Shenzhen Remax Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Supplier Evaluation Report: Shenzhen Remax Technology Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Shenzhen Remax Technology Co., Ltd. is a Guangdong-based supplier with a reported factory area of 5,100+㎡ and 250+ staff, indicating a mid-sized manufacturing operation with established production capacity. The supplier has been an Gold Supplier for 7 years, supports Trade Assurance, and is marked as a verified supplier, providing a relatively strong platform credibility foundation. Its recent business performance is solid, with 400+ orders and CN¥11.4M+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.7 store rating and 100+ reviews. The supplier demonstrates strong delivery reliability with a 97.1% on-time delivery rate. However, available data does not confirm Full Customization capability or Finished Product Inspection, which limits the assessment of advanced service and quality assurance systems. Overall, this supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking established consumer electronics-related products such as power banks and wireless charging products, especially buyers requiring reliable delivery and proven transaction history.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

• Company name: Shenzhen Remax Technology Co., Ltd.
• Country/Region: China, Guangdong
• Factory area: 5,100+㎡
• Employees: 250+ staff
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a reported factory size of over 5,100 square meters and more than 250 employees. This indicates a meaningful production base rather than a very small trading operation. The staff size suggests the company has the manpower to support regular production, order handling, and operational coordination. The supplier is also marked as a verified supplier, which provides additional confidence that basic company and factory-related information has been checked through the platform or verification process.

However, the available data does not provide deeper details such as number of production lines, monthly output capacity, machinery list, R&D team size, warehouse capacity, or factory audit reports beyond the verified supplier status. Therefore, while the supplier appears to have stable mid-sized operational strength, it cannot be classified as a fully large-scale supply chain based only on the provided information.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates stronger-than-basic production capability due to its 5,100+㎡ facility, 250+ staff, and verified supplier status. These indicators support a conclusion of a stable medium-sized factory. However, the data does not show large-scale manufacturing metrics such as extensive production capacity, multiple production bases, or detailed factory certification records. As a result, the supplier fits best within the “medium stable factory” range rather than the top-tier large-scale supply chain category.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 7 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier: True
• Certification/industry tags:
• On-time delivery 97.1%
• Response time ≤2h

Elaboration

The supplier has maintained Gold Supplier status for 7 years, which indicates a relatively long platform operating history. Trade Assurance support adds an important transaction protection mechanism for buyers, especially for payment security and order dispute handling within the platform framework. The verified supplier status further strengthens credibility by showing that the supplier has passed a basic verification process.

The available certification or industry tags mainly relate to operational performance, including delivery and response time. These are useful commercial indicators, but the data does not include independent product certifications, management system certifications, or specific factory audit certificates. Therefore, platform credibility is strong, while broader compliance certification completeness cannot be fully confirmed from the provided data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has several important credibility signals: 7 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. These factors place it above suppliers with only basic platform presence. The 7-year Gold Supplier history is especially valuable because it suggests platform continuity and lower short-term credibility risk. However, the absence of detailed certification data prevents a perfect score, as compliance depth beyond platform verification remains unclear.

Final Score

18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

• Orders in past 6 months: 400+
• Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥11.4M+
• Store rating: 4.7
• Reviews: 100+

Elaboration

The supplier has achieved more than 400 orders and over CN¥11.4 million in transaction value within the past six months. This reflects active commercial performance and a proven ability to attract and fulfill orders on the platform. The transaction value is significant enough to indicate that the supplier is not merely receiving small trial orders, but has meaningful sales volume.

The store rating of 4.7 is positive, though not at the highest possible level. The review count of 100+ provides a reasonable feedback base, making the rating more reliable than suppliers with only a very small number of reviews. Overall, the data shows strong market validation and active buyer engagement.

Scoring Rationale

The combination of 400+ orders and CN¥11.4M+ transaction value in six months demonstrates strong recent business activity. The 4.7 rating and 100+ reviews further support that the supplier has accumulated buyer feedback and operational experience. The score is high because commercial validation is clear. It is not assigned a maximum score because the rating, while good, is not exceptionally high, and the review count is solid but not extremely large.

Final Score

18 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤2h
• Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time is listed as ≤2 hours, which indicates relatively efficient communication. For procurement purposes, a response window within two hours is generally favorable for inquiry handling, quotation clarification, order coordination, and issue follow-up.

However, the provided data does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization. There is also no information about design support, OEM/ODM capability, packaging customization, logo customization, engineering support, sample lead time, or multilingual service capacity. Therefore, service capability can be assessed positively for responsiveness, but customization depth remains unverified.

Scoring Rationale

The response time of ≤2 hours supports a good service score because the supplier appears responsive and commercially active. However, the scoring criteria give higher marks to suppliers with response time ≤1 hour and strong customization capability. Since the response time is not within the top response band and Full Customization information is unavailable, the supplier should be scored in the normal-to-good service range rather than the highest range.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 97.1%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is 97.1%, which is a strong delivery performance indicator. This suggests that the supplier has been able to fulfill most orders within the expected delivery schedule. For buyers, especially those managing inventory cycles, promotional sales, or repeat replenishment, this level of delivery reliability is commercially valuable.

No additional logistics details are provided, such as average lead time, shipping methods, urgent order handling, or export documentation capability. Therefore, the assessment is based strictly on the available on-time delivery rate.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. At 97.1%, the supplier significantly exceeds the 90% threshold and demonstrates strong delivery reliability. Because the data directly supports a high delivery score, this dimension receives a near-maximum assessment.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

• Store rating: 4.7
• Reviews: 100+
• Verified supplier: True
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
• Factory Verification: Verified supplier status is provided

Elaboration

The supplier has a 4.7 store rating and more than 100 reviews, which indicates generally positive customer feedback with a meaningful review base. The verified supplier status also adds some quality-related confidence because basic supplier verification has been completed.

However, the provided data does not confirm Finished Product Inspection. There is also no specific information about product certifications, internal QC processes, inspection equipment, defect rates, return rates, warranty terms, or third-party quality audit results. As a result, the supplier shows good customer feedback and basic verification credibility, but the quality assurance system cannot be fully validated.

Scoring Rationale

The quality and customer feedback profile is positive due to the 4.7 rating, 100+ reviews, and verified supplier status. These data points suggest that the supplier has received consistent buyer engagement and generally favorable evaluations. However, the lack of confirmed Finished Product Inspection prevents the supplier from reaching the top scoring band. The score reflects good but not fully comprehensive quality assurance visibility.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for cooperation, with standard supplier qualification checks before bulk purchasing.

Shenzhen Remax Technology Co., Ltd. shows strong platform credibility, stable commercial performance, and excellent delivery reliability. The supplier is suitable for buyers seeking consumer electronics-related products listed in the provided data, including power banks and wireless charging products. It is especially appropriate for small to medium-volume buyers, online retailers, distributors, and procurement teams that value low MOQ options, active transaction history, and reliable on-time shipment.

Main risks include insufficient available data on Full Customization capability, Finished Product Inspection, detailed product certifications, and deeper factory audit documentation. Before placing large-volume or customized orders, buyers should request confirmation of customization scope, inspection process, product compliance documents, sample approval procedures, and after-sales terms.

The supplier’s growth potential appears positive based on its 7-year Gold Supplier history, 400+ recent orders, CN¥11.4M+ six-month transaction value, and 97.1% on-time delivery rate. Overall, it is a commercially validated supplier with strong operational indicators, though additional quality and compliance verification is recommended for high-value or regulated procurement projects.