Yangzhou Xuancheng Filter Screen Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Yangzhou Xuancheng Filter Screen Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Jiangsu, operating with a reported factory area of 5,000+ m² and 40+ staff. Its listed product range focuses on filter wire cloth, woven mesh, filter band mesh, black steel mesh rolls, and stainless steel-related mesh products, indicating a specialized position in industrial filtration and mesh materials. The supplier has a verified supplier status, 5 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, ≤1h response time, and 100.0% on-time delivery, which provides a credible platform and delivery foundation. However, recent transaction performance is modest, with 10+ orders and CN¥33.8K+ transaction value in the past six months. The store rating is strong at 4.9, but only 3 reviews are available, limiting the reliability of customer feedback. This supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking small-to-medium volume mesh/filter sourcing with fast communication and strong delivery reliability, while larger buyers should conduct additional qualification checks before scaling procurement.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory area: 5,000+ m²
- Employees: 40+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Factory location: Jiangsu, China

Elaboration
The supplier has a defined factory footprint and employee base, suggesting it has basic in-house operational capacity rather than being only a trading profile. A 5,000+ m² facility is meaningful for mesh and filter screen production, but the staff count of 40+ indicates a small-to-medium-sized operation rather than a large-scale industrial manufacturer.

Scoring Rationale
The company demonstrates stable foundational production capacity through its factory area, employee count, and verified supplier status. However, the available data does not show large employee scale, multiple production sites, advanced manufacturing capacity, or detailed factory certifications beyond verified supplier status. Therefore, it fits best within the “small-to-medium but operationally capable” range.

Final Score
14 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 5 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / platform tags: “Response time ≤1h”, “On-time delivery 100.0%”
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has several important platform credibility signals, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status. A 5-year Gold Supplier history provides a moderate track record on the platform. The available tags also support service and delivery transparency, although no independent product certifications or industry-specific compliance certificates are provided in the data.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has the core platform credibility elements expected from a reliable vendor: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verification. The 5-year duration is reasonably established, though not long enough to place it in the highest credibility tier. Because certification details are limited to platform/service tags and no external compliance certificates are listed, the score remains strong but not maximum.

Final Score
17 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 10+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥33.8K+
- Store rating: 4.9
- Reviews: 3

Elaboration
The supplier shows active platform transactions, but the order count and transaction amount are relatively limited. A 4.9 rating is positive, yet the review base of only 3 reviews is too small to provide broad commercial validation. The available business data suggests some buyer acceptance, but not yet strong evidence of high-volume or high-frequency procurement activity.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has confirmed recent orders and transaction value, which is better than an unproven profile. However, 10+ orders and CN¥33.8K+ over six months indicate relatively low commercial volume. The high rating improves confidence, but the very limited review count reduces statistical reliability. This places the supplier in the lower-to-mid business performance range.

Final Score
12 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤1h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier demonstrates strong responsiveness, with a response time of one hour or less. This is a positive signal for sourcing communication, quotation follow-up, and early-stage procurement coordination. However, the provided data does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization, OEM/ODM services, engineering customization, packaging customization, or design adaptation.

Scoring Rationale
The fast response time supports a strong service score, but customization capability cannot be confirmed from the provided data. Since the scoring criteria require both response efficiency and customization capability, the absence of customization evidence prevents a top-tier score.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is the strongest available indicator in this dimension. This suggests reliable fulfillment performance for the recorded transactions on the platform.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the reported rate is 100.0%, the supplier earns the maximum score for this dimension. The score is based strictly on the provided on-time delivery metric.

Final Score
10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.9
- Reviews: 3
- Verified supplier / Factory Verification: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The store rating of 4.9 indicates positive customer satisfaction among the available reviewers. However, only 3 reviews are listed, which is a very small sample size and limits confidence in long-term quality consistency. The supplier is verified, which supports baseline trust, but the data does not confirm Finished Product Inspection or other quality control systems.

Scoring Rationale
The high rating is favorable, and verified supplier status adds some quality-related credibility. However, the low number of reviews and lack of confirmed finished product inspection prevent a higher score. The available quality evidence is positive but not comprehensive enough to classify the supplier as having a fully validated quality assurance system.

Final Score
13 / 20

Total Score

73 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Yangzhou Xuancheng Filter Screen Co., Ltd. is recommended for cautious cooperation, especially for buyers seeking filter mesh, woven wire cloth, stainless steel mesh, and related filtration screen products in small-to-medium procurement volumes. The supplier shows good platform credibility, fast response capability, verified status, Trade Assurance support, and excellent reported delivery performance.

The main risks are the limited recent transaction scale, low review count, and insufficient data regarding Full Customization, Finished Product Inspection, and detailed quality certifications. For larger-volume or specification-critical procurement, buyers should request product samples, technical specifications, quality inspection procedures, and any available factory or product certification documents before placing bulk orders.

Overall, the supplier has solid growth potential as a responsive and delivery-reliable mesh/filter supplier, but further validation is needed before strategic or high-volume sourcing.