Guangzhou Gracer Renewable Resources Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Guangzhou Gracer Renewable Resources Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Guangdong, positioned in the used and second-hand clothing segment, including mixed branded apparel, thrift clothing bales, trousers, ladies’ summer clothing, and used jackets. Based on the provided data, the company shows relatively strong operational capacity, with a factory area of over 23,000㎡, more than 200 staff, and verified supplier status. Its platform credibility is solid, supported by 7 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, finished product inspection, and an on-time delivery rate of 96.2%. Commercial performance is also meaningful, with 100+ orders and CN¥13.5M+ transaction value over the past six months. However, customer review volume is moderate at 30+, and the available service data only confirms a response time of ≤4 hours, with no clear evidence of Full Customization capability. Overall, this supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking bulk second-hand clothing supply with low MOQ and reliable delivery performance.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Final Score: 18 / 20

Basis

• Company: Guangzhou Gracer Renewable Resources Co., Ltd.
• Location: Guangdong, China
• Factory area: 23,000+㎡
• Employees: 200+ staff
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates a relatively strong physical and organizational base. A factory area exceeding 23,000㎡ indicates a sizable operating facility, especially relevant for second-hand apparel sorting, storage, grading, and bulk handling. The presence of more than 200 staff also suggests the company has a meaningful labor structure to support sourcing, processing, packing, and order fulfillment activities.

The supplier is also marked as a verified supplier, which adds credibility to the stated factory and company information. While the data does not provide specific production line numbers, monthly output, warehouse capacity, or audit details, the combination of factory size, staff count, and verified status supports the view that the company has more than basic production and supply capability.

Scoring Rationale

A score of 18 is justified because the supplier shows large-scale operational indicators: 23,000+㎡ facility size and 200+ staff. These are stronger than typical small-scale trading operations and suggest stable handling capacity for bulk used clothing orders. However, the score is not higher because the provided data does not include detailed factory audit reports, production capacity figures, equipment lists, or specific factory certification documents beyond verified supplier status.

Final Score

18 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Final Score: 19 / 20

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 7 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier: True
• Certification / industry tags:
• Low MOQ for customization
• Finished product inspection
• On-time delivery 96.2%

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong platform credibility profile. A 7-year Gold Supplier history indicates a relatively long-standing presence on , which is an important trust signal for international buyers. Trade Assurance availability further improves transaction security, giving buyers a structured platform mechanism for order protection.

The supplier also carries several useful platform tags, including finished product inspection and low MOQ for customization. These tags suggest that the supplier has at least some level of inspection and customization-related service recognition on the platform. The inclusion of an on-time delivery rate also increases transparency around fulfillment performance.

Scoring Rationale

The score of 19 reflects a highly credible platform profile. The supplier has the key credibility elements expected from a lower-risk supplier: long Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, and relevant inspection/delivery tags. The reason it is not scored at a perfect 20 is that the provided data does not include detailed third-party certification names, audit scope, compliance certificates, or formal factory audit documentation beyond platform-level verification.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Final Score: 17 / 20

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: 100+
• Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥13.5M+
• Store rating: 4.6
• Reviews: 30+

Elaboration

The supplier shows strong recent commercial activity. More than 100 orders in the past six months indicates active buyer engagement, while CN¥13.5M+ in transaction value suggests that the supplier has handled meaningful order volume. This is particularly relevant for bulk second-hand clothing categories, where transaction value and repeat purchasing behavior can indicate operational reliability.

The store rating of 4.6 is positive, though not at the highest possible level. The review count of 30+ provides some customer feedback base, but it is not a large review pool relative to the reported transaction scale. Therefore, while business performance appears stable and commercially validated, the review volume is still moderate.

Scoring Rationale

A score of 17 is appropriate because the supplier has strong transaction value and a healthy order count over the past six months. CN¥13.5M+ is a notable commercial indicator and supports the supplier’s market activity. However, the score is kept below the 18–20 range because the store rating is good but not exceptional, and the review count of 30+ is not high enough to represent broad customer validation.

Final Score

17 / 20

4. Service Capability

Final Score: 7 / 10

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤4 hours
• Customization-related tag: Low MOQ for customization
• Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of within 4 hours indicates a reasonable communication standard. This is acceptable for international sourcing, especially when buyers need quotations, product details, and order coordination. The platform tag “Low MOQ for customization” suggests the supplier may support some customization-related services at relatively accessible order quantities.

However, the data does not confirm Full Customization capability. There is no information regarding logo customization, packaging customization, grading customization, bale composition customization, labeling, private-label support, or design-based customization. Therefore, the supplier’s service capability can be considered functional, but not fully proven as advanced or highly customized.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier receives 7 out of 10 because its response time is acceptable and there is some evidence of customization-related support through the “Low MOQ for customization” tag. However, the response time is not within the strongest category of ≤1 hour, and there is insufficient data to confirm Full Customization capability. This places the supplier in the normal-to-good service range rather than the top tier.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Final Score: 10 / 10

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 96.2%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is 96.2%, which is a strong indicator of fulfillment reliability. For bulk used clothing shipments, delivery consistency is important because buyers often depend on predictable shipment timing for resale, warehousing, and inventory turnover.

A rate above 90% meets the highest scoring band under the required evaluation criteria. The provided data does not include lead time, shipping methods, historical delay causes, or dispute records, but the on-time delivery percentage itself is strong.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier qualifies for the highest delivery performance score because its on-time delivery rate is above 90%. At 96.2%, the supplier demonstrates strong delivery discipline based on the available platform data. No deductions are applied under this dimension because the scoring rule directly places suppliers above 90% in the 9–10 range, and 96.2% supports a full score.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Final Score: 17 / 20

Basis

• Store rating: 4.6
• Reviews: 30+
• Finished product inspection: Present in platform tags
• Verified supplier: True
• Factory Verification: Supplier verification is marked True, but detailed factory verification scope is not provided

Elaboration

The supplier has several positive quality-related indicators. A 4.6 store rating suggests generally favorable buyer satisfaction. The presence of “Finished product inspection” is also important, especially in the second-hand clothing category, where grading, condition control, sorting accuracy, and consistency are critical to buyer satisfaction.

The verified supplier status further supports basic trust in company identity and operating legitimacy. However, the review count of 30+ is moderate rather than extensive. Also, while the supplier is marked as verified, the provided data does not include detailed inspection standards, defect rates, sorting grades, quality control workflow, or third-party factory audit documentation.

Scoring Rationale

A score of 17 is appropriate because the supplier has a good rating, verified status, and a finished product inspection tag. These factors indicate a reasonable quality assurance framework. The score is not placed in the 18–20 range because the review quantity is not large, and there is insufficient data on detailed quality control procedures, inspection criteria, or factory verification scope.

Final Score

17 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for cooperation, especially for bulk used clothing procurement.

Guangzhou Gracer Renewable Resources Co., Ltd. appears to be a strong candidate for buyers sourcing second-hand clothing, thrift clothing bales, mixed branded apparel, used jackets, trousers, and ladies’ clothing in kilogram-based bulk orders. The supplier is particularly suitable for importers, wholesalers, thrift retailers, resale businesses, and buyers requiring relatively low MOQ orders starting from 45 kilograms, based on the listed product MOQ.

Key strengths include a sizable factory area, 200+ staff, 7-year Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, CN¥13.5M+ transaction value in the past six months, and a strong 96.2% on-time delivery rate.

Main risks include moderate review volume, lack of detailed quality control documentation, and insufficient data on Full Customization capability. Buyers should request sample bales, detailed grading standards, inspection photos or videos, packing specifications, and written quality criteria before placing larger orders.

Growth potential appears positive based on strong transaction value, stable platform credibility, and reliable delivery performance.