zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Yiwu Yuefang E-Commerce Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Yiwu Yuefang E-Commerce Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Zhejiang, with a reported factory area of over 6,700 m² and more than 150 staff. Based on the provided data, the company appears to be a medium-sized supplier with basic-to-solid production capacity and verified supplier status. Its product listings focus on customizable men’s apparel-related items, with low MOQ of 1 piece and pricing mainly in the CN¥128.47–283.98 range. On , the supplier holds Gold Supplier status for 1 year, supports Trade Assurance, and carries platform labels including Full Customization, ODM service available, Low MOQ for customization, and Finished Product Inspection. Business performance is still limited in scale, with 10+ orders and CN¥338K+ transaction value in the past six months. The store rating is 5.0, but the review base is very small, with only 1 review. This supplier is suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ customization and sample-stage sourcing, while larger-volume buyers should further verify capacity, quality consistency, and operational stability.

Yiwu Yuefang E-Commerce Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

  • Company name: Yiwu Yuefang E-Commerce Co., Ltd.
  • Location: Zhejiang, China
  • Factory area: 6,700+ m²
  • Employees: 150+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier reports a factory area of more than 6,700 m² and a workforce exceeding 150 employees. This indicates a production base larger than a small workshop and suggests the company has a structured operational setup. The presence of verified supplier status provides an additional basic level of credibility regarding the company’s business identity or supplier profile. However, the provided data does not include specific information on monthly production capacity, production lines, machinery, export volume, major customers, or internationally recognized factory certifications.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates characteristics of a medium-sized factory rather than a very small trading entity. The factory size and employee count support a reasonable level of production capability, especially for apparel customization and low-MOQ orders. However, there is insufficient data to classify it as a large-scale stable supply chain, because detailed production capacity, factory audit results, and formal factory certifications are not provided. Therefore, the score falls within the “medium stable factory” range.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 1 year
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Certification / industry labels:
  • Low MOQ for customization
  • Finished product inspection
  • ODM service available
  • Full customization

Elaboration

The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. These features improve buyer protection and platform-level trust. The supplier also carries several operational labels related to customization and inspection, which are relevant for buyers seeking customized apparel products. However, the Gold Supplier history is only 1 year, which means the platform track record is still relatively short. No additional third-party compliance certifications, social audits, product compliance documents, or export-market certifications are provided in the data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has the core credibility elements required for basic transaction security: Gold Supplier membership, Trade Assurance, and verification. The certification labels are also relatively complete for customization-oriented sourcing. However, because the Gold Supplier duration is only 1 year, the long-term credibility record is limited. The absence of additional compliance documentation also prevents a higher score. The supplier is credible at a platform level, but not yet proven as a long-established high-trust supplier.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 10+
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥338K+
  • Store rating: 5.0
  • Number of reviews: 1

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded more than 10 orders and over CN¥338K in transaction value during the past six months. This indicates some active commercial performance on the platform. The average transaction value appears meaningful relative to the low order count, suggesting that at least some transactions may be of moderate value; however, the data does not provide order size, buyer type, repeat purchase rate, or product-specific sales breakdown. The store rating is 5.0, but the rating is supported by only 1 review, making the feedback base too limited to strongly validate commercial reliability.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has measurable transaction activity, which is positive, but the order volume is relatively low. The transaction amount of CN¥338K+ is not negligible, but with only 10+ orders and 1 review, the commercial validation remains limited. A 5.0 rating is favorable, but the very small review count weakens its reliability as a performance indicator. Therefore, the supplier should be viewed as commercially active but not yet strongly proven by a large number of platform orders or customer evaluations.

Final Score

12 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

  • Response time: ≤2h
  • Full Customization: True
  • ODM service available: True
  • Low MOQ for customization: True

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time is reported as within 2 hours, which is acceptable for international sourcing communication. The supplier also supports Full Customization and ODM service, indicating flexibility in product development and customization requests. The Low MOQ for customization label, together with product MOQs of 1 piece, suggests suitability for sampling, small-batch orders, and customized trial orders. However, the response time is not stated as within 1 hour, so it does not meet the highest service-performance benchmark under the provided scoring framework.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates strong customization capability based on the listed platform labels. The response time of ≤2h is commercially reasonable and supports efficient early-stage communication, but it is slightly below the top-tier standard of ≤1h. Since the supplier has Full Customization and ODM capability but does not meet the fastest response benchmark, the score is placed at the upper end of the normal-to-good service range.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The provided on-time delivery rate is 100.0%, which is the strongest delivery indicator available in the dataset. This suggests that, based on platform-recorded or provided performance data, the supplier has met delivery timelines for recorded transactions. However, the data does not include the number of shipments behind this rate, shipment destinations, lead times, or performance under peak-season or bulk-order conditions.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the supplier’s reported rate is 100.0%, it reaches the highest delivery-performance range. The only limitation is that the order base appears relatively small, but the scoring criterion for this dimension is directly tied to on-time delivery rate.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

  • Store rating: 5.0
  • Number of reviews: 1
  • Finished Product Inspection: True
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a perfect store rating of 5.0, which is positive, and it carries a Finished Product Inspection label, indicating that some form of final product inspection process is presented on the platform. Verified supplier status also supports a basic quality and credibility foundation. However, the customer feedback base is extremely limited, with only 1 review. This makes it difficult to determine whether the quality performance is consistent across multiple buyers, repeat orders, or larger production batches. No defect rate, inspection reports, quality certificates, fabric test reports, or customer complaint data are provided.

Scoring Rationale

The quality-related indicators are mixed. On one hand, the supplier has a 5.0 rating, Finished Product Inspection, and verified supplier status, which support a positive quality-control profile. On the other hand, only 1 review is insufficient to strongly validate customer satisfaction or long-term quality consistency. Because the formal quality assurance data is limited and the review base is very small, the supplier cannot be rated in the highest quality-feedback range. It is more appropriate to score it as having good basic quality indicators but limited customer validation.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 16 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 16 / 20
Business Performance 12 / 20
Service Capability 8 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 15 / 20
Total Score 77 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional cooperation recommended.

Yiwu Yuefang E-Commerce Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking customizable men’s apparel products, especially those requiring low MOQ, sample orders, ODM support, and flexible customization. The supplier’s 6,700+ m² factory area, 150+ staff, verified supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and 100% on-time delivery rate are positive procurement indicators.

However, buyers should treat this supplier as a promising but still commercially early-stage platform supplier, because the Gold Supplier history is only 1 year, the past-six-month order volume is 10+, and the review count is only 1. The main risks are limited customer feedback, insufficient long-term platform transaction history, and lack of detailed production capacity or third-party compliance certification data.

For procurement, it is advisable to start with sample orders or small trial batches, verify customization quality, request inspection records where applicable, and confirm lead time, material specifications, packaging, and after-sales terms before scaling to larger orders. The supplier shows growth potential due to its customization labels, low MOQ model, and current delivery performance.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Yiwu Hanzi E-Commerce  Firm Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Hanzi E-Commerce Firm Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Furui E-Commerce Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Furui E-Commerce Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Kangkai E-Commerce Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Kangkai E-Commerce Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Zhulu Electronic Commerce Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Zhulu Electronic Commerce Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Jiuling Electronic Commerce Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Jiuling Electronic Commerce Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Everich Commerce Group Limited Supplier Evaluation
Everich Commerce Group Limited Supplier Evaluation
Jieyang Yasiqiao E-Commerce Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jieyang Yasiqiao E-Commerce Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Firemax E-Commerce (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Firemax E-Commerce (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Yunliang E-Commerce Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Yunliang E-Commerce Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Aikesi E-Commerce Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Aikesi E-Commerce Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Jiexu Commerce Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Jiexu Commerce Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wanwuhuo (Shenzhen) E-Commerce Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wanwuhuo (Shenzhen) E-Commerce Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Fangwu E-Commerce Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Fangwu E-Commerce Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Enping Yinpeng E-Commerce Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Enping Yinpeng E-Commerce Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Fulaier E-Commerce Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Fulaier E-Commerce Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Yzm Commerce & Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Yzm Commerce & Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian New Shiying E-Commerce Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian New Shiying E-Commerce Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Gonglue Commerce And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Gonglue Commerce And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Zhengcheng Commerce And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Zhengcheng Commerce And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jakx Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jakx Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Shanghai Jixiang Building Materials Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Jixiang Building Materials Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Zhengkun Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Zhengkun Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Danqiu International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Danqiu International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yancheng Xieying Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yancheng Xieying Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Rongze Building Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Rongze Building Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Awind Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Awind Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Huiren Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Huiren Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Liaoning Shuanghua Welding & Cutting Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Liaoning Shuanghua Welding & Cutting Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lengshuijiang Songye Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lengshuijiang Songye Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui He He New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui He He New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lingshou Yongqi Mineral Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lingshou Yongqi Mineral Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Freefly Paper Packaging Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Freefly Paper Packaging Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Hefei Skyfly Enterprise Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hefei Skyfly Enterprise Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Guanglei Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Guanglei Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Mingyang Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Mingyang Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Titan Smart Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Titan Smart Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhenjiang Kimtex Industrial Inc. Supplier Evaluation
Zhenjiang Kimtex Industrial Inc. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Huihao Packing Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Huihao Packing Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Beehive Aquaculture Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Beehive Aquaculture Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dalian Ruici Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dalian Ruici Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026