Anhui Koyo Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Anhui Koyo Machinery Co., Ltd. is a China-based machinery supplier located in Anhui, with a reported factory area of 1,200+ m² and verified supplier status. Its listed products are mainly automatic liquid, water, juice carton, and sachet water-related machinery, with MOQ generally at 1 set, indicating suitability for buyers seeking small-batch equipment procurement or project-based machinery purchases. The supplier shows strong platform credibility, supported by 11 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, Finished Product Inspection, ODM service availability, Full Customization, and supplier verification. However, its business performance data is relatively limited, with only 10+ orders and CN¥67.6K+ transaction value in the past six months. Customer feedback is also limited, with a 4.5 store rating based on only 2 reviews. The most significant concern is delivery performance, with an on-time dispatch rate of 60.0%, which requires careful risk control before placing time-sensitive orders.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Company name: Anhui Koyo Machinery Co., Ltd.
• Country/region: China, Anhui Province
• Factory area: 1,200+ m²
• Employee count: Insufficient Data
• Verified supplier / factory audit status: True
• Product scope includes automatic liquid machinery, water plant machinery, juice carton machinery, pure water machine, and sachet water machinery.

Elaboration

The supplier has a disclosed factory area of 1,200+ m², which suggests a relatively small-scale manufacturing base rather than a large industrial production facility. The company lists multiple machinery-related products, mostly sold with MOQ of 1 set, which is consistent with equipment-based manufacturing and project-oriented sales rather than high-volume consumer goods supply.

However, the absence of employee count limits the ability to fully evaluate production manpower, engineering depth, assembly capacity, or after-sales support scale. The verified supplier status provides some positive support, indicating that the supplier has passed a platform-level verification or audit process. Still, without employee data, annual capacity, production line quantity, equipment list, or export market data, the company’s production strength cannot be assessed as large-scale.

Scoring Rationale

The company has a verifiable operating base and factory area information, but 1,200+ m² is more consistent with a small to lower-mid-sized machinery supplier. Verified supplier status improves confidence, but the missing employee count and lack of detailed production capacity data prevent a higher score. The supplier appears capable of basic machinery production and order fulfillment, but the available data does not support classification as a large-scale stable supply chain.

Final Score

11 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 11 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier / factory audit status: True
• Certification / platform tags:
• Finished product inspection
• ODM service available
• Full customization
• Response time ≤5h

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates strong platform credibility. An 11-year Gold Supplier history is a meaningful indicator of long-term platform presence. Trade Assurance availability also adds transactional protection for buyers, especially for machinery orders where prepayment, customization, and delivery timing can be significant procurement concerns.

The verified supplier status further supports credibility, while the presence of Finished Product Inspection indicates that some level of quality control process is disclosed. ODM service and Full Customization tags also show that the supplier positions itself as a customized machinery solution provider rather than only a standard equipment reseller.

Scoring Rationale

This is the supplier’s strongest dimension. The combination of 11 years Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, and multiple platform tags forms a relatively complete credibility profile. The only reason the score is not full is that the provided data does not include details of specific third-party certifications, ISO certificates, CE certificates, audited reports, or certification validity documents. Based strictly on the available platform data, credibility is high.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: 10+
• Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥67.6K+
• Store rating: 4.5
• Number of reviews: 2

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded transaction activity in the past six months, but the scale is limited. 10+ orders and CN¥67.6K+ transaction value indicate that the supplier has commercial activity, but not at a high-volume or high-value level based on the provided data.

For machinery suppliers, order numbers may naturally be lower than commodity suppliers because equipment purchases are typically higher-value and project-based. However, the reported transaction amount of CN¥67.6K+ is not particularly high for machinery products, especially considering that some listed products are priced from around CN¥10,480.02 to CN¥202,839 per set.

The store rating of 4.5 is acceptable, but the credibility of this rating is limited by the very small review count of only 2.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has some recent transaction history, which supports basic commercial validation. However, both order volume and transaction value are modest, and the very small number of reviews weakens the reliability of the store rating. This dimension should therefore be evaluated as low-to-moderate rather than strong. The data supports that the supplier is active, but not that it has high market traction or broad customer validation.

Final Score

11 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤5h
• Full Customization: Available
• ODM service: Available
• Response time tag: ≤5h

Elaboration

The supplier provides response time information of ≤5 hours, which is acceptable for international B2B communication but not at the strongest level. The availability of Full Customization and ODM service is positive, particularly for machinery procurement where buyers may require adjustments to capacity, packaging format, liquid type, automation level, or production line configuration.

However, the data does not include detailed after-sales service terms, installation support, spare parts availability, overseas service engineers, warranty period, technical documentation, or language support. Therefore, service capability can be recognized as commercially functional, but not fully proven at an advanced level.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier meets the criteria for normal response efficiency and shows customization capability. Since the response time is ≤5h rather than ≤1h, it does not qualify for the highest service score range. Full Customization and ODM availability justify an upper score within the mid-range, but missing after-sales and technical support data prevents a 9–10 score.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time dispatch rate: 60.0%

Elaboration

The supplier’s reported on-time dispatch rate is 60.0%, which is a significant concern. For machinery procurement, delivery reliability is especially important because equipment delays can affect factory installation schedules, production launch timelines, downstream packaging plans, and buyer project deadlines.

A 60.0% on-time dispatch rate means that, based on the available platform data, the supplier has a relatively weak recent delivery performance. This does not necessarily mean every order will be delayed, but it indicates that buyers should not treat delivery commitments as low-risk without additional confirmation.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time dispatch rate below 70% should receive below 5 points. At 60.0%, the supplier falls clearly into the weak delivery performance category. This is the most material operational risk shown in the provided data.

Final Score

4 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Store rating: 4.5
• Number of reviews: 2
• Finished Product Inspection: Available
• Verified supplier / factory audit status: True
• Trade Assurance: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a 4.5 store rating, which is generally positive. However, the rating is based on only 2 reviews, which is too limited to provide strong statistical confidence. Customer feedback volume is therefore insufficient to prove consistent quality performance across a broad buyer base.

On the quality assurance side, the supplier has a Finished Product Inspection tag and verified supplier status. These are positive indicators because they suggest some level of inspection and platform verification. Trade Assurance also adds transaction-level protection. However, the provided data does not include detailed quality control procedures, inspection reports, defect rates, certification documents, warranty claims, or customer complaint history.

Scoring Rationale

The score reflects a mixed profile: quality-related platform tags are present, and the store rating is acceptable, but the customer feedback base is very small. The supplier has basic quality assurance indicators, but there is not enough customer validation to rate it as highly reliable. The score is placed at the lower end of the “good rating with basic quality control” range.

Final Score

14 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional Cooperation Recommended

Anhui Koyo Machinery Co., Ltd. may be considered for cooperation, especially for buyers seeking machinery products with low MOQ requirements, customized equipment options, ODM service, and Trade Assurance protection. The supplier is more suitable for small to medium-sized buyers, pilot projects, first-time machinery sourcing, or buyers who can conduct detailed technical confirmation before purchase.

However, procurement should proceed with caution due to several risks:

1. Delivery risk: The on-time dispatch rate is only 60.0%, which is the key weakness. Buyers with strict project timelines should be cautious.
2. Limited commercial validation: Past six-month order volume and transaction value are modest.
3. Limited customer feedback: Only 2 reviews are available, so the 4.5 rating has limited reliability.
4. Incomplete company scale data: Employee count and detailed production capacity are not provided.

Before placing a substantial order, buyers should request production schedule confirmation, technical specifications, inspection standards, delivery milestones, warranty terms, and pre-shipment inspection arrangements. The supplier has growth potential due to its long presence, Trade Assurance, verified status, Finished Product Inspection, and customization capability, but its delivery performance must be closely managed.