Anhui Angran Green Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Anhui Angran Green Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Anhui, with a reported factory area of 1,100+㎡ and 20+ staff. Based on the provided data, the company appears to be a small-scale but operationally established supplier, supported by platform credibility including 9 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status. Its product listings focus on stair nosing / self-luminous emery-related products with relatively low MOQs of 50–100 meters, which may suit small to mid-sized procurement needs.

Commercial performance is relatively solid, with 100+ orders and CN¥540.9K+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.7 store rating and 20+ reviews. Delivery performance is strong at 95.2% on-time shipment. The main limitations are the modest factory scale, limited employee base, and relatively small review volume. Overall, this supplier is suitable for buyers seeking verified platform suppliers with moderate order capacity, customization support, and reliable delivery performance.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Anhui, China
- Factory area: 1,100+㎡
- Employees: 20+ staff
- Verified supplier / factory audit status: True
- Factory certification details: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The company has a defined physical factory presence with 1,100+㎡ of factory area and more than 20 employees. This indicates basic in-house operational capability rather than a purely trading-oriented profile. However, the factory scale and staffing level are relatively limited compared with larger industrial suppliers. The presence of verified supplier status improves confidence in the company’s legitimacy, but no detailed factory certification, production line capacity, annual output, or equipment information is provided.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates basic manufacturing strength and verified factory credibility, but its factory area and employee count place it closer to a small-scale production operation. The available data supports that it can handle regular production, but does not prove large-volume or complex supply chain capability. Because verification exists but scale indicators remain modest, the score falls within the “small but with basic production capability” range.

Final Score
12 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 9 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier / factory audit status: True
- Certification / industry tags: Project solutions, Finished product inspection, Full customization, Minor customization

Elaboration
The supplier has a strong platform profile, with 9 years of Gold Supplier history and Trade Assurance support. This provides a meaningful level of platform-based transaction credibility. Verified supplier status further strengthens trustworthiness, while listed service and quality-related tags such as Finished product inspection and customization capabilities indicate a more complete platform profile.

Scoring Rationale
A 9-year Gold Supplier record is a strong indicator of platform continuity. Trade Assurance and verified supplier status reduce procurement risk compared with suppliers lacking such backing. The available certification and capability tags are also relatively complete. Since the provided data does not include independent third-party certificates beyond platform tags, the score is strong but not treated as perfect.

Final Score
19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 100+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥540.9K+
- Store rating: 4.7
- Reviews: 20+

Elaboration
The supplier shows active recent transaction performance, with more than 100 orders in the past six months. The transaction value of CN¥540.9K+ suggests meaningful commercial activity, though not necessarily large-scale industrial volume. A 4.7 store rating is positive, while the review count of 20+ provides some customer validation but remains relatively limited in sample size.

Scoring Rationale
The combination of 100+ recent orders and CN¥540.9K+ transaction value indicates stable commercial activity. The 4.7 rating supports buyer satisfaction, but the limited number of reviews prevents the supplier from being classified as a high-volume, highly validated seller. Therefore, the supplier fits the upper range of stable medium-scale business performance rather than the top tier.

Final Score
16 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤2h
- Full customization: Listed
- Minor customization: Listed
- Project solutions: Listed

Elaboration
The supplier provides a response time of within two hours, which is acceptable for international procurement communication. The presence of Full customization and Minor customization tags suggests it can support buyer-specific requirements to some extent. Project solutions also indicate service support beyond simple product listing, although detailed engineering, design, or after-sales service information is not provided.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier does not meet the strongest service benchmark of response time within one hour, but a ≤2h response time remains commercially practical. Customization tags improve the score, particularly Full customization, which is valuable for project or specification-based sourcing. Because detailed customization cases or technical service documentation are not provided, the score remains in the good but not excellent range.

Final Score
8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time shipment rate: 95.2%

Elaboration
The supplier’s reported on-time shipment rate is 95.2%, which is above the 90% threshold for strong delivery performance. This suggests reliable order fulfillment and better-than-average logistics execution based on the available platform data.

Scoring Rationale
A 95.2% on-time shipment rate clearly falls into the highest scoring band for delivery performance. However, no additional data is provided regarding average lead time, export shipping history, delayed order causes, or performance across different order sizes. Therefore, the supplier receives a high score, while a small margin is retained due to limited supporting delivery details.

Final Score
9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.7
- Reviews: 20+
- Finished product inspection: Listed
- Verified supplier / factory audit status: True
- Detailed product defect rate or third-party quality certificates: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has a positive store rating of 4.7, which indicates generally favorable customer feedback. The Finished product inspection tag is an important quality-related indicator, suggesting that some form of final inspection process is available. Verified supplier status adds further credibility. However, the review base is only 20+, which limits the statistical strength of customer feedback. No specific defect rate, inspection standard, test report, or independent quality certification is provided.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates a reasonable quality foundation through its rating, inspection tag, and verified status. However, the limited number of reviews and absence of detailed quality documentation prevent it from reaching the highest scoring range. The quality profile is suitable for standard procurement evaluation but should be further validated before large or specification-sensitive orders.

Final Score
16 / 20

Total Score

Total Score: 80 / 100

Score breakdown:

• Company Strength: 12 / 20
• Platform & Compliance Credibility: 19 / 20
• Business Performance: 16 / 20
• Service Capability: 8 / 10
• Delivery Performance: 9 / 10
• Quality & Customer Feedback: 16 / 20

Procurement Recommendation

Anhui Angran Green Technology Co., Ltd. is recommended for conditional cooperation, especially for small to mid-sized buyers, project-based procurement, or customers seeking stair nosing / self-luminous emery-related products with relatively low MOQ requirements.

The supplier’s main strengths are its 9-year Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier profile, strong on-time shipment rate, and active recent transaction record. These factors make it a credible candidate for trial orders and recurring moderate-volume purchases.

Key risks include limited factory scale, modest employee count, limited review volume, and insufficient data on detailed factory certifications, production capacity, defect rates, and third-party quality certificates. For larger-volume or technically demanding procurement, buyers should request samples, confirm specifications, review inspection standards, and clarify production lead times before placing bulk orders.

Overall, the supplier shows good platform credibility and reliable delivery performance, with growth potential if it can provide stronger quality documentation, broader customer feedback, and clearer production capacity data.