Dongguan Tianshi Plastic Packaging Product Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Executive Summary
Dongguan Tianshi Plastic Packaging Product Co., Ltd. is a China-based packaging supplier located in Guangdong, with a reported factory area of over 11,000㎡ and more than 80 staff. Based on the provided data, the company appears to be a medium-sized packaging manufacturer with verified supplier status and a product portfolio covering PET plastic packaging boxes, window boxes, corrugated boxes, and recyclable PET packaging. Its platform profile shows 3 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and compliance-related tags including low MOQ customization, warranty availability, and finished product inspection. Commercially, the supplier has recorded 80+ orders and CN¥676.1K+ transaction value in the past six months, supported by a 4.9 store rating, though the review base is relatively limited at 10+ reviews. The supplier is suitable for buyers seeking packaging products with low MOQ, responsive communication, and reliable delivery performance, while larger buyers should further verify production capacity and quality consistency before scaling orders.

Detailed Analysis
1. Company Strength — 20 Points
Basis
- Company: Dongguan Tianshi Plastic Packaging Product Co., Ltd.
- Country/Region: China, Guangdong
- Factory area: 11,000+㎡
- Employees: 80+ staff
- Verified supplier / factory verification status: True
- Product categories provided: PET plastic packaging boxes, window boxes, corrugated boxes, recyclable PET packaging boxes
Elaboration
The supplier has a reported factory area exceeding 11,000㎡, which indicates a meaningful physical production base rather than a very small workshop-type operation. The employee count of 80+ staff suggests that the company has a moderate labor structure to support production, handling, packaging, and order fulfillment activities. The presence of verified supplier status adds credibility to the supplier’s stated factory profile.
From the product information provided, the supplier focuses on plastic and paper-based packaging products, including transparent PET boxes, corrugated boxes, window boxes, and recyclable PET plastic packaging. This shows a relatively focused packaging manufacturing scope rather than an overly broad or unrelated product mix. However, the data does not provide detailed information on production lines, monthly output, machinery, automation level, in-house tooling capacity, or factory audit reports.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates characteristics of a medium-sized stable factory: a factory area above 11,000㎡, more than 80 employees, and verified supplier status. These factors support a positive assessment of its basic production capability. However, the available data does not prove large-scale production capacity at the level of a major industrial supplier, and there is insufficient information on actual monthly capacity, equipment, or formal factory certifications beyond verification status. Therefore, it fits best into the “medium-sized stable factory” range.
Final Score
16 / 20
2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points
Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 3 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry tags:
- Low MOQ for customization
- Warranty available
- Finished product inspection
- Verified supplier: True
Elaboration
The supplier has 3 years of Gold Supplier status, which provides a certain level of platform credibility. Trade Assurance support is also a positive factor because it gives buyers an additional transaction protection mechanism through the platform. The supplier also carries platform or industry-related tags including low MOQ customization, warranty availability, and finished product inspection.
The presence of finished product inspection is especially relevant for packaging procurement because defects in box clarity, printing, structure, folding, and dimensions can directly affect downstream product presentation. However, the data does not include third-party management system certifications such as ISO, BSCI, FSC, GRS, or other industry-specific compliance documentation. Therefore, while the platform credibility is solid, the compliance profile cannot be considered fully comprehensive based on the provided information.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier has several core credibility indicators: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, and product inspection-related labeling. The 3-year Gold Supplier duration is useful but not long enough to be classified as a long-established platform record. Certification tag completeness is moderate rather than extensive because no formal factory audit certificate or quality management certification details are provided. This places the supplier in the upper part of the “core certifications complete but shorter duration” range.
Final Score
17 / 20
3. Business Performance — 20 Points
Basis
- Orders in the past 6 months: 80+
- Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥676.1K+
- Store rating: 4.9
- Number of reviews: 10+
Elaboration
The supplier has achieved more than 80 orders in the past six months, indicating active commercial performance on the platform. The transaction value of CN¥676.1K+ over the same period shows that the supplier has generated measurable sales volume and is not merely a listing-based or inactive seller. A 4.9 store rating is strong and suggests that buyers who provided feedback generally had positive experiences.
However, the number of reviews is only 10+, which is relatively limited compared with the order count. This means the available public feedback base is not yet large enough to fully validate long-term buyer satisfaction across many transactions. The business performance is therefore solid and active, but not yet supported by a high-volume review base or very large disclosed transaction scale.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier shows stable mid-level commercial activity, with 80+ recent orders and CN¥676.1K+ transaction value. The 4.9 rating is a strong positive indicator, but the low number of reviews limits the strength of customer validation. The order and transaction figures are meaningful but do not clearly indicate a very high-volume, top-tier transaction profile. Therefore, the supplier is best assessed as having stable medium-scale business performance.
Final Score
16 / 20
4. Service Capability — 10 Points
Basis
- Communication response time: ≤1 hour
- Customization-related tag: Low MOQ for customization
- Full Customization support: Insufficient Data
Elaboration
The supplier’s stated response time of less than or equal to one hour is a strong service indicator. For international procurement, fast response time is important during quotation confirmation, artwork review, sample discussions, delivery coordination, and issue resolution. The platform tag “Low MOQ for customization” also indicates some level of customization support, particularly for buyers requiring smaller customized packaging runs.
However, the provided data does not explicitly state whether the supplier supports Full Customization. It also does not specify the customization scope, such as custom printing, structural design, material thickness, color matching, mold development, or packaging engineering support. Therefore, the service capability is positive in terms of responsiveness, but the depth of customization capability cannot be fully confirmed.
Scoring Rationale
The response speed of ≤1 hour meets the highest response-time standard. The supplier also has a customization-related platform tag, which supports a positive service evaluation. However, because Full Customization is not directly confirmed and customization details are not provided, it would be inappropriate to assign a perfect score. The supplier appears to have strong basic service responsiveness with some customization capability, but not enough data to confirm advanced customization service depth.
Final Score
8 / 10
5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points
Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 97.7%
Elaboration
The supplier’s on-time delivery rate of 97.7% is a strong indicator of delivery reliability. In packaging procurement, delivery performance is especially important because packaging delays can disrupt product launch schedules, fulfillment timelines, retail packing operations, and shipment consolidation plans. A delivery rate above 90% indicates that the supplier is generally able to meet agreed dispatch timelines.
The data does not provide further details on average lead time, production cycle, peak-season performance, logistics methods, or historical delay reasons. However, based strictly on the provided on-time delivery rate, the supplier demonstrates a high level of delivery performance.
Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9 to 10 points. At 97.7%, the supplier is well above the 90% threshold and close to full reliability within the available data. Since no negative delivery indicators are provided, a top-range score is justified.
Final Score
10 / 10
6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points
Basis
- Store rating: 4.9
- Number of reviews: 10+
- Finished product inspection: Present as certification / industry tag
- Verified supplier / factory verification: True
- Warranty available: Present as certification / industry tag
Elaboration
The supplier has a high store rating of 4.9, which is a positive sign for buyer satisfaction. The presence of a finished product inspection tag suggests that the supplier has some quality control process before shipment. Verified supplier status also contributes to quality assurance credibility because it supports the legitimacy of the supplier’s operational profile.
The “Warranty available” tag is another positive service and quality-related indicator, though the data does not specify warranty scope, claim procedures, defect tolerance, or compensation terms. The main limitation is the relatively small review base of 10+ reviews. While the rating is high, the limited number of reviews means the quality feedback is not yet supported by a broad sample of customer experiences. There is also insufficient data on formal quality certifications, inspection standards, defect rates, AQL levels, material test reports, or compliance with packaging-specific environmental standards.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier has several favorable quality indicators: 4.9 rating, finished product inspection, verified supplier status, and warranty availability. These factors support a solid quality assurance profile. However, the review count is still limited, and there is no detailed evidence of formal quality management systems or third-party certifications. As a result, the supplier should be scored in the “good rating with basic quality assurance” range rather than the highest category.
Final Score
17 / 20
Total Score
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Company Strength | 16 / 20 |
| Platform & Compliance Credibility | 17 / 20 |
| Business Performance | 16 / 20 |
| Service Capability | 8 / 10 |
| Delivery Performance | 10 / 10 |
| Quality & Customer Feedback | 17 / 20 |
| Total Score | 84 / 100 |
Procurement Recommendation
Recommendation: Recommended for cooperation, with controlled order scaling.
Dongguan Tianshi Plastic Packaging Product Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking PET plastic packaging boxes, corrugated boxes, window boxes, and recyclable PET packaging with relatively low MOQ requirements. The supplier is especially suitable for small to medium-sized buyers, e-commerce brands, promotional packaging buyers, and companies requiring responsive communication and stable delivery performance.
The main strengths are its 11,000+㎡ factory area, 80+ staff, verified supplier status, Trade Assurance support, 97.7% on-time delivery rate, and strong 4.9 store rating. These indicators suggest a reliable medium-sized packaging supplier with active platform transactions.
Key risks include the limited review base of only 10+ reviews, insufficient data on Full Customization capability, and lack of provided information on formal quality certifications, production capacity, machinery, monthly output, and detailed inspection standards. For larger-volume or brand-sensitive packaging projects, buyers should request samples, confirm production capacity, clarify inspection criteria, and verify customization scope before placing bulk orders.
Overall, the supplier shows good growth potential, particularly for buyers prioritizing responsive service, low MOQ customization, and reliable delivery.
Leave your comment