Anping Xiaode Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Anping Xiaode Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Hebei, with reported factory scale of 14,000+ ㎡ and 100+ staff. The company shows a moderate manufacturing foundation and is marked as a verified supplier, which supports basic supply-chain credibility. Its platform profile includes 1 year as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and capability tags such as Finished Product Inspection, ODM service, Full Customization, and Minor Customization. However, its commercial track record is still limited: only 1 order and CN¥6K+ transaction value in the past six months, with no shop rating and 0 reviews provided. Delivery data is strong, showing a 100.0% on-time shipment rate, while service response is listed as within 2 hours. Overall, this supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking a developing but verified manufacturing source with customization capability, especially for trial orders or controlled-volume procurement, but not yet ideal for buyers requiring strong historical transaction validation or extensive customer feedback.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory area: 14,000+ ㎡
- Employees: 100+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Location: Hebei, China

Elaboration
The supplier has a clearly stated physical production base and workforce size. A 14,000+ ㎡ facility and 100+ employees indicate more than a very small workshop-level operation. The verified supplier status also adds support to the existence and baseline credibility of the company’s manufacturing setup.

Scoring Rationale
The company demonstrates a stable mid-sized factory profile. Its factory area and employee count support basic production capacity, but the available data does not show evidence of very large-scale operations, multiple production sites, advanced factory certifications, or detailed audited capacity. Therefore, it fits best within the medium stable factory range rather than the highest tier.

Final Score
16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 1 year
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verification status: Verified supplier marked as True
- Certification / capability tags: Finished Product Inspection, ODM service available, Full Customization, Minor Customization

Elaboration
The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status and Trade Assurance. The presence of verification and inspection/customization-related tags improves platform trustworthiness. However, the Gold Supplier history is only 1 year, which limits long-term credibility evidence.

Scoring Rationale
Core platform credibility elements are present, including Trade Assurance and verification. The main limitation is the short Gold Supplier duration, which means the supplier has not yet built a long platform history. The certification tags are useful, but the data does not provide external certificates or detailed audit documents beyond the listed labels.

Final Score
16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 1
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥6K+
- Shop rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0

Elaboration
The supplier has recorded business activity, but the transaction volume is very limited. One order and CN¥6K+ transaction value over six months suggest early-stage or low-volume platform performance. The absence of shop rating and customer reviews further limits commercial validation.

Scoring Rationale
Business performance is the weakest area in the profile. Although there is at least one transaction, the order count and transaction amount are low, and there is no customer rating or review base to support market acceptance. This places the supplier below the normal commercial validation threshold.

Final Score
8 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤2h
- Full Customization: listed
- Minor Customization: listed
- ODM service available: listed

Elaboration
The supplier shows solid service capability through a response time within 2 hours and multiple customization-related tags. Full customization and ODM availability suggest the supplier can support buyers with non-standard or tailored requirements, based strictly on the provided platform labels.

Scoring Rationale
The response speed is good but not within the highest benchmark of ≤1 hour. Customization capability is clearly supported by the provided tags, which strengthens the service profile. Overall, service capability appears reliable, though not at the top tier due to the response-time benchmark.

Final Score
8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time shipment rate: 100.0%

Elaboration
The supplier’s listed delivery performance is excellent, with a 100.0% on-time shipment rate. This indicates that, based on the available data, completed shipments have met the expected delivery timeline.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time shipment rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 point range. Since the provided rate is 100.0%, the supplier receives the full score for this dimension. However, the data does not state the number of shipments behind this rate.

Final Score
10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Finished Product Inspection: listed
- Verified supplier: True
- Shop rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0
- Factory Verification: supplier verification is marked True, but detailed factory verification documentation is Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has a listed Finished Product Inspection capability and verified supplier status, which are positive quality-related indicators. However, customer feedback is not available because there is no rating and the review count is 0. This creates a major limitation in assessing real buyer satisfaction and product consistency.

Scoring Rationale
The quality assurance side has some positive signals, especially Finished Product Inspection and verification status. However, the lack of customer reviews and missing shop rating prevent a higher score. The supplier has basic quality assurance indicators, but customer-side validation remains insufficient.

Final Score
12 / 20

Total Score

70 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended for trial orders, sample validation, or controlled-volume procurement. The supplier is suitable for buyers who value verified factory presence, Trade Assurance, customization capability, and strong listed delivery performance. The main risks are limited transaction history, only 1 order in the past six months, CN¥6K+ transaction value, 0 reviews, and no available shop rating. Growth potential exists if the supplier continues building transaction volume, customer feedback, and longer-term platform credibility.