zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Nanning Fangda Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Nanning Fangda Printing Co., Ltd. is a China-based printing supplier located in Guangxi, with a reported factory area of 4,000+ m² and 50+ staff. The supplier shows a solid platform credibility profile, including 6 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and listed capability tags such as low MOQ customization, OEM for well-known brands, and finished product inspection. Its recent commercial performance is strong, with 400+ orders and CN¥2.5M+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.9 store rating and 100+ reviews. Delivery performance is also favorable, with a 91.6% on-time shipment rate. Based on the available data, this supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking custom printed products, low-to-medium MOQ sourcing, and suppliers with proven marketplace transaction history. Key limitations include insufficient data on formal factory certifications and full customization capability.

Nanning Fangda Printing Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

  • Factory location: Guangxi, China
  • Factory area: 4,000+ m²
  • Employees: 50+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Factory certification: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a defined physical production base with 4,000+ m² of factory space and more than 50 employees. This indicates an established operating facility rather than a very small trading setup. The staff size and factory area suggest the company can support regular production activities for printed products, especially for orders with MOQs ranging from 100 to 500 pieces based on the provided product listings.

The verified supplier status strengthens confidence in its operational legitimacy. However, the data does not provide specific factory audit details, ISO certification, social compliance certification, or other formal manufacturing certifications. Therefore, while the company shows stable production capability, its factory strength cannot be assessed as a large-scale or highly certified manufacturing base.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier fits the profile of a small-to-medium stable factory. Its 4,000+ m² facility and 50+ staff indicate meaningful production capacity, and verified supplier status adds credibility. However, the absence of detailed factory certification data limits the score from reaching the highest range. It is stronger than a basic small workshop but does not have enough evidence to be classified as a large-scale, fully certified supply chain.

Final Score

15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 6 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Certification / industry tags: Low MOQ for customization, OEM for well-known brands, Finished product inspection

Elaboration

The supplier has a relatively strong platform profile. Six years as a Gold Supplier indicates a multi-year presence on the platform, which is stronger than a newly listed supplier. Trade Assurance support provides additional transaction protection for buyers, while verified supplier status improves basic trustworthiness.

The listed platform tags also support credibility, especially Finished product inspection and Low MOQ for customization. The OEM for well-known brands tag is provided in the data, but no specific brand names or customer references are available, so it should be treated only as a platform capability label rather than verified customer evidence.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has core platform credibility elements: Gold Supplier status, 6-year platform history, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status. These factors place it in the high credibility range. The score is not at the absolute maximum because detailed third-party compliance certificates, factory audit documents, or named certifications are not provided.

Final Score

18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

  • Orders in past 6 months: 400+
  • Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥2.5M+
  • Store rating: 4.9
  • Reviews: 100+

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates strong recent marketplace performance. More than 400 orders in six months indicates active buyer demand and repeated transaction flow. CN¥2.5M+ in transaction value over the same period suggests that the business is not only receiving small sample orders but also achieving meaningful commercial volume.

The 4.9 store rating and 100+ reviews provide additional validation from past buyers. The combination of high order count, substantial transaction value, strong rating, and a meaningful review base indicates a commercially proven supplier on the platform.

Scoring Rationale

This is one of the supplier’s strongest dimensions. The past six-month order volume and transaction value are both strong, and the 4.9 rating with 100+ reviews supports positive customer validation. The score is slightly below perfect because the data does not include repeat buyer ratio, complaint rate, refund rate, or category-specific sales breakdown.

Final Score

19 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤1h
  • Low MOQ for customization: Listed as platform tag
  • Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier shows strong responsiveness, with a reported response time of one hour or less. This is positive for buyers who need quick quotation handling, artwork confirmation, sampling communication, or order status updates.

The supplier is tagged for low MOQ customization, which is relevant to printed products and supports buyers with smaller custom order requirements. However, the data does not explicitly confirm Full Customization capability. Therefore, customization capability can be recognized at a basic or moderate level, but not as a fully verified advanced customization service.

Scoring Rationale

The response time meets the highest service benchmark. However, because Full Customization is not confirmed, the supplier cannot receive a top score in this dimension. The available data supports good communication efficiency and some customization flexibility, but the depth of design, material, packaging, or end-to-end custom development support remains insufficiently documented.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

  • On-time shipment rate: 91.6%

Elaboration

The supplier’s reported on-time shipment rate is above 90%, which indicates generally reliable delivery execution. For custom printed products, delivery performance is especially important because production often depends on artwork confirmation, printing setup, finishing, and packing.

A 91.6% rate suggests that the supplier can manage most orders within expected timelines. However, there remains some delivery risk, especially for urgent orders or orders requiring complex customization.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time shipment rate above 90% falls within the 9–10 point range. The supplier qualifies for a high score in this category, though not a perfect score because the rate is close to the lower end of the 90%+ band rather than near full reliability.

Final Score

9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.9
  • Reviews: 100+
  • Finished product inspection: Listed
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Factory Verification: True, based on provided verified supplier field
  • Detailed quality certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong customer feedback profile, with a 4.9 rating and 100+ reviews. This indicates generally positive buyer satisfaction and enough review volume to provide meaningful marketplace feedback.

The Finished product inspection tag is particularly relevant for printed products, where quality checks may involve color accuracy, finishing, cutting, binding, embossing, and packaging condition. Verified supplier status also adds a basic level of quality and operational credibility. However, no detailed inspection process, defect rate, quality control standard, or third-party quality certification is provided.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier earns a high score due to strong rating performance, sufficient review quantity, finished product inspection, and verified supplier status. The score is not perfect because the data does not include formal quality certifications, inspection reports, AQL standards, or detailed defect performance.

Final Score

18 / 20

Total Score

87 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Nanning Fangda Printing Co., Ltd. is recommended for cooperation, especially for buyers seeking custom printed products, low MOQ printing orders, promotional print materials, booklets, leaflets, drawing printing, or film prop-style printed items based strictly on the provided product listings.

The supplier is most suitable for: - Small to medium-sized buyers requiring flexible MOQ from 100 to 500 pieces - Buyers prioritizing transaction protection through Trade Assurance - Customers needing responsive communication and stable marketplace performance - Procurement teams seeking suppliers with proven recent order volume and positive review history

Main risks: - Insufficient data on formal factory certifications - Full Customization capability is not explicitly confirmed - No detailed quality control standard, defect rate, or third-party inspection report provided - OEM for well-known brands is listed only as a platform tag, with no specific customer evidence provided

Growth potential appears positive based on strong six-month transaction activity, 400+ recent orders, CN¥2.5M+ transaction value, 4.9 rating, and 91.6% on-time shipment rate. For larger or compliance-sensitive procurement programs, buyers should request factory audit documents, sample approval records, production lead time confirmation, and quality inspection procedures before placing bulk orders.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Henan Fangda Industrial Corporation Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Fangda Industrial Corporation Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhongtai Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhongtai Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Minghong Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Minghong Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Licai Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Licai Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Kuaima Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Kuaima Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yuanming Printing (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yuanming Printing (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Jinguan Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Jinguan Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Shunhong Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Shunhong Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sinice Digital Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sinice Digital Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jorunns Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jorunns Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huiatech Printing Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Huiatech Printing Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Guangyuanda Printing And Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Guangyuanda Printing And Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xingkaihua Printing Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xingkaihua Printing Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hainan Hongbao Printing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hainan Hongbao Printing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Galant Package Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Galant Package Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinjiang Sanyao Packaging Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinjiang Sanyao Packaging Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Xinhui Printing Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Xinhui Printing Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Tongjie Printing Production Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Tongjie Printing Production Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Juncheng Printing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Juncheng Printing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Everich Commerce Group Limited Supplier Evaluation
Everich Commerce Group Limited Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Chaozhou Daxin Shoes Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chaozhou Daxin Shoes Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Changcheng Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Changcheng Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangxi Yongjiang Food Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangxi Yongjiang Food Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Xingye Shengda Construction Engineering Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Xingye Shengda Construction Engineering Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Fairir Biotech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Fairir Biotech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hinchytek Optoelectronics (Shanghai) Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hinchytek Optoelectronics (Shanghai) Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Pujiang County Xiaoyan Handicraft Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Pujiang County Xiaoyan Handicraft Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Mingxin Metallurgy Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Mingxin Metallurgy Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Delong Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Delong Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Huangchuang Smart Household Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Huangchuang Smart Household Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongying Sunstar Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongying Sunstar Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xuanjing Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xuanjing Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beton Nutrition Corporation Supplier Evaluation
Beton Nutrition Corporation Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Jinsheng Gold Leaf Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Jinsheng Gold Leaf Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Bafinasa Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Bafinasa Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping Shanggang Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping Shanggang Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Linyi Luozhuang Tongtai Building Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Linyi Luozhuang Tongtai Building Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinan Yidiao Cnc Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinan Yidiao Cnc Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangyin Yfy Chemical & Plastics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangyin Yfy Chemical & Plastics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin New Rising Rubber And Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin New Rising Rubber And Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026