Hefei Skyfly Enterprise Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Hefei Skyfly Enterprise Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Anhui, with a reported factory area of over 6,900 m² and more than 100 staff. Based on the provided data, the company appears to be a medium-sized manufacturing supplier focused on plastic digital/scientific calculators, with multiple listed calculator products and MOQ levels ranging from 1,200 pieces to 50,000 pieces. The supplier is an Gold Supplier for 4 years, supports Trade Assurance, and is marked as a verified supplier, which provides a moderate level of platform credibility. Its delivery performance is strong, with a reported 100.0% on-time delivery rate. However, commercial validation is limited by only 10+ orders in the past six months and only 1 customer review, despite a transaction value of CN¥878.9K+. This supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking low-cost calculator products with verified platform protection, but buyers should further validate quality consistency before large-scale procurement.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Company name: Hefei Skyfly Enterprise Co., Ltd.
• Country: China
• Province: Anhui
• Factory area: 6,900+ m²
• Staff: 100+ staff
• Verified supplier / factory verification status: True
• Main listed products: plastic mini digital/scientific calculators

Elaboration

The supplier has a reported factory area of more than 6,900 m² and over 100 employees, which indicates a medium-sized production operation rather than a small trading-only entity. The presence of verified supplier status strengthens the credibility of the company’s operational base. The product listings are concentrated around calculator products, suggesting a relatively focused product category rather than a highly diversified portfolio.

However, the provided data does not include annual production capacity, number of production lines, machinery details, export volume, factory audit reports, or specific manufacturing certifications. Therefore, while the company demonstrates a stable basic production foundation, the available information is not sufficient to classify it as a large-scale supply chain provider.

Scoring Rationale

The company meets the profile of a medium-sized stable factory: it has a measurable factory area, a workforce of over 100 staff, and verified supplier status. These indicators support a reasonable level of production capability. However, the absence of detailed capacity data and factory certification details limits the score from reaching the highest range.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 4 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier: True
• Certification / platform tags:
• Low MOQ for customization
• Response time ≤3h
• On-time delivery 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier has a 4-year Gold Supplier history and supports Trade Assurance, both of which provide platform-level transaction protection and credibility. The verified supplier status further improves buyer confidence, particularly for overseas procurement where direct factory inspection may not always be immediately possible.

The listed platform tags also show operational indicators such as response time and delivery performance. However, the data does not provide detailed third-party certification names, audit reports, ISO certificates, product compliance certificates, or industry-specific compliance documentation. Therefore, the supplier has a solid platform credibility foundation, but the compliance profile is not fully comprehensive.

Scoring Rationale

A 4-year Gold Supplier record, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status represent a credible platform presence. The supplier has the core elements expected from a reasonably reliable vendor. However, the Gold Supplier duration is moderate rather than long-term, and the absence of specific certification documents prevents the supplier from being scored in the top tier.

Final Score

17 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: 10+
• Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥878.9K+
• Store rating: 4.0
• Number of reviews: 1

Elaboration

The supplier has achieved more than CN¥878.9K in transaction value over the past six months, which indicates some commercial activity and buyer engagement. However, the order count of 10+ is relatively limited, suggesting that the transaction volume may be concentrated in a small number of orders rather than broad-based customer demand.

The store rating of 4.0 is acceptable but not particularly strong, and the review count is only 1. This creates a significant limitation in evaluating actual customer satisfaction, repeatability of service quality, and post-delivery performance. From a procurement risk perspective, the transaction value is a positive signal, but the lack of review depth reduces confidence in broader market validation.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows measurable commercial performance through recent transaction value, but the limited number of orders and extremely low review count weaken the business validation. A 4.0 rating based on only one review is not enough to confirm consistent buyer satisfaction. Therefore, the supplier falls into the lower-to-mid business performance range.

Final Score

12 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤3h
• Platform tag: Low MOQ for customization
• Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time is reported as within 3 hours, which is acceptable for international B2B communication, though it does not meet the strongest benchmark of response within 1 hour. The platform tag “Low MOQ for customization” suggests that the supplier may support some level of customization at lower order quantities.

However, the data does not explicitly confirm Full Customization capability. There is also no information on design support, packaging customization, private label service, sample lead time, dedicated account management, or multilingual communication capacity. As a result, the supplier demonstrates basic service responsiveness but cannot be confirmed as a strong customization partner based on the provided data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a reasonable response time and some indication of customization flexibility through the “Low MOQ for customization” tag. However, because Full Customization is not confirmed and detailed service capabilities are not provided, the supplier should be scored as having normal but not advanced service capability.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is a strong delivery performance indicator. For procurement planning, this suggests that the supplier has demonstrated reliable dispatch performance on the platform within the measured period.

However, the data does not specify the total number of shipments included in this metric, average lead time, production lead time, logistics mode, or performance under peak-season order pressure. Therefore, while the reported on-time delivery rate is excellent, buyers should still verify delivery timelines for specific order quantities and customization requirements.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring criteria, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the supplier’s reported rate is 100.0%, it deserves the maximum score for this dimension. The limited shipment sample information is noted as a risk factor, but the available metric itself is strong.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Store rating: 4.0
• Number of reviews: 1
• Verified supplier / factory verification: True
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
• Product category: digital/scientific calculators

Elaboration

The supplier has a store rating of 4.0, but this rating is based on only 1 review. This makes the customer feedback base very limited and insufficient for drawing strong conclusions about consistent quality performance. The verified supplier status provides some confidence in the legitimacy of the business, but it does not replace product-level inspection records or broader customer feedback.

There is no provided evidence of Finished Product Inspection, product testing procedures, quality control certifications, defect rate data, warranty terms, or third-party inspection reports. For calculator products, buyers may need to verify functional accuracy, button durability, display quality, battery performance, packaging quality, and compliance requirements separately before committing to bulk orders.

Scoring Rationale

The verified supplier status supports a basic level of quality assurance credibility. However, the very low review count, moderate 4.0 rating, and absence of Finished Product Inspection data limit confidence in long-term quality consistency. The supplier cannot be rated highly in this dimension without more customer feedback or documented inspection systems.

Final Score

12 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional Cooperation Recommended

Hefei Skyfly Enterprise Co., Ltd. can be considered for cooperation, especially for buyers looking for cost-sensitive calculator products with Trade Assurance protection and verified supplier status. The supplier appears suitable for small to medium-sized importers, wholesalers, school/office supply distributors, and buyers testing calculator product lines with moderate MOQ requirements.

Suitable customer types:
- Buyers sourcing plastic digital or scientific calculators
- Importers requiring platform-backed transaction protection
- Wholesalers seeking low unit-price calculator products
- Buyers willing to conduct pre-shipment inspection before scaling orders

Main risks:
- Only 1 customer review, limiting customer feedback reliability
- Store rating is 4.0, not high enough to indicate strong market satisfaction
- Finished Product Inspection data is not provided
- Full Customization capability is not confirmed
- Limited order count of 10+ in the past six months

Growth potential:
The supplier has a solid operational base, verified supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and excellent reported on-time delivery performance. If it can improve review volume, provide clearer quality inspection documentation, and demonstrate stronger customization capability, its procurement attractiveness could increase significantly. For initial cooperation, buyers should start with sample evaluation or a controlled trial order, followed by third-party inspection before larger-scale purchasing.