Anping Shanggang Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Anping Shanggang Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. is a China-based wire mesh supplier located in Hebei, with a reported factory area of over 8,000㎡ and more than 100 staff. Its listed products cover PVC-coated bird protection mesh, perforated screen mesh, stainless steel wire mesh, and woven stainless steel wire mesh, indicating a focused wire mesh product portfolio with both standard and custom-related offerings. The supplier is listed as a Gold Supplier for 1 year and marked as a verified supplier, with platform tags including low MOQ for customization, response time within 2 hours, and 100.0% on-time delivery. However, Trade Assurance is not supported, and business performance data is largely missing: no disclosed 6-month order volume, transaction value, store rating, or customer review record, with reviews shown as 0. This supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking mid-scale wire mesh sourcing with relatively low MOQ flexibility, but it requires further due diligence before large-volume or high-risk procurement.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory area: 8,000+㎡
- Employees: 100+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Location: Hebei, China

Elaboration
The supplier has a measurable physical production base and a staff size above 100, which suggests a moderate operating scale rather than a very small trading operation. The 8,000+㎡ factory area supports the view that the company has basic manufacturing or production-handling capacity for wire mesh products. The verified supplier status also provides some platform-level confirmation of company existence or supplier profile credibility.

Scoring Rationale
The company does not reach the level of a large-scale, highly proven supply chain because the data does not include annual capacity, production lines, machinery count, export scale, or factory audit details. However, the combination of factory area, employee size, and verified supplier status supports classification as a medium-sized stable supplier with basic production capability.

Final Score
16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 1 year
- Trade Assurance: False
- Certification / industry tags: Low MOQ for customization, Response time ≤2h, On-time delivery 100.0%
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has basic platform credibility through Gold Supplier status and supplier verification. The listed platform tags provide additional operational indicators, particularly around response time and delivery performance. However, the Gold Supplier history is short at only 1 year, and the lack of Trade Assurance reduces transaction protection for buyers.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has some credibility signals but not a complete platform compliance structure. A 1-year Gold Supplier record is relatively early-stage, and the absence of Trade Assurance is a meaningful limitation for procurement risk control. The available verification and tags prevent the score from being low, but the platform backing is not strong enough for a high credibility rating.

Final Score
12 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Past 6-month order volume: Insufficient Data
- Past 6-month transaction value: Insufficient Data
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0

Elaboration
The available data does not provide evidence of recent transaction volume, transaction value, or buyer satisfaction through store rating. The review count is listed as 0, meaning there is no visible customer feedback base to validate actual order execution or buyer experience.

Scoring Rationale
Because no order volume, transaction amount, or store rating is disclosed, the supplier’s commercial performance cannot be strongly validated. The absence of reviews further limits confidence in market acceptance. The score is therefore low, not because negative performance is proven, but because commercial proof is insufficient.

Final Score
6 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤2h
- Customization-related tag: Low MOQ for customization
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier shows a relatively responsive communication profile, with response time within 2 hours. The “Low MOQ for customization” tag suggests some customization flexibility, especially for buyers requiring smaller customized orders. However, there is no explicit data confirming Full Customization capability.

Scoring Rationale
A response time within 2 hours is positive but does not meet the strongest benchmark of response within 1 hour. Customization capability appears present at a basic level through the low MOQ customization tag, but the absence of Full Customization confirmation prevents a higher score.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is the strongest delivery indicator available in the provided data. This suggests that, within the measured platform record, the supplier has maintained punctual shipment performance.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the reported rate is 100.0%, the supplier receives the maximum score for this dimension. This score is based only on the provided delivery metric and does not include unsupported assumptions about logistics capacity.

Final Score
10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory / supplier verification: True

Elaboration
The supplier has verification status, which provides some quality-related credibility at the company profile level. However, there is no disclosed store rating, no customer reviews, and no data confirming Finished Product Inspection. Therefore, quality performance cannot be fully validated through either buyer feedback or inspection-system evidence.

Scoring Rationale
The verified supplier status supports a basic level of confidence, but the lack of customer feedback and absence of disclosed inspection information are significant limitations. With 0 reviews and no store rating, the supplier does not have enough visible quality validation to support a medium-high score.

Final Score
11 / 20

Total Score

62 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation can be considered with caution, especially for buyers sourcing wire mesh products in small to medium volumes or requiring low-MOQ customization. The supplier shows moderate company strength, verified supplier status, responsive communication, and excellent reported on-time delivery. However, the main risks are limited platform history, no Trade Assurance, missing transaction data, no store rating, 0 reviews, and insufficient evidence of finished product inspection. It is recommended to request samples, confirm production and inspection procedures, verify payment protection options, and conduct additional supplier checks before placing large or critical orders. The supplier has growth potential if it builds stronger transaction records, customer feedback, and quality assurance documentation.