoring result under the delivery criterion.

Final Score
10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 5.0
- Reviews: 2
- Verified supplier / factory verification: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has a perfect store rating of 5.0, which is positive. However, the rating is based on only 2 reviews, so the customer feedback sample is very limited. Verified supplier status provides some confidence in the company’s legitimacy and factory background, but there is no provided evidence of Finished Product Inspection, third-party quality inspection records, product test reports, or formal quality management certifications.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier earns credit for a high rating and verified supplier status, but the low review count and missing Finished Product Inspection data limit confidence in consistent quality performance. The quality profile is therefore positive but not yet strongly proven through broad customer feedback or documented inspection systems.

Final Score
13 / 20

Total Score

78 / 100

• Company Strength: 18 / 20
• Platform & Compliance Credibility: 18 / 20
• Business Performance: 12 / 20
• Service Capability: 7 / 10
• Delivery Performance: 10 / 10
• Quality & Customer Feedback: 13 / 20

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with controlled risk management. Shandong Menjie New Material Co., Ltd. shows strong company scale, long platform history, verified supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and excellent reported delivery performance. These factors make it suitable for buyers seeking an established China-based supplier for chemical-related materials.

The supplier is best suited for: - Buyers requiring factory-backed chemical material sourcing - Small to medium-volume trial orders - Buyers who value platform credibility and Trade Assurance - Procurement teams able to conduct additional quality verification before bulk orders

Main risks: - Low recent transaction volume: only 6 orders in the past 6 months - Low transaction value: CN¥13.5K+ - Limited customer feedback: only 2 reviews - Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data - Product compliance certificates or industry certifications: Insufficient Data

Growth potential is moderate to strong. The supplier has a strong operational base and credible platform presence, but it needs more transaction history, broader customer feedback, and clearer quality documentation to be considered a lower-risk strategic supplier for large-scale procurement.