zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Zhuhai Pengyu Automobile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Zhuhai Pengyu Automobile Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Guangdong, with a reported factory area of over 12,000 m², more than 80 staff, and verified supplier status. Its listed products focus on vehicles and ambulance-related solutions, including the Great Wall POER 4x4, Geely Farizon ambulance vehicle, customized ambulance ABS interiors, and off-road diesel ambulances, with low MOQ levels of 1 unit or 1 piece. The company has 6 years of Gold Supplier history and carries relevant platform labels such as warranty availability, finished product inspection, ODM service availability, and minor customization. However, Trade Assurance is not supported, and key commercial validation data such as six-month order volume, transaction value, store rating, and customer reviews are either missing or zero. Overall, the supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking vehicle or ambulance-related sourcing with low MOQ flexibility, but commercial proof and customer feedback transparency remain limited.

Zhuhai Pengyu Automobile Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Guangdong, China
- Factory area: 12,000+ m²
- Employees: 80+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Product scope includes complete vehicles, ambulance vehicles, ambulance interiors, and off-road ambulance products.

Elaboration
The supplier demonstrates a measurable operational footprint, with a factory area above 12,000 m² and more than 80 employees. This indicates a factory-scale operation rather than a very small trading presence. The verified supplier status further supports the existence of an inspected or platform-recognized business entity. The listed product range also suggests capability across vehicle sales and ambulance-related customization or modification products.

Scoring Rationale
The company shows moderate production and operational strength based on factory size, staff count, and verified supplier status. However, the available data does not provide detailed production capacity, annual output, production lines, equipment lists, or internationally recognized factory certifications. Therefore, it should be assessed as a mid-sized stable supplier rather than a large-scale supply chain operator.

Final Score
16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 6 years
- Trade Assurance: False
- Platform/industry labels: Warranty available, Finished product inspection, ODM service available, Minor customization
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has maintained Gold Supplier status for 6 years, which provides a meaningful level of platform history. Verified supplier status and several platform labels strengthen credibility, especially finished product inspection and warranty availability. ODM service and minor customization also indicate the supplier has declared service capabilities beyond simple resale.

Scoring Rationale
A 6-year Gold Supplier record and verified supplier status provide solid platform credibility. The presence of finished product inspection and warranty labels further improves compliance confidence. However, the absence of Trade Assurance is a notable limitation because it reduces transactional protection for buyers. Certification details beyond platform labels are not provided, so compliance credibility is positive but not complete.

Final Score
16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Past 6-month order volume: Insufficient Data
- Past 6-month transaction value: Insufficient Data
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Number of reviews: 0

Elaboration
The available business performance data is weak. There is no disclosed order volume, no transaction amount, and no store rating. The review count is explicitly listed as 0, meaning there is no customer feedback record available in the provided dataset. This limits the ability to confirm real transaction scale or buyer satisfaction through platform activity.

Scoring Rationale
Because order quantity, transaction value, and store rating are missing, the supplier lacks measurable commercial validation. The zero review count further reduces confidence in demonstrated marketplace performance. While the company may have operational capabilities, the provided data does not support a conclusion of strong or even moderate recent business performance.

Final Score
8 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤8h
- ODM service available
- Minor customization
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier’s stated response time of within 8 hours is acceptable but not highly responsive compared with suppliers responding within 1 hour. The available service labels indicate ODM service and minor customization, which suggest some ability to adapt products or provide tailored solutions. However, Full Customization is not listed, and the data does not include details on engineering support, design capability, after-sales structure, or dedicated project management.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates basic-to-moderate service capability through ODM availability, minor customization, and an acceptable response window. However, the absence of Full Customization data and the response time not reaching the highest service benchmark prevent a top score. The service capability is suitable for standard or moderately customized sourcing needs but not fully proven for complex custom projects.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which meets the highest threshold in the scoring framework. This suggests strong delivery reliability based on the provided platform data. However, the dataset does not include the number of orders behind this percentage, so the strength of this metric depends on an undisclosed sample size.

Scoring Rationale
Based strictly on the provided on-time delivery rate, the supplier qualifies for the highest delivery performance band. The lack of order volume data creates some uncertainty, but the reported percentage itself is excellent and directly supports a high score.

Final Score
10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Number of reviews: 0
- Finished product inspection: Available
- Verified supplier: True
- Warranty available

Elaboration
The supplier has several quality-related signals, including finished product inspection, verified supplier status, and warranty availability. These are useful quality assurance indicators at the platform level. However, there is no store rating and no customer review record. This means product quality cannot be validated through buyer feedback in the provided data.

Scoring Rationale
The presence of finished product inspection and warranty support provides a basic quality assurance foundation. Verified supplier status also contributes positively. Nevertheless, the absence of ratings and the zero review count significantly limit customer-side quality validation. Therefore, the supplier should be scored as having basic quality safeguards but insufficient market feedback evidence.

Final Score
12 / 20

Total Score

69 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Zhuhai Pengyu Automobile Co., Ltd. can be considered for cautious cooperation, especially for buyers sourcing ambulance-related vehicles, off-road ambulance solutions, vehicle interiors, or low-MOQ vehicle procurement. The supplier is most suitable for buyers who prioritize factory presence, low minimum order quantity, verified supplier status, and basic customization options.

However, cooperation should be managed carefully due to several risks: missing recent order volume, missing transaction value, unavailable store rating, zero customer reviews, and lack of Trade Assurance. These gaps reduce visibility into actual commercial performance and buyer satisfaction.

Recommended approach: initiate with sample evaluation, detailed specification confirmation, factory verification documents, product inspection requirements, warranty terms, and milestone-based payment arrangements. The supplier shows growth potential due to its factory size, 6-year Gold Supplier history, verified status, finished product inspection label, and ambulance-related product range, but it requires further commercial validation before large-volume procurement.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Dali Automobile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dali Automobile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Associated Engineers Zhuhai S.E.Z. Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Associated Engineers Zhuhai S.E.Z. Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Qitenda Automobile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Qitenda Automobile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kaili Automobile Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kaili Automobile Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Nissan Automobile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Nissan Automobile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chengli Automobile (Wuhan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chengli Automobile (Wuhan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Ankai Automobile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Ankai Automobile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiangyang Tenglong Automobile Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Xiangyang Tenglong Automobile Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Ruitu Automobile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Ruitu Automobile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Clw Automobile Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Clw Automobile Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chengli Special Automobile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chengli Special Automobile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Ruili Automobile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Ruili Automobile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Dongye Automobile Accessories Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Dongye Automobile Accessories Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Zywell Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Zywell Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Topa Paper Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Topa Paper Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Teamsung Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Teamsung Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Boyeezon Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Boyeezon Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Enlite Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Enlite Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Morning Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Morning Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Gaoya Kitchenware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Gaoya Kitchenware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Ningbo Super Commercial Kitchen Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Super Commercial Kitchen Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chaozhou Haixinwei Electronic Factory Supplier Evaluation
Chaozhou Haixinwei Electronic Factory Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Pingdi Aolq Bathroom Supply Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Pingdi Aolq Bathroom Supply Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Longtai Maimaiduo Information Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Longtai Maimaiduo Information Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Rogenilan Windows And Doors Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Rogenilan Windows And Doors Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Lanxin Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Lanxin Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Bocast Welding Technology (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Bocast Welding Technology (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Honest Heavy Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Honest Heavy Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Wansongtang Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Wansongtang Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Langyun Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Langyun Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Tengda Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Tengda Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Zhongtai Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Zhongtai Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Kecheng Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Kecheng Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Juber Electrical Appliance Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Juber Electrical Appliance Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Aike Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Aike Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huanyu (Shandong) Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huanyu (Shandong) Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Enping Rayco Audio Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Enping Rayco Audio Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sino Material (Jiangsu) Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sino Material (Jiangsu) Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Ningzi Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Ningzi Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Wangyuan Electronic Equipment  Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Wangyuan Electronic Equipment Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026