Vestar International Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Supplier Evaluation Report: Vestar International Industry Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary
Vestar International Industry Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Shandong, offering refrigerator-related products including side-by-side refrigerators, worktop refrigerators, mini refrigerators, built-in refrigerators, and smart inverter refrigerator models. Based on the available data, the company appears to be a small-scale supplier with a reported factory area of over 1,000㎡ and more than 20 staff, but it has platform credibility supported by 9 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, and verified supplier status. Its recent business performance shows over 10 orders and CN¥1.2M+ transaction value in the past six months, indicating some commercial activity, though the review base is limited with only 4 reviews. Delivery performance is strong, with a stated 100.0% on-time delivery rate. This supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking refrigerator products with low MOQ options and platform-backed transaction protection, while larger-volume buyers should further verify production capacity and quality control systems before committing to scale orders.
Detailed Analysis
1. Company Strength
Basis
- Company name: Vestar International Industry Co., Ltd.
- Location: Shandong, China
- Factory area: 1,000+㎡
- Employees: 20+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
Elaboration
The supplier has a reported factory area of over 1,000㎡ and more than 20 staff members. This indicates that the company has a physical operational base and a basic workforce, but the scale remains relatively small compared with larger industrial manufacturers. The presence of verified supplier status provides a degree of confidence that the company’s basic business and facility information has undergone some form of platform verification.
However, the available data does not provide details on annual production capacity, number of production lines, equipment configuration, in-house testing facilities, warehouse capacity, or specific factory certifications. Therefore, the supplier’s actual manufacturing depth and scalability cannot be fully confirmed from the provided information.
Scoring Rationale
The company demonstrates basic production capability through its factory area, employee count, and verified supplier status. However, the reported scale of 1,000+㎡ and 20+ staff suggests a small-sized operation rather than a large or mid-sized manufacturing base. Because no detailed production scale or factory certification information is provided, the score should remain within the “small but with basic production capability” range.
Final Score
12 / 20
2. Platform & Compliance Credibility
Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 9 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry tags:
- On-time delivery 100.0%
- Response time ≤2h
- Verified supplier: True
Elaboration
The supplier has maintained Gold Supplier status for 9 years, which indicates a relatively long operating history on the platform. Trade Assurance support provides buyers with a transaction protection mechanism, which is important for cross-border procurement risk control. The supplier is also marked as verified, adding another layer of platform credibility.
The listed platform tags show operational performance in response and delivery, but the data does not include detailed third-party product certifications, management system certifications, or factory audit certificates. Therefore, while the platform credibility is strong, the broader compliance documentation is not fully visible from the available data.
Scoring Rationale
A 9-year Gold Supplier record, Trade Assurance availability, and verified supplier status represent strong platform credibility. These factors support supplier reliability from a platform-compliance perspective. However, because no specific product certifications, factory audit documents, or industry compliance certificates are provided, the score should not be placed at the absolute maximum level.
Final Score
18 / 20
3. Business Performance
Basis
- Orders in the past 6 months: 10+
- Transaction amount in the past 6 months: CN¥1.2M+
- Store rating: 5.0
- Number of reviews: 4
Elaboration
The supplier has recorded more than 10 orders and over CN¥1.2M in transaction value during the past six months. This suggests that the supplier has active commercial transactions and has generated measurable sales through the platform. The 5.0 store rating is positive, indicating that existing reviewed buyers have provided favorable feedback.
However, the order count is not high, and the number of reviews is limited to 4. This means the buyer feedback sample is small, reducing the statistical strength of the rating. The CN¥1.2M+ transaction value is a positive indicator, but the limited number of orders and reviews suggests that the supplier’s commercial validation is moderate rather than extensive.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier shows real business activity, with meaningful transaction value and a perfect rating. However, the order count and review count are both relatively limited, so the commercial track record is not broad enough to support a high-performance classification. The score is therefore positioned in the stable but moderate business performance range.
Final Score
14 / 20
4. Service Capability
Basis
- Communication response time: ≤2h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data
Elaboration
The supplier’s stated response time of ≤2 hours indicates a reasonably responsive communication capability. This is beneficial for inquiry handling, quotation follow-up, and order coordination. Fast response is especially important in cross-border sourcing, where communication delays can affect sampling, contract confirmation, and shipment arrangements.
However, the provided data does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization, OEM, ODM, private labeling, packaging customization, or engineering modification. As customization capability is a key part of the service capability scoring dimension, this lack of information limits the assessment.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier performs well in response speed, though it does not meet the highest benchmark of ≤1 hour. More importantly, customization capability is not confirmed in the provided data. Therefore, the supplier should be assessed as having normal service responsiveness, but with insufficient evidence to classify it as a strong customization-capable supplier.
Final Score
7 / 10
5. Delivery Performance
Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%
Elaboration
The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is listed as 100.0%, which is a strong indicator of shipment reliability based on available platform data. Consistent delivery performance is critical for buyers managing inventory planning, retail launch schedules, project delivery, or distribution commitments.
No additional data is provided regarding average lead time, peak-season fulfillment capacity, logistics partners, or historical delayed shipment cases. Therefore, the evaluation is based strictly on the reported on-time delivery rate.
Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 point range. Since the supplier’s stated on-time delivery rate is 100.0%, it meets the highest delivery performance bracket. The score is therefore assigned at the maximum level for this dimension.
Final Score
10 / 10
6. Quality & Customer Feedback
Basis
- Store rating: 5.0
- Number of reviews: 4
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided
Elaboration
The supplier has a 5.0 store rating, which is positive, but the number of reviews is only 4. This means the available customer feedback is favorable but limited in volume. A small review sample cannot fully demonstrate long-term consistency in product quality, after-sales handling, or defect control.
The supplier is identified as verified, which supports basic trust in its business and factory information. However, there is no provided evidence of Finished Product Inspection, product quality certifications, in-house QC processes, defect rate records, or third-party inspection reports. As a result, the supplier has some quality-related credibility, but the quality assurance system cannot be fully validated from the current data.
Scoring Rationale
The 5.0 rating supports a positive quality impression, and verified status provides basic assurance. However, the very limited review count and absence of confirmed Finished Product Inspection information prevent a higher score. The supplier fits the “good rating with basic quality assurance indicators, but limited feedback volume” category.
Final Score
14 / 20
Total Score
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Company Strength | 12 / 20 |
| Platform & Compliance Credibility | 18 / 20 |
| Business Performance | 14 / 20 |
| Service Capability | 7 / 10 |
| Delivery Performance | 10 / 10 |
| Quality & Customer Feedback | 14 / 20 |
| Total Score | 75 / 100 |
Procurement Recommendation
Recommendation: Conditional Cooperation Recommended
Vestar International Industry Co., Ltd. is recommended for cautious cooperation, especially for buyers seeking refrigerator products with platform protection, low MOQ options, and strong delivery performance. The supplier’s 9-year Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, CN¥1.2M+ recent transaction value, and 100.0% on-time delivery rate are positive procurement indicators.
Suitable customer types:
- Small to medium buyers seeking refrigerator products
- Buyers requiring low MOQ trial orders
- Importers or distributors who value Trade Assurance protection
- Buyers prioritizing delivery reliability and responsive communication
Main risks:
- Small factory scale based on 1,000+㎡ and 20+ staff
- Limited review base with only 4 reviews
- Insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection
- Insufficient data on customization capability
- Insufficient data on production capacity, certifications, and detailed QC systems
Growth potential:
The supplier shows promising platform credibility and transaction activity, but further validation is required before large-scale procurement. Buyers should request factory audit reports, quality inspection procedures, product compliance documents, production capacity details, and sample testing before placing bulk or long-term orders.
Leave your comment