Anhui Ankai Automobile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Executive Summary
Anhui Ankai Automobile Co., Ltd. is a China-based vehicle supplier located in Anhui, with disclosed factory capacity of 50,000+ sqm and 2,100+ staff. The supplier presents strong manufacturing scale and has been identified as a verified supplier. Its listed product portfolio focuses on city buses, electric buses, minibuses, and double-decker city buses, with several products showing a minimum order quantity of 1 unit. On -related credibility, the company has 9 years as a Gold Supplier and carries relevant tags such as Authorized Vehicle Exporter, Finished Product Inspection, ODM service available, and Full Customization. However, Trade Assurance is not supported, and commercial performance data is weak or missing: no disclosed six-month order volume, no transaction amount, no store rating, and 0 reviews. Overall, this supplier appears suitable for buyers prioritizing manufacturing scale and vehicle customization, but procurement decisions should include additional due diligence on recent transaction records, customer references, and quality documentation.
Detailed Analysis
- Company Strength
Basis
- Factory location: Anhui, China
- Factory area: 50,000+ sqm
- Employees: 2,100+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Product scope provided: electric city buses, minibuses, double-decker city buses, 8.5m buses
Elaboration
The supplier demonstrates a large disclosed production footprint and a substantial employee base. A factory area above 50,000 sqm and 2,100+ staff indicate industrial-scale production capability rather than a small trading operation. The verified supplier status further supports the credibility of its factory profile. The listed vehicle categories also suggest specialization in bus-related products, including electric and city bus models.
Scoring Rationale
The company fits the profile of a large-scale supplier based on factory size, staffing level, and verification status. While the data strongly supports production scale, the assessment cannot confirm actual annual output, production lines, installed capacity, or factory audit details beyond the provided verification status. Therefore, the score is high but not perfect.
Final Score
19 / 20
- Platform & Compliance Credibility
Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 9 years
- Trade Assurance: False
- Verification: verified supplier marked as True
- Certification / industry tags: Authorized vehicle exporter, Finished product inspection, ODM service available, Full customization
Elaboration
The supplier has maintained Gold Supplier status for 9 years, which is a positive indicator of platform presence and continuity. The “Authorized vehicle exporter” label is relevant to vehicle export procurement, and the presence of finished product inspection indicates some quality-control process at the product completion stage. ODM and full customization tags also add credibility for project-based or specification-driven procurement.
Scoring Rationale
The 9-year Gold Supplier history and verified supplier status provide meaningful platform credibility. However, the absence of Trade Assurance reduces transaction protection for buyers, especially for high-value vehicle purchases. The certification and service tags are useful, but the data does not provide third-party certification names, audit reports, or detailed compliance documents. This supports a strong but not top-tier score.
Final Score
17 / 20
- Business Performance
Basis
- Past 6-month order volume: Insufficient Data
- Past 6-month transaction amount: Insufficient Data
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0
Elaboration
The supplier’s business performance cannot be fully validated from the provided data. No recent order quantity or transaction value is disclosed, and no store rating is available. The review count is 0, meaning there is no visible customer feedback base in the provided dataset to support commercial activity, buyer satisfaction, or transaction consistency.
Scoring Rationale
Although the company has strong manufacturing indicators, the business performance dimension must be scored based only on transactional and review data. Since order volume, transaction amount, and store rating are missing, and the review count is 0, commercial validation is limited. This creates uncertainty for procurement teams seeking evidence of recent platform activity and buyer acceptance.
Final Score
6 / 20
- Service Capability
Basis
- Communication response time: ≤4h
- Full Customization: listed in certification / industry tags
- ODM service available: listed in certification / industry tags
Elaboration
The supplier has a disclosed response time of within 4 hours, which indicates a reasonable communication standard, though it is not at the fastest response level. The availability of Full Customization and ODM service suggests the supplier can support tailored requirements, which is important for bus procurement where configurations, specifications, and compliance requirements may vary by buyer.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier shows solid service capability through customization and ODM availability. However, the response time is not within the ≤1 hour benchmark required for the highest service score. The data also does not include information on multilingual support, engineering consultation speed, after-sales service, or project management capability. A mid-to-high score is therefore appropriate.
Final Score
7 / 10
- Delivery Performance
Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%
Elaboration
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate. Based on the provided scoring standard, any rate above 90% qualifies for the highest scoring range. This is a positive delivery indicator, particularly for vehicle procurement where production and logistics timelines can be critical.
Scoring Rationale
The reported on-time delivery rate meets the maximum performance band. However, the data does not include the number of orders behind this rate, shipment destinations, or whether the rate is based on recent transactions. Since the provided figure is 100.0%, the score should reflect excellent delivery performance while noting that supporting transaction volume is unavailable.
Final Score
10 / 10
- Quality & Customer Feedback
Basis
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0
- Finished Product Inspection: listed
- Factory Verification / verified supplier: True
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%, relevant but not a direct quality score
Elaboration
The supplier has some quality assurance indicators, including Finished Product Inspection and verified supplier status. These are positive controls for procurement evaluation, especially for finished vehicle products. However, the lack of store rating and the absence of customer reviews mean there is no buyer-side evidence in the provided data to validate product satisfaction, defect rates, or post-delivery performance.
Scoring Rationale
The quality framework appears partially supported by inspection and verification labels, but customer feedback data is insufficient. With 0 reviews and no store rating, the supplier cannot be scored in the higher range for this dimension, because actual buyer feedback is a key part of the evaluation. The score reflects basic quality assurance presence but limited market-validated feedback.
Final Score
13 / 20
Total Score
Company Strength: 19 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility: 17 / 20
Business Performance: 6 / 20
Service Capability: 7 / 10
Delivery Performance: 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback: 13 / 20
Total Score: 72 / 100
Procurement Recommendation
Cooperation Recommendation
Recommended with due diligence. Anhui Ankai Automobile Co., Ltd. shows strong manufacturing scale, verified supplier status, long Gold Supplier history, customization capability, and excellent disclosed on-time delivery performance. However, the lack of transaction data, store rating, and customer reviews prevents a fully confident procurement decision.
Suitable Customer Type
This supplier is most suitable for buyers seeking city buses, electric buses, minibuses, or double-decker buses, especially those requiring customization or ODM support. It may fit project-based procurement where factory scale and product configuration capability are more important than small-ticket platform transaction history.
Main Risk Points
- Insufficient Data on past 6-month order volume and transaction value
- No available store rating
- Review count is 0, limiting customer feedback validation
- Trade Assurance is not supported
- One listed product has MOQ shown as “1 acre,” which appears inconsistent with vehicle procurement data and should be clarified directly with the supplier
Growth Potential
The supplier has strong potential due to large factory scale, 2,100+ staff, verified status, 9-year Gold Supplier history, and customization-related tags. If it can provide recent transaction records, customer references, quality inspection documents, and clearer commercial terms, its procurement credibility would improve significantly.
Leave your comment