zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Shanghai Weijue Industry Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Supplier Evaluation Report: Shanghai Weijue Industry Co.,Ltd.

Shanghai Weijue Industry Co.,Ltd.

Executive Summary

Shanghai Weijue Industry Co.,Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Shanghai, with a reported factory area of 9,000+㎡ and 110+ staff. The company is marked as a verified supplier and operates on as a 2-year Gold Supplier with Trade Assurance support. Its listed product portfolio is focused on motorcycle helmet-related products, including open-face and half helmet listings, with low MOQ levels starting from 1–2 pieces. Business performance appears solid, with 300+ orders and CN¥1M+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.7 store rating and 100+ reviews. The supplier also shows operational strengths in on-time delivery at 93.5%, Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, and response time within 4 hours. Overall, this supplier is suitable for buyers seeking a mid-sized, verified, platform-backed supplier with stable transaction history and acceptable quality/service indicators. Further confirmation is recommended for detailed production capacity, audit scope, and product compliance documentation.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Company name: Shanghai Weijue Industry Co.,Ltd.
  • Location: Shanghai, China
  • Factory area: 9,000+㎡
  • Employees: 110+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Product listings include motorcycle helmet-related products.
  • Specific production line quantity, annual output, machinery list, and detailed audit report: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a reported factory scale of over 9,000㎡ and more than 110 employees, indicating a production base above small workshop level. This size suggests the company may be capable of handling regular commercial orders rather than only sample or micro-batch requests. The verified supplier status also strengthens the credibility of its basic company profile.

However, the available data does not include detailed production capacity, number of production lines, annual output, key equipment, R&D team size, warehouse capacity, or third-party factory audit details. Therefore, while the factory size and employee count support a mid-sized manufacturing profile, there is not enough evidence to classify the supplier as a large-scale or highly integrated supply chain operator.

Scoring Rationale

A 9,000+㎡ facility and 110+ employees represent a stable medium-sized factory foundation. The verified supplier status provides additional confidence. However, due to the absence of detailed capacity indicators and formal factory certification details, the score should not reach the top tier. The supplier fits best within the “medium stable factory” range.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 2 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Platform/industry tags:
  • Finished Product Inspection
  • Full Customization
  • On-time delivery 93.5%
  • Response time ≤4h
  • Specific third-party certification documents, audit body, and detailed compliance certificates: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has core platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. These elements improve buyer protection and indicate that the supplier has passed certain platform-level checks. The presence of Finished Product Inspection and Full Customization tags also suggests a more complete supplier profile compared with basic unverified sellers.

The Gold Supplier history is 2 years, which is positive but still relatively short compared with long-established platform suppliers. Additionally, although some product listings include wording such as “DOT Certified,” the provided data does not include independent certification documents or certificate numbers. Therefore, compliance credibility should be evaluated mainly from the platform data rather than unverified product compliance claims.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has the key platform protections and credibility markers expected from a reliable supplier: Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, and operational tags. However, the Gold Supplier tenure is only 2 years, and detailed certification documentation is not provided. This supports a solid but not top-level score.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 300+
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥1M+
  • Store rating: 4.7
  • Number of reviews: 100+

Elaboration

The supplier shows measurable commercial activity, with more than 300 orders and over CN¥1M in transaction value in the past six months. This indicates that the company has active buyer demand and has completed a meaningful number of transactions through the platform.

The 4.7 store rating is generally favorable, and 100+ reviews provide a reasonable customer feedback base. While the review count is not extremely high, it is sufficient to support a basic commercial validation. The combination of order volume, transaction value, and rating suggests that the supplier is not merely listed on the platform but has actual operating performance.

Scoring Rationale

The recent order count and transaction value are strong for a mid-sized supplier profile. The rating of 4.7 is positive, and 100+ reviews provide meaningful market feedback. However, the supplier does not show exceptionally large transaction figures or very high review volume, so the score is strong but not maximum.

Final Score

18 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Response time: ≤4h
  • Full Customization: True
  • Specific communication quality, multilingual support, design service scope, sample lead time, and after-sales process: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of within 4 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency for international procurement inquiries. The Full Customization tag is also a positive indicator, suggesting that the supplier may support customized buyer requirements.

However, the available data does not confirm the depth of customization, such as logo printing, structural design, packaging customization, mold development, or material-level customization. There is also no information on quotation speed, technical documentation support, or dedicated account management. Therefore, service capability can be considered solid at a basic-to-good level, but not fully validated as highly advanced.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier responds within 4 hours and supports Full Customization, which meets a good service capability level. Since the response time is not within 1 hour and customization details are not specified, the supplier should not receive a top-tier score.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 93.5%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time delivery rate of 93.5% is above the 90% benchmark, indicating strong delivery reliability based on the provided platform data. This is an important positive factor for buyers who require predictable replenishment, seasonal purchasing schedules, or time-sensitive shipments.

The data does not include average lead time, production cycle, shipping methods, export documentation speed, or delay reasons. Therefore, the assessment is based strictly on the provided on-time delivery rate.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. At 93.5%, the supplier demonstrates strong delivery performance, though not perfect. A score of 9 is appropriate.

Final Score

9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.7
  • Reviews: 100+
  • Finished Product Inspection: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Specific quality certifications, inspection standards, defect rate, return rate, and third-party test reports: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a 4.7 store rating supported by 100+ reviews, which indicates generally positive customer feedback. The Finished Product Inspection tag is also a meaningful quality-control indicator, suggesting that the supplier has at least some form of final inspection process before shipment.

The verified supplier status further improves confidence in the supplier’s authenticity and basic operational credibility. However, the data does not provide details on inspection procedures, AQL standards, internal QC team size, product testing reports, defect ratios, warranty policy, or formal quality management certifications. Therefore, the quality system appears credible at a platform level, but the depth of quality control cannot be fully verified from the current data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has good customer feedback, a reasonable review base, Finished Product Inspection, and verified supplier status. These factors support a strong quality score. However, the lack of detailed quality system documentation and third-party testing information prevents a top-tier rating.

Final Score

17 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 16 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 16 / 20
Business Performance 18 / 20
Service Capability 8 / 10
Delivery Performance 9 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 17 / 20
Total Score 84 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

Shanghai Weijue Industry Co.,Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking a verified, mid-sized Chinese supplier with active transaction performance, low MOQ options, acceptable service responsiveness, and strong delivery reliability. The supplier is particularly suitable for small-to-medium importers, trial-order buyers, online retailers, distributors, and purchasers who value platform protection through Trade Assurance.

Suitable customer types:
- Buyers requiring low MOQ trial orders
- Importers looking for a verified supplier
- Distributors seeking stable mid-volume supply
- E-commerce sellers needing flexible order quantities
- Buyers requiring customization support, subject to confirmation of customization scope

Main risks:
- Detailed production capacity is not provided.
- Specific factory audit report and audit scope are not provided.
- Product compliance documentation is not provided beyond product listing wording.
- Quality control details such as defect rate, AQL standard, test reports, and warranty process are Insufficient Data.
- Gold Supplier history is 2 years, which is positive but not long-term platform history.

Growth potential:
The supplier shows good commercial momentum with 300+ recent orders, CN¥1M+ transaction value, 4.7 rating, 100+ reviews, and 93.5% on-time delivery. If the company can provide stronger documentation on certifications, factory audits, product testing, and QC procedures, it could become a more competitive supplier for larger and more compliance-sensitive buyers.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Shanghai Rofee Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Rofee Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Senwo Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Senwo Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Fupower Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Fupower Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Chongfu Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Chongfu Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Hdmann Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Hdmann Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Hoho Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Hoho Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Galaxyfiber Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Galaxyfiber Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Suntung Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Suntung Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Qishen Plastic Industry Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Qishen Plastic Industry Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Qishen Plastic Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Qishen Plastic Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Hanwei Aluminum Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Hanwei Aluminum Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai M&G Stationery Inc. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai M&G Stationery Inc. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Pdyear Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Pdyear Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sinowell (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sinowell (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Langjue Mould Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Langjue Mould Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Kmcable Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Kmcable Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Yonghengsheng Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Yonghengsheng Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongyu Industrial (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongyu Industrial (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Xinding Coatings Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Xinding Coatings Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Zhulu Electronic Commerce Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Zhulu Electronic Commerce Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Shenzhen Abis Precision Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Abis Precision Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Lhm Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Lhm Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Nuoyu Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Nuoyu Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Huayingxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Huayingxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Tiger Head Battery Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Tiger Head Battery Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Xuang Mineral Products Processing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Xuang Mineral Products Processing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Rongsui Textile Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Rongsui Textile Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Baiyi New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Baiyi New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Kangjian Medical Apparatus Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Kangjian Medical Apparatus Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Fuyue Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Fuyue Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Donghai Runyang Jewelry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Donghai Runyang Jewelry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Semlamp Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Semlamp Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Tiptop New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Tiptop New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Heshan Linghuang Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Heshan Linghuang Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Fuwei Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Fuwei Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nuoxin New Materials (Shandong) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nuoxin New Materials (Shandong) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Jianghe Magnetic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Jianghe Magnetic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yuyao Licheng Tools, Co, Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Yuyao Licheng Tools, Co, Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Gongtu New Energy Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Gongtu New Energy Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Qianfeng Capart Int'L Corp. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Qianfeng Capart Int'L Corp. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026