Anhui Senang Green Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Anhui Senang Green Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Anhui, focused on disposable paper food packaging products such as food trays, round containers, rectangular paper containers, and ready-to-ship disposable items. Based on the provided data, the company operates with a factory area of over 3,000㎡ and more than 30 staff, indicating a relatively small to lower-mid-sized manufacturing setup with basic production capability. Its platform credibility is strong, supported by 7 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, supplier verification, finished product inspection, and a 99.1% on-time delivery label. Business performance is solid, with over 200 orders and CN¥6.4M+ transaction value in the past six months, although the review count remains limited at 10+. This supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking paper food packaging with low to medium MOQ options, fast communication, and reliable delivery. For large-scale strategic sourcing, further validation of production capacity, quality systems, and customization depth is recommended.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

• Factory location: Anhui, China
• Factory area: 3,000+㎡
• Employees: 30+ staff
• Verified supplier / factory audit status: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a physical factory base with more than 3,000㎡ of production space and over 30 employees. This indicates an established operating entity rather than a purely trading-oriented profile. However, the available scale indicators suggest a small to lower-mid-sized factory rather than a large industrial manufacturing base. The presence of supplier verification improves credibility, but there is insufficient data on production lines, monthly output, machinery, warehouse capacity, or factory certifications.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates basic manufacturing stability through its factory area, staff size, and verified supplier status. However, the workforce and factory size do not support classification as a large-scale supply chain operation. The score reflects a supplier with credible but limited visible production capacity.

Final Score

13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 7 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verification status: True
• Certification / platform labels: Low MOQ for customization, Finished product inspection, On-time delivery 99.1%

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong platform credibility profile. Seven years as a Gold Supplier indicates a relatively long operating history on . Trade Assurance provides transaction protection, while the verification status and platform labels add further credibility. Finished product inspection and on-time delivery labels are positive compliance-related indicators. However, no independent international certifications such as ISO, BRC, FSC, FDA, or food-contact compliance certificates were provided, so these cannot be assumed.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier meets most platform-based trust requirements: long Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance, verification, and operational performance tags. The only limitation is the absence of detailed third-party certification data beyond platform labels.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

• Past 6-month orders: 200+
• Past 6-month transaction value: CN¥6.4M+
• Store rating: 4.8
• Review count: 10+

Elaboration

The supplier shows meaningful transaction activity over the past six months, with more than 200 orders and CN¥6.4M+ in transaction value. This indicates active market demand and proven commercial engagement on the platform. The store rating of 4.8 is strong, but the review base of 10+ is relatively limited, which reduces the depth of customer feedback validation.

Scoring Rationale

Order volume and transaction value are both strong for platform-based sourcing evaluation. The rating is positive, but the small number of reviews prevents the supplier from receiving a top-tier score, as customer feedback coverage is not yet broad enough to fully validate consistency across many buyers.

Final Score

17 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤1h
• Full Customization: Insufficient Data
• Customization-related label: Low MOQ for customization

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates fast response capability, with communication response time within one hour. This is a strong indicator for sourcing efficiency, especially during inquiry, sampling, price negotiation, and order confirmation stages. The platform label suggests some customization flexibility through low MOQ customization, but the data does not confirm full customization capability, design support, OEM/ODM scope, packaging customization, or sample development process.

Scoring Rationale

Fast response time supports a strong service score. However, because Full Customization is not explicitly provided and only a general low-MOQ customization label is available, the supplier cannot be rated at the highest service level.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 99.1%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is very strong at 99.1%, exceeding the 90% benchmark for top-tier delivery performance. This suggests reliable order fulfillment behavior within the platform’s recorded delivery data.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, any on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. At 99.1%, the supplier demonstrates excellent delivery reliability based on the provided data.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

• Store rating: 4.8
• Review count: 10+
• Finished product inspection: Present
• Factory / supplier verification: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a positive store rating of 4.8, supported by finished product inspection and verification status. These are favorable quality assurance indicators. However, the review count is only 10+, which limits the statistical strength of customer feedback. There is also insufficient data on defect rates, inspection standards, quality certifications, material compliance, food-contact testing, or third-party audit reports.

Scoring Rationale

The quality profile is solid because of the high rating, finished product inspection label, and verification status. However, the limited number of reviews and lack of detailed certification or inspection documentation prevent a top-tier quality score.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

83 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with standard due diligence. Anhui Senang Green Technology Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking disposable paper food packaging products with active platform transaction records, fast response, low-to-medium MOQ options, and strong delivery reliability.

The main risks are limited visible factory scale, low review count, and insufficient data on full customization capability, production capacity, and formal product compliance certifications. Buyers placing larger or regulated food-packaging orders should request samples, inspection reports, material compliance documents, and clearer production capacity data before bulk purchasing.

Overall, the supplier shows good growth potential due to strong platform credibility, solid recent transaction performance, and excellent on-time delivery.