Anhui Haihua Chemical Technology Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Anhui Haihua Chemical Technology Group Co., Ltd. is a China-based chemical supplier located in Anhui, with a reported factory area of over 370,000㎡ and more than 670 staff. Based on the provided data, the company demonstrates strong physical production capacity and is marked as a verified supplier, indicating a relatively solid manufacturing foundation. Its listed products are mainly BHT-related chemical products, including synthetic, feed grade, and industrial grade antioxidant applications.

From a procurement perspective, the supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking factory-scale chemical sourcing with Trade Assurance and platform-backed transaction protection. However, its Gold Supplier history is short at 1 year, and its commercial track record is limited, with only 4 orders and CN¥676.1+ transaction value over the past six months. Customer feedback data is weak, with no store rating and 0 reviews. Overall, this supplier shows strong production potential but limited market validation on the platform.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

• Factory area: 370,000+㎡
• Employees: 670+ staff
• Verified supplier: True
• Factory location: Anhui, China

Elaboration

The supplier reports a large-scale factory footprint and a workforce exceeding 670 employees, which indicates a substantial operational base. The verified supplier status further supports the credibility of its basic manufacturing presence. Compared with smaller trading-oriented suppliers, the available data suggests stronger underlying production infrastructure.

Scoring Rationale

The company meets the characteristics of a large-scale supplier due to its reported factory size, employee count, and verified supplier status. However, the data does not provide detailed production capacity, annual output, equipment information, or specific factory audit documents, so the score should not reach the maximum.

Final Score

19 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier years: 1 yr
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier: True
• Certification / industry tags: OEM for well-known brands, Finished product inspection, Response time ≤7h, On-time delivery 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier has several useful platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. These factors provide a basic level of buyer protection and platform-backed credibility. The presence of platform tags also strengthens its profile, although the Gold Supplier duration is still short.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has the core platform credibility elements expected from a serious supplier, but the 1-year Gold Supplier history limits long-term reliability validation. Some tags are operational or service-related rather than formal third-party compliance certifications. Therefore, the supplier is credible but not yet strongly proven over time.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

• Orders in past 6 months: 4
• Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥676.1+
• Store rating: Insufficient Data
• Reviews: 0

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded some transaction activity, but the scale is very limited. Four orders and CN¥676.1+ in transaction value over six months do not demonstrate strong marketplace traction. The absence of store rating and customer reviews further reduces the strength of commercial validation.

Scoring Rationale

Although there is evidence of platform transactions, the order count and transaction amount are low. The lack of rating and reviews makes it difficult to confirm buyer satisfaction or repeat purchasing behavior. This places the supplier below the level of a stable medium-volume performer.

Final Score

8 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤7h
• Full Customization: Insufficient Data
• Related tag: OEM for well-known brands

Elaboration

The reported response time of ≤7 hours suggests the supplier has an acceptable communication mechanism, though it is not within the strongest ≤1 hour service tier. The OEM-related tag indicates some possible service flexibility, but the provided data does not confirm Full Customization capability.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates basic service responsiveness, but the response time is not fast enough for a top score. Since Full Customization is not explicitly confirmed, service capability should be evaluated conservatively. The OEM tag is useful but cannot be treated as full customization evidence.

Final Score

6 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is a strong delivery performance indicator. Based on the scoring rule, any rate above 90% qualifies for the highest delivery performance range.

Scoring Rationale

The delivery data directly supports a high score. However, because the total recent order volume is only 4 orders, the delivery record is positive but based on a limited transaction sample.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

• Finished product inspection: Listed
• Verified supplier / Factory verification: True
• Store rating: Insufficient Data
• Reviews: 0

Elaboration

The supplier has positive quality-related indicators, including Finished Product Inspection and verified supplier status. These suggest that some quality control or verification mechanisms are present. However, customer-side feedback is absent, with no reviews and no available store rating.

Scoring Rationale

The quality assurance indicators support a moderate score, but the absence of customer reviews and store rating prevents stronger validation of product consistency or buyer satisfaction. The supplier has basic quality safeguards, but market feedback is insufficient.

Final Score

12 / 20

Total Score

71 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended for buyers seeking large-scale BHT-related chemical sourcing from a verified Chinese supplier with Trade Assurance support. The supplier is more suitable for buyers who can conduct their own sample testing, specification confirmation, and quality inspection before bulk purchasing.

Key risks include limited platform transaction history, very low recent transaction value, no store rating, and 0 customer reviews. These factors reduce confidence in commercial maturity and customer-validated quality performance. Growth potential is present due to the supplier’s large factory scale, verified status, Trade Assurance availability, and 100.0% reported on-time delivery rate, but procurement should proceed with controlled trial orders and strict quality verification.