Anping County Tengde Metal Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Anping County Tengde Metal Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. is a China-based metal wire mesh supplier located in Hebei, with a reported factory area of 5,000+ square meters and 110+ staff. The supplier presents a moderate manufacturing base and has factory verification status, which supports a basic level of operational credibility. Its listed products focus on perforated metal, stainless steel wire mesh, architectural/decorative mesh, ventilation/protective barrier products, and related wire mesh items, with low MOQs ranging from 1 piece to 30 square meters depending on product type.

On platform indicators, the company is a 1-year Gold Supplier and supports Trade Assurance. Recent business activity shows 30+ orders and CN¥338K+ transaction value over the past six months, with a 4.9 store rating but only 7 reviews. The supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking small-to-medium volume sourcing, low MOQ purchases, and verified basic factory capability. However, its low on-time delivery rate of 61.1% is a major procurement risk.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Hebei, China
- Factory area: 5,000+ ㎡
- Employees: 110+ staff
- Factory verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a clearly stated manufacturing footprint, including a factory area above 5,000 square meters and a workforce above 110 employees. These figures indicate that the company is not a micro-scale operation and has a basic-to-moderate production organization. The presence of factory verification further strengthens the reliability of the company profile, as it provides some platform-backed confirmation of its operational existence and production setup.

However, the data does not include detailed production lines, monthly output, machinery list, capacity utilization, export markets, or major customer references. Therefore, while the company demonstrates tangible factory strength, the available information is not sufficient to classify it as a large-scale or highly mature supply chain operation.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier fits the profile of a medium-sized manufacturer with verified factory status, a reasonable factory area, and more than 100 staff. This supports a solid company strength score. The score is not placed in the highest range because the dataset lacks deeper production-scale evidence such as annual output, equipment quantity, production certifications, or large-scale supply records.

Final Score
16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 1 year
- Trade Assurance: True
- Factory verified supplier: True
- Certification/industry tags: “Low MOQ for customization”, “Response time ≤2h”, “On-time delivery 61.1%”

Elaboration
The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and factory verification. These elements provide a basic platform-backed trust framework for buyers. Trade Assurance is particularly relevant for international procurement because it may help reduce transaction risk during order placement and payment.

However, the Gold Supplier duration is only 1 year, which limits the supplier’s historical credibility on the platform. The certification/industry tags provided are operational labels rather than formal product or management system certifications. No ISO, product compliance certification, third-party audit certificate, or finished product inspection label is provided in the data. As a result, the compliance profile is acceptable but not comprehensive.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has core platform credibility elements, including Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, and factory verification. This supports a score in the stable but not premium range. The short Gold Supplier history and lack of formal certification information prevent a higher score.

Final Score
15 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Past 6 months orders: 30+
- Past 6 months transaction amount: CN¥338K+
- Store rating: 4.9
- Reviews: 7

Elaboration
The supplier has visible transaction activity over the past six months, with more than 30 orders and transaction value exceeding CN¥338K. This indicates that the store has real recent buyer engagement and some level of commercial validation. The 4.9 store rating is strong and suggests positive buyer satisfaction among recorded transactions.

The main limitation is the small number of reviews, with only 7 available. While the rating is high, the review base is limited, meaning the reliability of the rating is less robust than suppliers with hundreds or thousands of reviews. The order volume and transaction value suggest moderate activity rather than high-volume platform performance.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier shows stable but not high-scale business performance. The transaction value and order count are meaningful for a smaller or medium supplier, and the rating is strong. However, limited review volume reduces confidence in long-term commercial consistency.

Final Score
15 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤2h
- Platform tag: “Low MOQ for customization”
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier’s response time is listed as within 2 hours, which is acceptable for sourcing communication and indicates reasonable responsiveness. The platform tag also suggests low MOQ availability for customization, which may benefit buyers requiring sample orders, trial purchases, or small customized batches.

However, the data does not confirm Full Customization capability. It also does not provide details about engineering support, design modification ability, OEM/ODM services, sample lead time, or dedicated account management. Therefore, the supplier’s service capability can be assessed as functional but not fully proven for complex customization projects.

Scoring Rationale
The response time is good, though not within the strongest ≤1 hour benchmark. The low MOQ customization tag is positive, but the absence of confirmed Full Customization data limits the score. The supplier appears suitable for basic communication and potentially simple customization needs, but not yet proven for highly customized procurement.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 61.1%

Elaboration
The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is 61.1%, which is significantly below the 70% threshold used for acceptable delivery performance. This is the weakest area in the supplier profile. For procurement teams, such a delivery record may create risks related to delayed project timelines, inventory shortages, production scheduling disruption, and higher follow-up management workload.

Because the data does not provide reasons for the low on-time delivery rate, such as order complexity, logistics constraints, or seasonal delays, the analysis must be limited to the stated figure. Based strictly on the available data, delivery reliability is a major concern.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate below 70% falls into the lowest scoring band. At 61.1%, the supplier demonstrates weak delivery performance and should be carefully managed through confirmed lead times, written delivery commitments, and staged procurement if cooperation proceeds.

Final Score
4 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.9
- Reviews: 7
- Factory verification: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has a high store rating of 4.9, which is a positive quality and customer satisfaction indicator. Factory verification also provides some confidence that the supplier has a real production base. These factors support a reasonable baseline level of quality credibility.

However, the number of reviews is only 7, which is too limited to strongly validate consistent product quality across multiple buyers and order types. In addition, there is no provided evidence of Finished Product Inspection, formal quality management certification, product testing reports, or third-party inspection history. Therefore, the quality assessment is positive but not deeply substantiated.

Scoring Rationale
The high rating supports a favorable score, but the limited review count and lack of finished product inspection data prevent a higher evaluation. The supplier has basic quality credibility, mainly supported by rating and factory verification, but quality assurance systems remain insufficiently documented.

Final Score
14 / 20

Total Score

71 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended for buyers seeking metal wire mesh products with low MOQ flexibility, moderate factory scale, and basic platform protection. The supplier appears more suitable for small-to-medium volume buyers, trial orders, sample-based sourcing, and buyers who can tolerate additional delivery monitoring.

The main procurement risk is delivery reliability, as the on-time delivery rate is only 61.1%. Another risk is limited quality validation due to only 7 reviews and insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection or formal quality certifications. Buyers should avoid placing urgent or time-sensitive bulk orders without confirming production schedule, lead time, packaging requirements, and shipment milestones in writing.

The supplier’s growth potential is supported by its verified factory status, 110+ staff, 5,000+ ㎡ facility, Trade Assurance support, and recent transaction activity. If delivery performance improves and more quality assurance evidence becomes available, the supplier could become a stronger candidate for recurring procurement.