zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Shanghai Hoho Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Shanghai Hoho Industry Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Shanghai, with a reported factory area of 9,600+ m² and 130+ staff. The company shows a relatively solid operational foundation, supported by verified supplier status, 12 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, and strong recent transaction activity. Its platform data indicates 800+ orders and CN¥67.6M+ transaction value over the past six months, reflecting strong commercial validation. The supplier also demonstrates excellent delivery reliability with a 100.0% on-time delivery rate. Product listings show low minimum order quantities, which may suit both trial procurement and flexible purchasing. However, available data does not confirm Full Customization capability, Finished Product Inspection, or detailed third-party factory audit documentation beyond verified supplier status. Overall, this supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking a commercially proven, delivery-stable supplier with strong platform credibility, while quality assurance details should be further verified before large-scale procurement.

Detailed Analysis

  1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Shanghai, China
- Factory area: 9,600+ m²
- Employees: 130+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
Shanghai Hoho Industry Co., Ltd. has a documented physical production base with a factory area exceeding 9,600 m² and a workforce of more than 130 employees. This indicates a meaningful production setup rather than a purely trading-oriented profile. The verified supplier status further supports the credibility of its operational presence. However, the provided data does not include detailed production line numbers, annual production capacity, machinery information, or specific factory audit reports.

Scoring Rationale
The company appears to be a medium-scale and stable supplier based on factory size and employee count. The scale is stronger than a small workshop and suggests capacity for consistent order fulfillment. However, it does not reach the highest score range because the data does not prove a large-scale supply chain structure, advanced manufacturing capacity, or comprehensive factory certification beyond verified supplier status.

Final Score
17 / 20

  1. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 12 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry tags: “Response time ≤4h”, “On-time delivery 100.0%”
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has maintained Gold Supplier status for 12 years, which is a strong indicator of long-term platform presence. Trade Assurance availability adds transaction protection for buyers. The supplier also has verified supplier status, supporting basic platform credibility. The listed platform tags confirm response and delivery performance indicators, although no additional compliance certifications, product certifications, or industry-specific quality certificates are provided in the data.

Scoring Rationale
A 12-year Gold Supplier record, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status create a strong credibility profile. The supplier qualifies for the high-score range due to long-term platform continuity and transaction protection mechanisms. The score is not a full 20 because the provided certification tag information is limited and does not include broader compliance documentation or detailed certification records.

Final Score
19 / 20

  1. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past six months: 800+
- Transaction value in past six months: CN¥67.6M+
- Store rating: 4.8
- Reviews: 50+

Elaboration
The supplier shows strong recent business activity, with over 800 orders and more than CN¥67.6M in transaction value within six months. This reflects strong buyer engagement and a relatively high level of commercial validation on the platform. The store rating of 4.8 is positive, while the review count of 50+ provides some customer feedback base, though it is not extremely large relative to the transaction volume.

Scoring Rationale
The combination of high order volume and high transaction value supports a strong business performance score. The 4.8 rating further indicates generally positive buyer satisfaction. The score is slightly below full marks because the review volume is moderate rather than extensive, and the data does not provide repeat buyer rate, dispute rate, or category-specific sales performance.

Final Score
18 / 20

  1. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤4h
- Platform tag: “Response time ≤4h”
- Full Customization capability: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier’s response time is documented as within four hours, which indicates acceptable communication efficiency for online procurement. However, the data does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization, private label services, OEM/ODM development, packaging customization, or engineering support. Therefore, service capability can only be assessed based on response speed, not full-service flexibility.

Scoring Rationale
A response time of ≤4h is commercially acceptable but does not meet the strongest benchmark of ≤1 hour. Since there is no evidence of Full Customization capability, the supplier cannot be scored in the highest range for service capability. The score reflects adequate responsiveness but incomplete evidence of advanced service support.

Final Score
7 / 10

  1. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%
- Platform tag: “On-time delivery 100.0%”

Elaboration
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is the strongest delivery indicator provided in the dataset. This suggests reliable fulfillment performance for completed platform orders. However, the data does not include average lead time, logistics methods, production cycle, or performance under peak-season order pressure.

Scoring Rationale
Based on the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. A reported 100.0% rate supports the maximum score. The rating is based strictly on the provided platform delivery data.

Final Score
10 / 10

  1. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.8
- Reviews: 50+
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Insufficient Data beyond verified supplier status

Elaboration
The supplier has a positive store rating of 4.8 and more than 50 reviews, indicating generally favorable customer feedback. Verified supplier status provides some credibility regarding supplier identity or platform verification. However, the data does not confirm Finished Product Inspection, detailed factory verification, product testing reports, quality certifications, defect rates, return rates, or inspection procedures.

Scoring Rationale
The 4.8 rating supports a good quality perception, and the review base offers some buyer feedback. However, the absence of explicit Finished Product Inspection data and detailed factory verification information limits the quality assurance score. The supplier appears to have acceptable customer feedback but lacks enough documented quality control evidence to qualify for the top range.

Final Score
15 / 20

Total Score

86 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with verification controls.

Shanghai Hoho Industry Co., Ltd. appears to be a strong candidate for buyers seeking a platform-validated supplier with stable transaction performance, reliable delivery, and medium-scale production capacity. The supplier is especially suitable for customers prioritizing commercial reliability, low-MOQ trial orders, and suppliers with long-term presence.

Applicable customer types include: - Buyers requiring a supplier with strong recent transaction performance. - Importers seeking low-MOQ procurement flexibility. - Customers prioritizing on-time delivery and Trade Assurance protection. - Buyers comfortable conducting additional quality verification before scaling orders.

Main risk points: - Insufficient Data on Full Customization capability. - Insufficient Data on Finished Product Inspection. - Insufficient Data on detailed factory audit or factory verification documents beyond verified supplier status. - Review count is positive but not extensive relative to the reported transaction volume.

Growth potential: The supplier shows strong growth potential due to high recent transaction value, 800+ six-month order volume, 12-year Gold Supplier history, and 100.0% on-time delivery performance. If it can provide clearer quality inspection records, customization capability, and factory audit documentation, its suitability for larger and more demanding procurement programs would be further strengthened.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Shanghai Rofee Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Rofee Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Senwo Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Senwo Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Weijue Industry Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Weijue Industry Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Fupower Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Fupower Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Chongfu Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Chongfu Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Hdmann Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Hdmann Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Galaxyfiber Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Galaxyfiber Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Suntung Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Suntung Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Qishen Plastic Industry Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Qishen Plastic Industry Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Qishen Plastic Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Qishen Plastic Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Hanwei Aluminum Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Hanwei Aluminum Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai M&G Stationery Inc. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai M&G Stationery Inc. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Pdyear Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Pdyear Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sinowell (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sinowell (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Langjue Mould Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Langjue Mould Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Kmcable Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Kmcable Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Yonghengsheng Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Yonghengsheng Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongyu Industrial (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongyu Industrial (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Xinding Coatings Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Xinding Coatings Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changxing County Qizhimeng Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changxing County Qizhimeng Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Zhengzhou Kerui Industrial Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Kerui Industrial Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Yuntai Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Yuntai Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou J&H Storefixture Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou J&H Storefixture Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Langtong Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Langtong Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Stitch Textile Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Stitch Textile Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Tongda Jiean Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Tongda Jiean Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Surely Metal Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Surely Metal Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Jinjie Network Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Jinjie Network Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Botai Photoelectric Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Botai Photoelectric Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Huixin Diamond Tools Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Huixin Diamond Tools Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Hiitio New Energy Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Hiitio New Energy Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yilian Photoelectric Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yilian Photoelectric Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xinrong Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xinrong Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhangjiagang Rely Auto Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Zhangjiagang Rely Auto Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Cixi Hoto Metallic Product Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cixi Hoto Metallic Product Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chengdu Jingdianmei Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chengdu Jingdianmei Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Zehong Plastic Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Zehong Plastic Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Huayuan Metal Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Huayuan Metal Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hesheng Magnetics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hesheng Magnetics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Nanhai Yanbu Yongbo Hardware Factory Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Nanhai Yanbu Yongbo Hardware Factory Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026