Wuxi Tianyou Yongjia Filter Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Wuxi Tianyou Yongjia Filter Manufacturing Co., Ltd. is a China-based filter manufacturer located in Jiangsu, with a reported factory area of 6,700+ m² and 50+ staff. The supplier appears focused on air filter products, including listed items for Husqvarna, Harley Davidson, Honda, and Kawasaki-related filter applications, with MOQs ranging from 500 to 1,000 pieces. The company has platform credibility through 7 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. It also lists customization-related capabilities, including Full Customization, Minor Customization, and ODM service availability. However, key commercial validation data is largely missing: past six-month order volume, transaction value, store rating, and customer review performance are either blank or show zero reviews. Delivery performance is also weak based on the provided 0.0% on-time shipment rate. This supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking filter products with customization options, but procurement should proceed cautiously due to insufficient transaction, rating, review, and delivery reliability data.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Jiangsu, China
- Factory area: 6,700+ m²
- Staff size: 50+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Product scope shown: multiple air filter products with MOQs of 500–1,000 pieces

Elaboration
The supplier has a defined manufacturing base with a reported factory area of over 6,700 m² and more than 50 employees. This indicates a real production setup with basic to moderate manufacturing capacity. The verified supplier status strengthens confidence that the company has undergone some level of platform or supplier verification. The product listings also suggest concentration in air filter manufacturing, which supports a focused production profile rather than a highly fragmented product range.

Scoring Rationale
The company does not appear to be a very large-scale manufacturer based on the provided staff count, but the factory area and verified supplier status support a stable small-to-medium production profile. Because the data confirms physical factory scale and staff size but does not provide deeper production capacity figures, annual output, machinery details, or factory certification documents, the score should remain in the medium range rather than the top tier.

Final Score
15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 7 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification / industry tags: Warranty available, Full customization, Minor customization, ODM service available

Elaboration
The supplier has a relatively strong platform credibility profile. A 7-year Gold Supplier history indicates a sustained presence on the platform, while Trade Assurance provides buyers with a transaction protection mechanism. The verified supplier status further supports credibility. The listed tags also show available commercial and customization services, though no formal international quality certifications, factory audit certificates, or industry-specific compliance documents are provided in the data.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier meets several important platform credibility indicators: long-term Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verification. These are meaningful trust signals for procurement screening. However, the available data does not show third-party factory certifications, ISO certificates, product compliance certificates, or detailed audit results. Therefore, the supplier deserves a strong score, but not a full score.

Final Score
18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Past six-month order volume: Insufficient Data
- Past six-month transaction value: Insufficient Data
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Number of reviews: 0

Elaboration
The supplier’s business performance cannot be strongly validated from the provided data. Key indicators such as recent order volume, recent transaction amount, and store rating are missing. The review count is listed as 0, which means there is no visible customer feedback record in the provided dataset to support commercial traction or buyer satisfaction.

Scoring Rationale
Because transaction volume, transaction value, and store rating are unavailable, the supplier lacks measurable business performance evidence. The zero review count further limits the ability to assess market acceptance or repeat buyer confidence. While the company has platform credibility, that does not directly prove recent sales performance. As a result, the score must remain low due to insufficient commercial validation.

Final Score
8 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤11h
- Full Customization: Available
- Minor Customization: Available
- ODM service: Available

Elaboration
The supplier provides customization-related service options, including full customization, minor customization, and ODM service availability. This suggests it can support buyers requiring product adaptation or tailored filter solutions within the scope of its listed capabilities. However, the response time of ≤11 hours is not highly competitive compared with suppliers responding within one hour.

Scoring Rationale
Customization capability is a positive service indicator, especially for procurement buyers requiring differentiated product specifications or private-label adaptation. However, the response time is moderate rather than fast. Since the strongest service score requires response within one hour combined with strong customization capability, this supplier should receive a mid-level service score.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time shipment rate: 0.0%

Elaboration
The provided on-time shipment rate is 0.0%, which is a serious concern for procurement planning. Delivery reliability is critical for buyers managing inventory continuity, project timelines, and downstream customer commitments. No additional delivery data is provided to clarify whether this rate reflects a lack of recorded shipments, actual late shipments, or incomplete platform data.

Scoring Rationale
Based strictly on the scoring rule, an on-time shipment rate below 70% should receive below 5 points. Since the provided rate is 0.0%, the delivery performance score must be very low. Although the absence of context may limit interpretation, the available figure does not support confidence in shipment reliability.

Final Score
2 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Number of reviews: 0
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification / Verified Supplier: True
- Warranty available: Listed

Elaboration
The supplier has some basic quality-related trust indicators, including verified supplier status and a warranty availability tag. However, there is no store rating, no customer review base, and no provided Finished Product Inspection information. This makes it difficult to evaluate actual buyer satisfaction, product consistency, or formal inspection controls.

Scoring Rationale
The verified supplier status provides some confidence that the business has been checked at a platform level, and the warranty tag is a positive commercial signal. However, the absence of customer ratings, zero reviews, and no stated Finished Product Inspection system significantly weaken quality validation. The supplier therefore falls into a lower scoring range due to insufficient customer feedback and incomplete quality assurance evidence.

Final Score
10 / 20

Total Score

60 / 100

Score breakdown:
- Company Strength: 15 / 20
- Platform & Compliance Credibility: 18 / 20
- Business Performance: 8 / 20
- Service Capability: 7 / 10
- Delivery Performance: 2 / 10
- Quality & Customer Feedback: 10 / 20

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation may be considered with caution. Wuxi Tianyou Yongjia Filter Manufacturing Co., Ltd. shows reasonable supplier fundamentals, including a verified factory profile, 6,700+ m² facility size, 50+ staff, 7 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and customization/ODM capabilities. These factors make it potentially suitable for buyers sourcing air filter products with moderate MOQ requirements and customization needs.

However, the main risks are significant: recent order volume, transaction value, store rating, and customer feedback are insufficient or unavailable, while the review count is 0. The reported 0.0% on-time shipment rate is the most critical concern and should be clarified before placing any major order.

Recommended buyer type: small to medium buyers, trial-order buyers, or procurement teams seeking customized air filter products after sample approval.
Not recommended for: urgent delivery projects, large-scale orders, or buyers requiring proven transaction history and strong customer feedback.

Suggested procurement approach: start with sample testing and a small trial order, confirm delivery terms in writing, request inspection evidence, and use Trade Assurance for payment protection.