zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Foshan Yuyixian Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Foshan Yuyixian Electronics Co., Ltd. is a Guangdong-based supplier focused on LED and smart TV products, including Full HD LED Smart TVs, big-screen TVs, OEM/ODM 4K Android Smart TVs, and custom LED TV offerings. The supplier reports a factory area of over 3,100㎡ and is marked as a verified supplier, but employee count is not provided, which limits the visibility of its full production scale. On , the company has 1 year of Gold Supplier status, supports Trade Assurance, and carries relevant platform labels including Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, Warranty Available, and 100.0% On-time Delivery. Business performance shows 20+ orders and CN¥67.6K+ transaction value over the past six months, with a 5.0 store rating but only 1 review. Overall, this supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking flexible, low-MOQ TV sourcing, OEM/ODM customization, and responsive communication, while larger buyers should further verify production capacity, staffing, and quality consistency before placing high-volume orders.

Foshan Yuyixian Electronics Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Company: Foshan Yuyixian Electronics Co., Ltd.
  • Location: Guangdong, China
  • Factory area: 3,100+㎡
  • Employee count: Insufficient Data
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Product scope shown: LED Smart TV, big-screen TV, OEM/ODM 4K Android Smart TV, custom LED TV products

Elaboration

The supplier has a declared factory area of over 3,100㎡, which indicates a physical manufacturing or assembly base of reasonable size for TV-related products. The verified supplier status adds a basic level of credibility to the company’s operational existence and factory profile. The product listings show a focused product category around LED TVs, smart TVs, big-screen models, and OEM/ODM television products, suggesting specialization rather than a highly scattered product portfolio.

However, the absence of employee count creates a limitation in assessing actual production depth, labor capacity, production line scale, and ability to handle large or urgent orders. Factory area alone is useful, but without staffing, machinery, monthly output, or production line data, the company’s full manufacturing strength cannot be confirmed.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates more than a basic trading profile because it has a stated factory area and verified supplier status. Its 3,100+㎡ facility suggests small-to-medium production capability rather than a large-scale industrial operation. The lack of employee data prevents assigning a higher score, as workforce size is a key indicator of capacity stability, production flexibility, and scalability. Therefore, the supplier fits the profile of a small-to-medium verified factory with basic-to-stable production capability, but not enough evidence supports classification as a large-scale stable supply chain.

Final Score

14 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 1 year
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Certification / platform labels:
  • Warranty available
  • Finished product inspection
  • Full customization
  • On-time delivery 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. These features provide a baseline level of transactional protection and platform-backed credibility. The presence of labels such as Finished Product Inspection and Warranty Available further strengthens the supplier’s compliance and buyer protection profile within the platform environment.

However, the Gold Supplier duration is only 1 year, which means the supplier has a relatively short visible history on the platform. While the listed labels are positive, there is no additional data provided regarding third-party factory audit reports, management system certifications, export certifications, or product compliance certifications. Therefore, the platform credibility is solid at the basic-to-intermediate level but not yet mature enough to be considered long-term proven.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier meets several core credibility requirements: Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, verified status, and multiple useful platform labels. These factors support a reliable initial sourcing profile. The main limitation is the short Gold Supplier tenure of 1 year, which restricts long-term platform trust assessment. Since no additional external compliance certifications are provided, the score should remain below the top range.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in past 6 months: 20+
  • Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥67.6K+
  • Store rating: 5.0
  • Number of reviews: 1

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded more than 20 orders over the past six months, showing that it has active buyer engagement and recent transaction history. The transaction value of CN¥67.6K+ indicates some commercial traction, although it remains moderate in scale. A 5.0 store rating is positive, but the rating is based on only 1 review, which limits the reliability of the customer satisfaction indicator.

For procurement evaluation, the order count shows that buyers are placing orders, but the low number of reviews and moderate transaction value suggest that market validation is still limited. The business performance data supports initial trust, but it does not yet demonstrate strong volume, broad buyer acceptance, or highly proven repeat business.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows real recent activity, which is better than having no transaction record. However, 20+ orders and CN¥67.6K+ transaction value over six months do not represent a high-volume commercial profile. The 5.0 rating is favorable but statistically weak due to only 1 review. Therefore, the supplier should be scored as having low-to-moderate business validation rather than strong commercial performance.

Final Score

12 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Response time: ≤1h
  • Full customization label: Available
  • Product listings include OEM/ODM and custom TV options

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates strong service responsiveness with a response time of less than or equal to one hour. This is a positive indicator for buyers who require fast quotation cycles, sample discussion, customization communication, or order coordination. The platform label “Full customization” and product descriptions including OEM/ODM and custom LED TV offerings indicate that the supplier supports customization-oriented business.

The available data does not include details such as engineering team size, design support process, sample lead time, after-sales handling speed, or dedicated account service. Therefore, the service capability assessment is based mainly on response speed and customization availability.

Scoring Rationale

A response time of ≤1h meets the highest standard for communication responsiveness. The supplier also supports Full Customization, which is especially relevant for OEM/ODM TV sourcing. Although more detailed service-process data is not available, the provided indicators are strong enough to justify a top-range score in this dimension.

Final Score

10 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 100.0%
  • Platform label also confirms: On-time delivery 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is the strongest available delivery indicator in the provided dataset. This suggests that recent orders measured by the platform were shipped within the committed time frame. For buyers, this is an important positive signal, especially when sourcing products such as TVs where shipment timing can affect retail planning, project delivery, or inventory scheduling.

However, the data does not provide the number of shipments used to calculate the on-time delivery rate, nor does it specify shipment destinations, order sizes, or logistics methods. Therefore, while the on-time rate is excellent, the scale behind the metric remains unclear.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the supplier’s reported rate is 100.0%, it deserves the maximum score. The only caution is that the dataset does not show the statistical base behind the rate, but the provided delivery performance itself is fully aligned with the highest scoring band.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: 5.0
  • Number of reviews: 1
  • Finished Product Inspection: Available
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Warranty available: Yes, based on platform label

Elaboration

The supplier has a 5.0 store rating, which is positive, but the rating is supported by only 1 review. This means customer feedback is not yet broad enough to confidently confirm consistent product quality across multiple buyers or order batches. The presence of Finished Product Inspection is a meaningful quality-control indicator, suggesting that completed goods are checked before delivery. Verified supplier status and warranty availability also provide some added quality assurance.

Nevertheless, the provided data does not include product defect rates, inspection standards, quality certificates, testing reports, warranty terms, return records, or detailed customer feedback content. Therefore, the quality system appears to have basic safeguards, but the customer feedback base is still too limited for a top-tier quality rating.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has important quality-related platform indicators, including Finished Product Inspection, verified supplier status, and warranty availability. The 5.0 rating is favorable, but with only 1 review, it cannot be treated as strong market-proven quality validation. As a result, the supplier should be rated in the “good but still limited evidence” range rather than the “high rating with large review base and complete quality system” range.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 14 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 16 / 20
Business Performance 12 / 20
Service Capability 10 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 15 / 20
Total Score 77 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional Cooperation Recommended

Foshan Yuyixian Electronics Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking LED TV and smart TV products with low MOQ, fast communication, and customization support. The supplier may be particularly appropriate for small to medium-sized buyers, sample testing, private-label exploration, OEM/ODM trial orders, and flexible sourcing projects where rapid response and Trade Assurance protection are important.

Suitable customer types:
- Small and medium importers testing TV product lines
- Buyers requiring OEM/ODM or custom LED/Smart TV options
- Buyers needing low MOQ procurement
- Buyers who value fast supplier response and platform transaction protection

Main risks:
- Employee count is not provided, limiting production capacity assessment
- Only 1 year of Gold Supplier history
- Business validation is moderate, with 20+ orders and CN¥67.6K+ transaction value in six months
- Store rating is 5.0 but based on only 1 review, so customer feedback depth is insufficient
- No detailed data on monthly production capacity, production lines, quality certifications, or inspection standards

Growth potential:
The supplier shows positive development potential due to verified supplier status, Trade Assurance support, Full Customization capability, Finished Product Inspection, fast response time, and 100.0% on-time delivery. If the company can provide more production-capacity data, expand transaction volume, accumulate more verified reviews, and disclose stronger quality documentation, its procurement rating could improve significantly.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Foshan Xincode Electronics Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Xincode Electronics Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Postek Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Postek Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qyt Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qyt Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Manorshi Electronics Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Manorshi Electronics Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
A-Knights Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
A-Knights Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jumboaudio Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jumboaudio Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tecoo Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tecoo Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Hxs Electronics Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Hxs Electronics Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianchang Trump Electronics Factory Supplier Evaluation
Tianchang Trump Electronics Factory Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Lesound Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Lesound Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Mestek Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Mestek Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Fangbei Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Fangbei Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ninghai Bright Electronics Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ninghai Bright Electronics Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Langtu Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Langtu Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Yitai Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Yitai Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Leadway Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Leadway Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Bluefinger Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Bluefinger Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Touchwo Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Touchwo Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Boluo Xurong Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Boluo Xurong Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Huasentong Intelligent Technology Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Huasentong Intelligent Technology Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Foshan Rogenilan Windows And Doors Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Rogenilan Windows And Doors Supplier Evaluation
Wuxi Tianyou Yongjia Filter Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuxi Tianyou Yongjia Filter Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chisung Intelligence Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Chisung Intelligence Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Easy Scaffolding Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Easy Scaffolding Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Golden Sail Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Golden Sail Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Wisdom Beidou Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Wisdom Beidou Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Zhengdong Lighting Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Zhengdong Lighting Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Laizhou Huibang Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Laizhou Huibang Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Luoyang E-Find Precision Bearing Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Luoyang E-Find Precision Bearing Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Ansen Medical Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Ansen Medical Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Fusmli Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Fusmli Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Dawoo Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Dawoo Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Enchi Garment Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Enchi Garment Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Ruihong Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Ruihong Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Anxing Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Anxing Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Baolida Metal Pipe Fittings Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Baolida Metal Pipe Fittings Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Victors Industrial (H.K.) Company Limited Supplier Evaluation
Victors Industrial (H.K.) Company Limited Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yongjia Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yongjia Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Kaixuan Seals Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Kaixuan Seals Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Topko Product Group Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Topko Product Group Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026