Jiangxi Sange Filter Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Jiangxi Sange Filter Manufacturing Co., Ltd. is a China-based filter manufacturer located in Jiangxi Province, with a reported factory area of over 15,000 m2 and more than 80 staff. The supplier offers air oil separators, air compressor pre-filters, screw compressor oil filters, and high-efficiency air filters, with low minimum order quantities ranging from 1 to 10 pieces across the listed products. Its profile shows Gold Supplier status for 1 year, Trade Assurance support, supplier audit status, and platform labels including Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, Minor Customization, and Warranty Available. Commercial activity is moderate, with 30+ orders and CN¥540.9K+ transaction value over the past six months. The store rating is 4.7, but the review base is limited to 4 reviews. Overall, this supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking flexible MOQ, mid-scale filter sourcing, and customization support, while larger buyers should further verify production consistency and quality history before committing to high-volume procurement.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
The supplier reports a factory area of 15,000+ m2, 80+ staff, and audited supplier status marked as True. The company is located in Jiangxi Province, China.

Elaboration:
The factory size indicates a meaningful physical production base rather than a very small workshop. An employee base of over 80 staff suggests the supplier has basic organizational and production capacity to support recurring orders. The audited supplier status adds credibility to the existence and operational profile of the company, although the provided data does not include detailed audit scope, production line count, machinery list, annual output, or capacity utilization.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier fits the profile of a medium-sized stable factory. Its factory area is relatively solid, and the staff count supports basic to moderate production capability. However, the data does not show large-scale workforce size, detailed production capacity, major factory certifications, or verified annual output, so it should not be scored as a large-scale supply chain operator.

Final Score: 16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
The supplier is listed as an Gold Supplier for 1 year, supports Trade Assurance, and has platform labels including Warranty Available, Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, and Minor Customization. Audited supplier status is marked as True.

Elaboration:
Trade Assurance and Gold Supplier status provide a baseline level of platform-backed transaction credibility. The presence of Finished Product Inspection and customization-related labels improves the supplier’s compliance and service profile. However, the Gold Supplier history is only 1 year, which limits the demonstrated duration of platform credibility. No additional third-party management system certifications, such as ISO or sector-specific certificates, are provided in the data.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has several core credibility indicators, including Trade Assurance and an audited supplier flag. This supports a positive compliance view. The short Gold Supplier tenure and lack of detailed certification documentation prevent a higher score. The profile is credible but still relatively early-stage from a platform history perspective.

Final Score: 15 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
Over the past six months, the supplier recorded 30+ orders and CN¥540.9K+ in transaction value. The store rating is 4.7, based on 4 reviews.

Elaboration:
The six-month transaction value shows that the supplier has achieved actual commercial activity on the platform. The order count of 30+ indicates repeated buyer engagement, but it is not high-volume when compared with suppliers showing hundreds or thousands of recent orders. The 4.7 rating is positive, but the review count is very limited, which weakens the reliability of the rating as a broad customer satisfaction indicator.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier demonstrates moderate commercial validation, especially through the CN¥540.9K+ transaction value. However, the relatively low order count and very small number of reviews mean the business performance is not yet strongly proven at scale. The score reflects stable but still developing platform transaction performance.

Final Score: 15 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
The reported communication response time is ≤2h. Platform labels include Full Customization and Minor Customization.

Elaboration:
A response time within two hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency for sourcing inquiries and order discussions. The presence of both Full Customization and Minor Customization suggests the supplier can support customized requirements, which may be useful for buyers needing filter specifications, packaging, or product adaptations. However, the data does not provide details on engineering support, sampling lead time, dedicated account management, or multilingual support.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier shows good service capability because it responds within a reasonable time and supports customization. Since the response time is not stated as ≤1h, and detailed service process data is insufficient, it does not reach the highest service score band.

Final Score: 8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is 95.5%.

Elaboration:
A 95.5% on-time delivery rate is a strong logistics performance indicator. It suggests that the supplier has generally reliable fulfillment discipline for platform orders. This is especially relevant for buyers sourcing maintenance or replacement filter products where delivery delays can affect equipment operation schedules.

Scoring Rationale:
According to the scoring framework, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 point range. At 95.5%, the supplier deserves a high delivery score. The score is not reduced significantly because the available metric is clear and directly aligned with the evaluation standard.

Final Score: 10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
The store rating is 4.7, with 4 reviews. The supplier has a Finished Product Inspection label and audited supplier status marked as True.

Elaboration:
The 4.7 rating is favorable, indicating positive customer feedback from the available review base. Finished Product Inspection is an important quality-control signal because it suggests inspection is performed before shipment. The audited supplier status also supports a basic level of supplier verification. However, the review count is only 4, which is too limited to fully validate long-term quality consistency. No detailed defect rate, inspection report, product test standard, or formal quality certification is provided.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has a good rating and some quality assurance indicators, but the limited number of reviews creates uncertainty. Finished Product Inspection supports a stronger quality profile than suppliers with no inspection label, yet the lack of broader customer feedback and detailed quality documentation prevents a top-tier score.

Final Score: 15 / 20

Total Score

Company Strength: 16 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility: 15 / 20
Business Performance: 15 / 20
Service Capability: 8 / 10
Delivery Performance: 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback: 15 / 20

Total Score: 79 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommended with controlled initial cooperation.

Jiangxi Sange Filter Manufacturing Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking air compressor filters, air oil separators, oil filters, and air filters with flexible MOQ and customization options. The supplier appears appropriate for small to medium-volume importers, maintenance product distributors, aftermarket filter buyers, and buyers who want to test products before scaling up.

Key risk points include the short 1-year Gold Supplier history, only 4 customer reviews, and insufficient data on formal factory certifications, detailed production capacity, product testing standards, and long-term quality consistency. For larger or quality-sensitive procurement programs, buyers should request samples, inspection reports, production capability documentation, and order-specific quality requirements before placing bulk orders.

Growth potential is present due to the supplier’s factory size, audited supplier status, customization labels, strong on-time delivery rate, and moderate recent transaction value. If future review volume and certification transparency improve, the supplier’s procurement attractiveness could increase further.