zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Foshan Green Protect Decoration Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Foshan Green Protect Decoration Material Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Guangdong, with a reported factory area of 2,700+ sqm and 50+ staff. The company appears to focus on floor protection and construction decoration-related products, with listed offerings including heavy-duty floor protector products, tile floor protection solutions, waterproof anti-slip products, and OEM/ODM-related options. Its platform profile shows Gold Supplier status for 1 year, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, Finished Product Inspection, ODM service, Full Customization, and Minor Customization. Commercial traction is present but still limited, with 10 orders and CN¥540.9K+ transaction value over the past six months. However, customer feedback data is weak, with no store rating provided and 0 reviews. The supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking responsive communication, customization capability, and moderate-volume sourcing, but risk control is needed around delivery consistency and limited public customer feedback.

Detailed Analysis

Foshan Green Protect Decoration  Material Technology Co., Ltd.

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Guangdong, China
- Factory area: 2,700+ sqm
- Employees: 50+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a defined physical factory scale with more than 2,700 sqm of reported operating area and over 50 staff members. This indicates a basic manufacturing organization rather than a purely trading-oriented profile. The verified supplier status adds credibility to the existence and operational structure of the company. However, the available data does not indicate large-scale production capacity, multiple production lines, annual output, major equipment, or internationally recognized factory certifications.

Scoring Rationale
The company demonstrates basic-to-moderate production capability supported by factory area, staff count, and supplier verification. However, compared with larger-scale manufacturers, the reported factory size and workforce remain relatively modest. Since there is no additional data on production capacity, machinery, output volume, or advanced factory certifications, the company should not be classified as a large-scale stable supply chain provider.

Final Score
13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 1 year
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification / platform tags: Finished Product Inspection, ODM service available, Full Customization, Minor Customization

Elaboration
The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status. The presence of Finished Product Inspection and customization-related tags further strengthens its platform profile. However, the Gold Supplier history is only 1 year, which limits the evidence of long-term platform reliability.

Scoring Rationale
Core platform credibility elements are present, including Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, verification, and inspection/customization tags. This supports a relatively credible sourcing profile. The main limitation is the short Gold Supplier duration, which means the company has not yet built a long track record on the platform. Therefore, the score fits the “core certifications complete but shorter platform history” range.

Final Score
16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in the past 6 months: 10
- Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥540.9K+
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Number of reviews: 0

Elaboration
The supplier has recorded 10 orders over the past six months, indicating some commercial activity. The transaction amount of CN¥540.9K+ suggests that at least part of the order value may be meaningful in scale. However, the order count is not high, and the absence of store rating and customer reviews limits the ability to validate buyer satisfaction or repeat purchasing behavior.

Scoring Rationale
The transaction value provides some positive commercial validation, but the order quantity remains relatively limited. More importantly, the lack of store rating and 0 reviews significantly weakens the transparency of business performance. The supplier shows early or moderate transaction activity, but not enough evidence to classify it as a highly validated high-volume supplier.

Final Score
11 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Response time: ≤1h
- Full Customization: Available
- Minor Customization: Available
- ODM service: Available

Elaboration
The supplier shows strong service responsiveness with a response time of less than or equal to one hour. It also supports Full Customization, Minor Customization, and ODM service, which indicates flexibility for buyers requiring product adaptation or customized sourcing solutions.

Scoring Rationale
The combination of fast response time and multiple customization capabilities supports a strong service profile. Based on the available data, the supplier meets the highest service-capability benchmark: response within one hour and strong customization support. No negative service indicators are provided.

Final Score
10 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 71.4%

Elaboration
The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is 71.4%, which falls within the 70%–79% range. This indicates that delivery reliability exists but is not strong. For buyers with strict project timelines or time-sensitive procurement needs, this delivery performance should be treated as a key operational risk.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring framework, an on-time delivery rate between 70% and 79% corresponds to 5–6 points. Since 71.4% is close to the lower end of this range, the score is set conservatively. The supplier may be workable for non-urgent or planned purchasing, but buyers should confirm lead times and shipment schedules before placing larger orders.

Final Score
5 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Number of reviews: 0
- Finished Product Inspection: Available
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has some quality assurance indicators, including Finished Product Inspection and verified supplier status. These are positive signals for basic quality control and platform-level verification. However, there is no available store rating and no customer reviews, which makes it difficult to assess real buyer satisfaction, product consistency, or after-sales experience.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has basic quality assurance support, but customer feedback evidence is insufficient. Finished Product Inspection improves the quality profile, but the absence of ratings and reviews prevents a higher score. The company should be viewed as having a basic quality framework, while actual product performance still needs to be validated through samples, inspection, and trial orders.

Final Score
12 / 20

Total Score

67 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended for buyers seeking floor protection or construction decoration-related products with customization requirements and fast supplier communication. The supplier is more suitable for small to medium-sized buyers, trial orders, project-based procurement, or buyers that can conduct sample validation before scaling order volume.

The main strengths are verified supplier status, Trade Assurance support, fast response time, Full Customization, ODM service availability, and Finished Product Inspection. The key risks are the limited Gold Supplier history, only 10 orders in the past six months, no available store rating, 0 reviews, and a relatively weak on-time delivery rate of 71.4%.

For procurement execution, buyers should start with sample testing or a controlled trial order, confirm production lead time in writing, use Trade Assurance where possible, and consider pre-shipment inspection. Growth potential exists if the supplier improves delivery reliability and accumulates more verified customer feedback.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Foshan Uogele Decoration Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Uogele Decoration Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Nanhai Ruida Metal Decoration Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Nanhai Ruida Metal Decoration Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Nanhai Hualun Guanse Decoration Material Factory Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Nanhai Hualun Guanse Decoration Material Factory Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shengyao Decoration Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shengyao Decoration Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Enze Decoration Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Enze Decoration Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huangshan Runyi Decoration Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huangshan Runyi Decoration Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Jixiang Decoration And Building Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Jixiang Decoration And Building Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Beauty East Decoration Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Beauty East Decoration Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Yijin New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Yijin New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Debogang New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Debogang New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Zhongxingcheng New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Zhongxingcheng New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Senang Green Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Senang Green Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Angran Green Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Angran Green Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Oriental Green Source Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Oriental Green Source Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Vital Green Health Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Vital Green Health Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Lizheng New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Lizheng New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Kuliwei Industrial Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Kuliwei Industrial Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shijia Building Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shijia Building Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Chenxing Building Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Chenxing Building Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yonghe Sports Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yonghe Sports Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Guangzhou Hcb Office Equipment Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Hcb Office Equipment Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Sanye Freezer Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Sanye Freezer Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Jinpan Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Jinpan Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Yongwei Metal Produce Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Yongwei Metal Produce Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Linyi Yachen Wood Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Linyi Yachen Wood Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Smile Tools Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Smile Tools Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yantai Rima Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yantai Rima Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaoguan Skymen Ultrasonic Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shaoguan Skymen Ultrasonic Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Becoan Industrial Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Becoan Industrial Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Dingzhu Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Dingzhu Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Rjc Industrial Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Rjc Industrial Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Lianying Education And Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Lianying Education And Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Ginari Gates Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Ginari Gates Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Tti Fiber Communication Tech. Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Tti Fiber Communication Tech. Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Chongqing Zhongnan Julong Industrial Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chongqing Zhongnan Julong Industrial Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jilin Deyuanxin Agricultural Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jilin Deyuanxin Agricultural Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Abm Magnetics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Abm Magnetics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Kaili Special Automobile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Kaili Special Automobile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Honha Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Honha Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Jiujiu New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Jiujiu New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026