Shanghai Infraswin Energy Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Shanghai Infraswin Energy Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Shanghai, with a reported factory area of 9,800+ m² and 90+ staff. The company appears to operate as a medium-sized industrial supplier with verified supplier status and platform support, including 4 years as a Gold Supplier and Trade Assurance availability. Its listed products focus on industrial electrical control panel-related offerings, including low-voltage 380V systems, servo PLC control panels, and UL508A/CE-related product listings, with MOQ generally at 1 set, suggesting suitability for project-based or customized industrial procurement. However, recent business validation is limited: only 1 order and 1 review were recorded in the past six months, although the transaction value reached CN¥135.2K+ and the store rating is 5.0. Delivery performance is strong at 100.0% on-time delivery, but the low order sample size should be considered. Overall, this supplier is suitable for cautious trial cooperation, especially for buyers seeking low-MOQ industrial electrical control panel solutions.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Factory location: Shanghai, China
• Factory area: 9,800+ m²
• Employees: 90+ staff
• Verified supplier / factory audit status: True
• Product listings indicate industrial electrical control panel-related products

Elaboration

The supplier has a relatively solid physical production base, with a reported factory area of more than 9,800 m² and over 90 staff. This scale suggests the company is beyond a very small workshop operation and has the basic capacity to support industrial project orders. The verified supplier status adds credibility to the declared factory presence and operational background.

However, the available data does not provide detailed production capacity, annual output, number of production lines, machinery list, engineering team size, or internal quality-control staffing. Therefore, while the company can be assessed as a medium-scale supplier, there is insufficient data to classify it as a large-scale, highly mature supply-chain organization.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates stable mid-level company strength due to its nearly 10,000 m² factory area, 90+ employees, and verified supplier status. These indicators support a reasonable level of production capability for industrial electrical panel projects. However, the absence of detailed capacity data prevents a higher score associated with large-scale or fully mature supply-chain operations.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 4 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Platform tags: “Response time ≤3h”, “On-time delivery 100.0%”
• Verified supplier / factory audit status: True
• Certification / compliance information outside product titles: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators. A 4-year Gold Supplier history indicates an established presence, while Trade Assurance support improves transaction security for buyers. The verified supplier status further strengthens the supplier’s platform reliability.

The product titles reference UL, CE, and UL508A-related descriptions, but the provided platform certification/industry tag field only includes response time and on-time delivery information. No separate certificate documents, certificate numbers, issuing bodies, expiry dates, or factory compliance audit reports are included in the supplied data. Therefore, certification completeness cannot be fully verified from the available information.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has core credibility elements: Gold Supplier membership, 4 years of platform history, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status. These are meaningful trust signals. However, the certification label information is not complete enough to confirm a fully developed compliance system. As a result, the supplier fits the “core certifications and platform credibility are present, but not fully comprehensive” range.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Orders in past 6 months: 1
• Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥135.2K+
• Store rating: 5.0
• Number of reviews: 1

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded commercial activity in the past six months, with 1 order and transaction value above CN¥135.2K. This indicates that at least one relatively high-value transaction has occurred recently. The store rating is 5.0, which is positive, but the rating is based on only 1 review.

The main limitation is the very small sample size. One order and one review are not enough to establish strong evidence of consistent market acceptance, repeat purchasing, or large-scale transaction performance. The transaction amount is not negligible, but the limited order count reduces confidence in sustained commercial performance.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows some business validation through a recent transaction and a perfect store rating. However, the order volume and review count are both very low, making the business performance data insufficient for a high score. The transaction value partially offsets the weak order count, but the supplier still falls into the lower commercial validation range.

Final Score

11 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤3h
• Platform tag: “Response time ≤3h”
• Full Customization support: Insufficient Data
• Product title includes “Customizable” in one listing, but no formal customization capability data is provided

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of ≤3 hours is acceptable for B2B communication and indicates a reasonable level of responsiveness. This is not as strong as suppliers responding within one hour, but it is still within a practical range for procurement communication.

Regarding customization, one product listing includes the word “Customizable,” but the provided data does not confirm whether the supplier supports full customization, OEM/ODM service, engineering customization, drawing-based production, or custom control panel design. Therefore, full customization capability must be marked as Insufficient Data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates normal communication efficiency with a response time within three hours. This supports a mid-level service score. However, because full customization capability is not clearly verified, the score cannot reach the highest range. The supplier appears serviceable for inquiry-based procurement but requires further confirmation for complex customized projects.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is excellent under the provided scoring standard. This indicates that recorded deliveries were completed on schedule.

However, this delivery performance should be interpreted together with the business performance data. Since only 1 order was recorded in the past six months, the on-time delivery percentage may be based on a small sample size. The available data supports a high score, but buyers should still verify lead time, production schedule, and delivery terms before placing larger or repeat orders.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring rule, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. The supplier’s reported 100.0% rate meets the top category. The limited order sample should be noted as a risk factor, but the provided delivery metric itself is strong.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Store rating: 5.0
• Number of reviews: 1
• Verified supplier / factory audit status: True
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
• Factory Verification: True
• Product titles reference UL, CE, and UL508A, but supporting certification documents are not provided

Elaboration

The supplier has a perfect 5.0 store rating, which is positive, but the rating is based on only 1 review. This means customer feedback is favorable but not statistically strong. The verified supplier status provides some assurance regarding factory legitimacy and supplier background.

Quality assurance information is only partially available. There is no provided evidence of Finished Product Inspection, formal quality-control workflow, inspection reports, testing equipment, defect rate, or third-party quality certifications. Product titles include UL, CE, and UL508A-related wording, but the supplied data does not include certification documents or verification details. Therefore, these references should not be treated as fully validated quality-system evidence.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier receives credit for a 5.0 rating and factory verification, but the very low review count and lack of Finished Product Inspection data limit confidence in consistent quality performance. The current information supports a moderate quality score rather than a high one.

Final Score

13 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional cooperation recommended.

Shanghai Infraswin Energy Co., Ltd. shows acceptable supplier fundamentals, including a 9,800+ m² factory area, 90+ staff, verified supplier status, 4 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and 100.0% reported on-time delivery. These indicators make the supplier suitable for cautious trial procurement, especially for buyers seeking industrial electrical control panel-related products with low MOQ requirements.

Suitable customer types:
- Project-based industrial buyers requiring low-MOQ orders
- Buyers seeking electrical control panel-related products from a verified China-based supplier
- Procurement teams willing to conduct sample orders or initial trial projects before scaling

Main risk points:
- Only 1 order in the past 6 months
- Only 1 customer review, despite a 5.0 rating
- Finished Product Inspection data: Insufficient Data
- Full Customization capability: Insufficient Data
- Product certification claims require document-level verification before technical procurement decisions

Growth potential:
The supplier has a reasonable factory base, platform credibility, and strong reported delivery performance. If it can provide more certification documents, quality inspection evidence, and accumulate more transaction records and reviews, its procurement attractiveness could improve significantly.