zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Shanghai Senwo Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Shanghai Senwo Industry Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Shanghai, with a reported factory area of over 20,000 m² and more than 120 staff. Based on the provided product data, the company focuses on medical and personal-care cooling products, including custom medical cooling packs, gel bead ice products, postpartum cooling pads, cold compression sleeves, and reusable gel packs. The supplier shows solid platform credibility, supported by 13 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, verified supplier status, and platform labels such as Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, Socially Responsible, and response time ≤5h. Its recent business performance is moderate to stable, with 60+ orders and CN¥1.3M+ transaction value in the past six months, alongside a 4.9 store rating from 30+ reviews. The supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking established, mid-scale production capability with customization support, though delivery punctuality and limited review volume should be monitored.

Shanghai Senwo Industry Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

  • Factory location: Shanghai, China
  • Factory area: 20,000+ m²
  • Employees: 120+ staff
  • Verified supplier / factory verification status: True

Elaboration

The reported factory size of more than 20,000 m² indicates a relatively substantial manufacturing footprint. The employee base of 120+ staff suggests the company has more than a small workshop-level operation and likely maintains basic organizational capacity for production, order handling, and operational support. The supplier is also marked as verified, which adds credibility to the stated company profile.

However, the available data does not include detailed information on production lines, monthly capacity, machinery, factory layout, export volume, or specific factory management certifications. Therefore, while the supplier demonstrates clear mid-scale physical and staffing capacity, there is insufficient data to classify it as a large-scale fully validated industrial manufacturer.

Scoring Rationale

The company has meaningful factory area and a reasonable employee base, which supports a stable production capability. The verified supplier status further strengthens its credibility. However, because the provided data does not include detailed production capacity, equipment lists, or formal factory management certifications, the company should be assessed as a medium-sized stable factory rather than a fully proven large-scale supply chain operator.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 13 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Platform / industry labels:
  • Socially responsible
  • Finished product inspection
  • Full customization
  • Response time ≤5h

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong platform history, with 13 years as a Gold Supplier. This is a significant indicator of long-term platform presence and continuity. Trade Assurance support provides buyers with an additional transaction protection mechanism through the platform. The verified supplier status also adds credibility to the supplier profile.

The presence of platform labels such as Socially Responsible, Finished Product Inspection, and Full Customization improves the supplier’s compliance and operational profile. However, the provided information does not include specific third-party certificates, product compliance documents, ISO certifications, medical device certifications, or export-market regulatory approvals. Therefore, the assessment should remain limited to platform-based credibility and the provided verification indicators.

Scoring Rationale

This supplier performs strongly in platform credibility due to its long Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance availability, verified supplier status, and multiple operational labels. The 13-year Gold Supplier duration is particularly positive. The score is not a perfect 20 because the supplied data does not provide detailed formal certification documents or market-specific compliance evidence beyond platform tags.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

  • Orders in past 6 months: 60+
  • Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥1.3M+
  • Store rating: 4.9
  • Number of reviews: 30+

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded more than 60 orders over the past six months, with transaction value exceeding CN¥1.3M. This indicates active commercial performance and a measurable transaction history. The 4.9 store rating is strong and suggests generally positive buyer satisfaction. However, the review count of 30+ is not extremely large, meaning the customer feedback base is still relatively limited compared with suppliers that have hundreds or thousands of reviews.

The transaction value and order count demonstrate stable business activity, but the data does not show repeat customer ratio, export destinations, major customers, annual revenue, or long-term purchasing trends. Therefore, the supplier’s business performance can be considered solid but not yet sufficient to classify as high-volume market-leading performance based only on the provided figures.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a healthy recent transaction record, including 60+ orders and CN¥1.3M+ in six-month transaction value. Combined with a high 4.9 rating, this supports a positive business performance assessment. The score remains in the mid-to-high range rather than the top tier because order volume and review volume are moderate, and there is insufficient data on long-term commercial scale or customer retention.

Final Score

16 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤5h
  • Full Customization label: Present

Elaboration

The supplier supports Full Customization according to the platform label, which is valuable for buyers requiring customized product specifications, branding, packaging, or product adaptation. The response time is listed as ≤5h, which indicates a reasonable communication standard for platform-based sourcing.

However, the response time does not meet the strongest service benchmark of ≤1 hour. The provided data also does not include information about English communication capability, dedicated account managers, sample lead time, design support, engineering support, after-sales process, or complaint resolution efficiency. Therefore, the service capability appears practical and usable, but not fully proven as premium-level service.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates acceptable service capability due to its Full Customization support and response time within five hours. This is suitable for buyers requiring customization and normal communication efficiency. The score is not higher because the response speed is not within the top-tier ≤1h range, and there is insufficient data on deeper service resources such as technical support or structured after-sales handling.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 82.7%

Elaboration

The reported on-time delivery rate of 82.7% places the supplier within the 80%–89% performance band. This indicates that the supplier generally meets delivery commitments but still has a measurable risk of shipment delays. For buyers with flexible timelines, this level may be manageable. For buyers requiring strict launch schedules, seasonal delivery windows, or just-in-time replenishment, this delivery performance should be monitored carefully.

The provided data does not include average production lead time, shipping methods, delay causes, peak season capacity, or historical delivery trend. Therefore, the evaluation is based strictly on the stated on-time delivery rate.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate between 80% and 89% falls within the 7–8 point range. At 82.7%, the supplier is above the minimum acceptable level but not close to the 90%+ high-performance benchmark. A score of 7 reflects moderate delivery reliability with room for improvement.

Final Score

7 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.9
  • Review count: 30+
  • Finished Product Inspection label: Present
  • Verified supplier / factory verification status: True

Elaboration

The supplier’s 4.9 store rating is a positive indicator of customer satisfaction. The Finished Product Inspection label suggests that the supplier has some form of final product inspection process recognized on the platform. The verified supplier status also supports the reliability of the supplier profile.

However, the number of reviews is 30+, which is useful but not large enough to fully validate quality consistency across a broad customer base. The data also does not include defect rates, inspection reports, product test results, return rates, complaint records, or internationally recognized quality certifications. Therefore, while quality feedback appears positive, the available evidence is not comprehensive enough to assign a top-tier quality score.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier deserves a strong quality score due to its high 4.9 rating, Finished Product Inspection label, and verified status. Nevertheless, the limited review count and absence of detailed quality documentation prevent a higher rating. The quality profile is positive and suitable for sourcing consideration, but buyers should still conduct sample testing and order-specific inspection before scaling.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 16 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 19 / 20
Business Performance 16 / 20
Service Capability 8 / 10
Delivery Performance 7 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 16 / 20
Total Score 82 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for selective cooperation, especially for buyers seeking customized cooling and gel-based personal care products from a mid-scale verified supplier.

Shanghai Senwo Industry Co., Ltd. shows strong platform credibility, a long Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and relevant operational labels such as Full Customization and Finished Product Inspection. Its factory area and staff size suggest stable medium-scale production capability, while its recent transaction data confirms active business operations.

Suitable customer types include:
- Buyers looking for custom cooling packs, gel ice products, maternity cooling pads, or compression cooling products
- Small to medium-sized importers requiring moderate MOQ options
- Brands needing customization support with platform transaction protection
- Buyers who value supplier history and Trade Assurance coverage

Main risk points:
- On-time delivery rate is 82.7%, which is acceptable but not top-tier
- Review count is only 30+, limiting the depth of customer feedback validation
- Insufficient Data on detailed production capacity, machinery, export markets, formal product certifications, defect rate, and testing records

Growth potential:
The supplier has a solid foundation due to its verified status, 13-year Gold Supplier record, customization capability, and active transaction history. If delivery punctuality improves and more quality documentation becomes available, the supplier could become a stronger candidate for larger or more compliance-sensitive procurement programs.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Shanghai Rofee Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Rofee Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Weijue Industry Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Weijue Industry Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Fupower Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Fupower Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Chongfu Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Chongfu Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Hdmann Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Hdmann Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Hoho Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Hoho Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Galaxyfiber Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Galaxyfiber Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Suntung Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Suntung Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Qishen Plastic Industry Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Qishen Plastic Industry Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Qishen Plastic Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Qishen Plastic Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Hanwei Aluminum Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Hanwei Aluminum Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai M&G Stationery Inc. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai M&G Stationery Inc. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Pdyear Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Pdyear Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sinowell (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sinowell (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Langjue Mould Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Langjue Mould Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Kmcable Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Kmcable Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Yonghengsheng Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Yonghengsheng Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongyu Industrial (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongyu Industrial (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Xinding Coatings Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Xinding Coatings Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shantou Jiarong Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shantou Jiarong Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Guangzhou Qili Environmental Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Qili Environmental Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Hemei Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Hemei Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Winbang Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Winbang Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Bolida Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Bolida Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Taisheng Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Taisheng Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Eego Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Eego Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Baojieyuan International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Baojieyuan International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Ziri Electrical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Ziri Electrical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Aiba Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Aiba Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinhua Coofixtools I And E Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinhua Coofixtools I And E Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Fung Hing Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Fung Hing Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hong Kong Willstrong Industrial Company Limited Supplier Evaluation
Hong Kong Willstrong Industrial Company Limited Supplier Evaluation
Hk Feitong International Limited Supplier Evaluation
Hk Feitong International Limited Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Damuyuan Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Damuyuan Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Kadeer Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Kadeer Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Huangxi Environmental Electrical Appliance Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Huangxi Environmental Electrical Appliance Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Yinwang New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Yinwang New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Yalan Yunhe Paper Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Yalan Yunhe Paper Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Jibenzhan Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Jibenzhan Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Funuote New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Funuote New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026