zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Hainan Hongbao Printing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Supplier Evaluation Report: Hainan Hongbao Printing Technology Co., Ltd.

Hainan Hongbao Printing Technology Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Hainan Hongbao Printing Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based packaging supplier located in Hainan, mainly offering customized paper bags, food packaging bags, apparel packaging bags, recyclable carrier bags, and related paper packaging products. Based on the provided data, the supplier demonstrates strong platform credibility with 5 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and a reported 100.0% on-time delivery rate. Its recent business performance is also solid, with 500+ orders and CN¥3.7M+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.8 store rating and 80+ reviews.

However, the company’s production scale appears relatively limited in terms of staffing, with only 10+ staff, despite a factory area of 4,500+㎡. Quality assurance data is partially incomplete, especially regarding Finished Product Inspection. This supplier is suitable for buyers seeking paper packaging with low MOQ customization and stable platform-backed transactions, but larger buyers should further verify production capacity and quality control processes before placing high-volume orders.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Factory location: Hainan, China
  • Factory area: 4,500+㎡
  • Number of staff: 10+ staff
  • Verified supplier / factory audit status: True
  • Main product scope: custom paper bags, food packaging bags, apparel packaging bags, recyclable carrier bags

Elaboration

The supplier has a documented factory area of over 4,500㎡, which indicates a certain level of physical production space suitable for paper packaging manufacturing and order handling. The product range focuses on paper-based packaging, including luxury paper bags, takeaway food packaging bags, apparel packaging bags, and recyclable carrier bags. This suggests a relatively focused product category rather than a highly diversified manufacturing profile.

However, the reported staffing level of only 10+ employees is relatively small when compared with the factory area. This may indicate a lean operation, partial outsourcing, semi-automated production, or limited internal production manpower, but the provided data does not allow further confirmation. The verified supplier status adds credibility, but there is no detailed information on production lines, monthly output, machinery, or factory certifications.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows basic-to-moderate production capability due to its 4,500+㎡ facility and verified supplier status. However, the small reported workforce limits confidence in large-scale production stability. Since no detailed production capacity, machinery list, or factory certification information is provided, it cannot be classified as a large-scale stable supply chain. It fits better into the category of a small-to-medium factory with basic production capability and some verification support.

Final Score

13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 5 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier / factory audit status: True
  • Certification / platform labels:
  • Warranty available
  • Low MOQ for customization
  • On-time delivery 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier has a relatively strong platform credibility profile. A 5-year Gold Supplier history indicates sustained platform participation rather than a newly established storefront. Trade Assurance support provides an additional transaction protection mechanism for buyers, especially for payment security and order fulfillment confidence.

The supplier is also marked as a verified supplier, which strengthens its credibility compared with unverified sellers. The available platform labels indicate warranty support, low MOQ customization, and strong delivery performance. However, the provided data does not include specific third-party product certifications, ISO certification, environmental certifications, food-contact packaging certifications, or detailed audit reports.

Scoring Rationale

The combination of 5-year Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, and platform labels forms a strong credibility foundation. While the supplier does not have enough provided evidence to confirm a fully comprehensive compliance certification system, the core platform trust indicators are complete and mature. Therefore, the score is placed in the high range, but not at the maximum level due to missing detailed certification documentation.

Final Score

18 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 500+
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥3.7M+
  • Store rating: 4.8
  • Number of reviews: 80+

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates strong recent commercial activity. More than 500 orders in the past six months indicates active transaction flow and a relatively high level of buyer engagement. A transaction value exceeding CN¥3.7M over the same period further confirms that the supplier has meaningful sales volume, rather than only small or occasional transactions.

The store rating of 4.8 is positive and indicates generally satisfactory customer experience. The review count of 80+ provides a reasonable feedback base, although it is not extremely large. Overall, the supplier’s commercial performance appears well-supported by actual platform transaction data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier meets the profile of a high-performing seller based on recent order count, transaction value, and store rating. The 500+ orders and CN¥3.7M+ transaction value in six months represent strong business validation. The 4.8 rating further supports positive market acceptance. The only reason the score is not full is that the review volume, while useful, is moderate rather than extensive.

Final Score

18 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤2h
  • Customization-related label: Low MOQ for customization
  • Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of within 2 hours is a positive service indicator and suggests relatively efficient communication. For procurement buyers, especially those handling customized packaging, timely communication is important for confirming artwork, materials, sizing, printing requirements, and delivery arrangements.

The platform label states “Low MOQ for customization,” which indicates that the supplier supports some level of customization at relatively accessible order quantities. However, the provided data does not explicitly confirm Full Customization capability. There is also no detailed information on design support, sample lead time, packaging engineering support, or dedicated account management.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates good basic service capability due to its ≤2h response time and customization-related label. However, because the response time is not within ≤1 hour and Full Customization is not explicitly confirmed, it does not qualify for the highest service score range. The supplier is suitable for standard or moderately customized paper packaging inquiries, but buyers requiring complex customization should further confirm capabilities.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is a strong indicator of delivery reliability. For packaging procurement, delivery consistency is critical because packaging delays can directly affect downstream product fulfillment, retail launches, and promotional schedules.

The same 100.0% on-time delivery information is also included in the platform certification/label data, reinforcing its visibility as a key supplier performance indicator. However, the provided data does not include shipment volume breakdown, average lead time, or historical delivery performance across longer periods.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the provided on-time delivery rate is 100.0%, the supplier receives the maximum score for this dimension. The lack of additional delivery details does not reduce the score because the required delivery metric is clearly provided and is at the highest level.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.8
  • Number of reviews: 80+
  • Verified supplier / factory audit status: True
  • Warranty available: Yes, according to platform label
  • Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
  • Factory Verification: True / verified supplier status provided

Elaboration

The supplier has a positive customer feedback profile, with a 4.8 store rating and 80+ reviews. This indicates that buyers have generally had satisfactory experiences, and the review volume provides a reasonable but not extensive basis for evaluation. The verified supplier status also contributes positively to quality confidence, as it indicates some level of supplier verification.

The “Warranty available” label provides additional buyer reassurance. However, the provided data does not confirm whether the supplier has Finished Product Inspection procedures, internal QC checkpoints, third-party inspection acceptance, or formal quality management certifications. For paper packaging, these details are important because quality consistency may involve printing accuracy, color consistency, paper thickness, handle strength, glue bonding, and packaging durability. Since these details are not provided, they must be treated as Insufficient Data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has good customer feedback and basic quality credibility through its 4.8 rating, 80+ reviews, warranty label, and verified supplier status. However, the absence of confirmed Finished Product Inspection and detailed quality control documentation prevents the supplier from being rated in the top quality tier. The quality profile is favorable but not fully validated.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 13 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 18 / 20
Business Performance 18 / 20
Service Capability 8 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 16 / 20
Total Score 83 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for cooperation with verification controls.

Hainan Hongbao Printing Technology Co., Ltd. is a suitable supplier for buyers sourcing customized paper packaging products, including paper shopping bags, food packaging bags, apparel packaging bags, and recyclable carrier bags. The supplier is especially suitable for small to medium-sized buyers, e-commerce brands, apparel brands, retail packaging buyers, and customers requiring low MOQ customization.

The main strengths are its strong platform credibility, 5-year Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, 500+ recent orders, CN¥3.7M+ six-month transaction value, 4.8 rating, and 100.0% on-time delivery rate. These indicators show good commercial validation and transaction reliability.

Key risks include the relatively small reported workforce of 10+ staff, insufficient data on production capacity, and lack of confirmed Finished Product Inspection or formal quality management certification. For large-volume or highly customized orders, buyers should request factory audit details, production line information, QC procedures, pre-shipment inspection options, and sample confirmation before mass production.

Overall, the supplier shows strong growth potential in customized paper packaging, provided that buyers apply appropriate quality verification and capacity confirmation before scaling orders.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Huamo Environmental Protection Technology (Hainan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huamo Environmental Protection Technology (Hainan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hainan Yiyuantang Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hainan Yiyuantang Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Hongbao Automobile Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Hongbao Automobile Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huiatech Printing Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Huiatech Printing Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Juncheng Printing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Juncheng Printing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Hitek Printing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Hitek Printing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Meilihua Printing Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Meilihua Printing Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai National Resources & Jingjie Printing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai National Resources & Jingjie Printing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhongtai Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhongtai Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Minghong Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Minghong Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Licai Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Licai Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Kuaima Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Kuaima Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanning Fangda Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanning Fangda Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yuanming Printing (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yuanming Printing (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Jinguan Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Jinguan Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Shunhong Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Shunhong Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sinice Digital Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sinice Digital Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jorunns Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jorunns Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Guangyuanda Printing And Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Guangyuanda Printing And Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hengshui Chiyue Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hengshui Chiyue Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Jiangxi Jinghao Import And Export Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Jinghao Import And Export Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fangyuan Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fangyuan Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Qida Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Qida Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Haifei Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Haifei Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Chiyang Scent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Chiyang Scent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dali Automobile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dali Automobile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Xudong Mechanical Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Xudong Mechanical Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Rofee Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Rofee Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Vscam Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Vscam Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Yueling Building Materials Limited Supplier Evaluation
Yueling Building Materials Limited Supplier Evaluation
Henan Yuantong Heavy Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Yuantong Heavy Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Changcheng Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Changcheng Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xicheng Ep (Cn) Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Xicheng Ep (Cn) Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Henan Yinxing Industrial Boiler Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Yinxing Industrial Boiler Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Gifts Plastic Hardware Crafts Factory Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Gifts Plastic Hardware Crafts Factory Supplier Evaluation
Tata Steel (Tianjin) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tata Steel (Tianjin) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sun Rise Exact Industrial Company. Supplier Evaluation
Sun Rise Exact Industrial Company. Supplier Evaluation
Guanxian Yuhui Electrical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guanxian Yuhui Electrical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Lehman Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Lehman Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Bcd Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Bcd Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026