zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Dongguan Chelv Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Dongguan Chelv Industry Co., Ltd. is a Guangdong-based supplier focused on wiper blade products, including universal wiper blades, OEM/ODM wiper blade listings, and customized-design windshield wiper products. Based on the provided data, the company shows a medium-scale manufacturing profile with a 5,200+ sqm factory area, 110+ staff, and verified supplier status. Its platform credibility is relatively strong, supported by 6 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, and visible operational tags such as response time within 2 hours and 96.7% on-time delivery. Business performance appears stable, with 100+ orders and CN¥540.9K+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.9 store rating and 60+ reviews. The supplier is suitable for small to mid-sized buyers seeking wiper blade products with low MOQ options and stable delivery performance. Key limitations include insufficient data on formal product inspection systems, detailed factory certifications, and confirmed full customization capability.

Detailed Analysis

  1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Guangdong, China
- Factory area: 5,200+ sqm
- Employees: 110+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
Dongguan Chelv Industry Co., Ltd. demonstrates a moderate manufacturing base. A 5,200+ sqm facility and 110+ staff indicate that the supplier has more than a small workshop-level operation and should have basic production organization, staffing, and facility capacity. The verified supplier status further supports the credibility of its manufacturing presence.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier fits the profile of a medium-sized stable factory rather than a large-scale industrial manufacturer. The factory area and employee count are solid, but the data does not show very large production scale, annual capacity, automated production lines, or detailed factory certifications. Therefore, the score should reflect stable production capability with some limitations due to incomplete scale and certification data.

Final Score
16 / 20

  1. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 6 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry tags: “Response time ≤2h”, “On-time delivery 96.7%”
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a meaningful platform history, with 6 years as a Gold Supplier and Trade Assurance support. These factors provide a stronger level of platform-backed credibility than a newly listed or non-verified supplier. The verified supplier status further strengthens trust, while the response and delivery tags provide additional operational transparency.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has the core credibility elements: Gold Supplier status, multi-year platform presence, Trade Assurance, and verification. However, the provided certification/industry tags are operational rather than formal product or factory compliance certifications. Because detailed compliance certificates are not provided, the supplier does not reach the highest possible score, but it remains strong in platform credibility.

Final Score
18 / 20

  1. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 100+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥540.9K+
- Store rating: 4.9
- Reviews: 60+

Elaboration
The supplier has visible recent commercial activity, with over 100 orders and more than CN¥540.9K in transaction value during the past six months. This shows that the supplier is not inactive and has received market validation through completed transactions. The 4.9 rating and 60+ reviews indicate generally positive buyer feedback, although the review volume is not extremely large.

Scoring Rationale
The business data supports a stable mid-level trading profile. The order count and transaction value are credible, and the rating is strong. However, the transaction scale and review volume do not indicate a very high-volume supplier. The score therefore reflects reliable but not top-tier marketplace performance.

Final Score
16 / 20

  1. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤2h
- Product listings include OEM/ODM and customized-design wording
- Full Customization capability: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of within 2 hours suggests acceptable communication efficiency for online procurement. Product titles indicate OEM/ODM and customized-design wiper blade offerings, but the provided data does not include a formal “Full Customization” capability tag or confirmed customization service details.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier performs well on response speed, but it does not meet the highest service tier because the criterion for 9–10 points requires response within 1 hour and strong customization capability. Since the response time is within 2 hours and formal Full Customization data is insufficient, the supplier is best assessed as having normal-to-good service capability rather than advanced service strength.

Final Score
7 / 10

  1. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 96.7%

Elaboration
The supplier’s 96.7% on-time delivery rate is a strong indicator of fulfillment reliability. This performance level is above the 90% threshold and suggests that the supplier has effective order handling and shipment management based on the provided platform data.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. At 96.7%, the supplier is clearly within the highest delivery performance range. The score is near full marks because the data directly supports strong delivery reliability.

Final Score
10 / 10

  1. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.9
- Reviews: 60+
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Supported by verified supplier status, but detailed factory verification scope is Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has a strong store rating of 4.9 and more than 60 reviews, which indicates generally positive customer feedback. The verified supplier status adds a basic level of confidence regarding company legitimacy. However, the provided data does not confirm whether the supplier has Finished Product Inspection or detailed quality inspection systems.

Scoring Rationale
The high rating supports a positive quality perception, and the review base is meaningful though not very large. The absence of confirmed Finished Product Inspection data limits the quality assurance assessment. Therefore, the supplier should receive a good but not excellent score, reflecting positive buyer feedback with incomplete formal quality control evidence.

Final Score
16 / 20

Total Score

83 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommended with controlled cooperation.

Dongguan Chelv Industry Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking wiper blade products from a medium-scale Chinese supplier with stable platform credibility, low MOQ options, good recent transaction activity, and strong delivery performance. It is especially suitable for small to mid-sized importers, aftermarket auto parts distributors, e-commerce sellers, and buyers who require flexible order quantities.

Main risks: - Insufficient Data on Finished Product Inspection and detailed quality control procedures. - Insufficient Data on formal product certifications or factory management certifications. - Full Customization capability is not formally confirmed, despite OEM/ODM-related product listing wording. - Review count is positive but not large enough to fully validate long-term large-volume performance.

Growth potential: The supplier shows good platform maturity, reliable delivery, and stable commercial activity. If it can provide clearer inspection reports, certification documents, customization capability details, and production capacity data, it could become a stronger candidate for larger or more compliance-sensitive procurement programs.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Dongguan Soushine Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Soushine Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Minxin Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Minxin Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Rich Industry Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Rich Industry Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Wenjin Industry Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Wenjin Industry Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Huimei Hardware Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Huimei Hardware Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Jiesheng Hardware Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Jiesheng Hardware Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Huan Lin Magnetic Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Huan Lin Magnetic Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Goldensign Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Goldensign Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Japan Aladdin Industry Limited Supplier Evaluation
Japan Aladdin Industry Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Mingko Industry Corporation Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Mingko Industry Corporation Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Sengelin Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Sengelin Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Mh Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Mh Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Leton Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Leton Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Rst Electric Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Rst Electric Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Vestar International Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Vestar International Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Rofee Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Rofee Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anshan Zhongjda Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anshan Zhongjda Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Haining Longtime Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Haining Longtime Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Senwo Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Senwo Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Zhongxinhe Assembled Housing Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Zhongxinhe Assembled Housing Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Shandong Jinxiang Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Jinxiang Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Yongwei Metal Produce Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Yongwei Metal Produce Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Mento Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Mento Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenling Haifeng Differential Gear Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenling Haifeng Differential Gear Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yangzhou Pujiang Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yangzhou Pujiang Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Aite Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Aite Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Casun Technologies Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Casun Technologies Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Maidou Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Maidou Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sdlanch Intelligent Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sdlanch Intelligent Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Wogong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Wogong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Liaocheng Motong Equipments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Liaocheng Motong Equipments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Gt Commodity Factory Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Gt Commodity Factory Supplier Evaluation
Henan Lavers Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Lavers Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kong Seng Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kong Seng Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Yucai Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Yucai Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Nihewan Agricultural Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Nihewan Agricultural Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shuangni Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shuangni Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Belifine Battery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Belifine Battery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Twinjet Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Twinjet Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Taiweite Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Taiweite Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026