Blue Sea Plastic Product Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Supplier Evaluation Report: Blue Sea Plastic Product Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Blue Sea Plastic Product Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Jiangsu, with a reported factory area of over 8,000㎡ and more than 150 staff. The company appears to have a medium-scale manufacturing base and is marked as a verified supplier, which supports a basic level of operational credibility. On , the supplier has 8 years of Gold Supplier history, supports Trade Assurance, and shows platform labels including low MOQ for customization, response time within 3 hours, and 100% on-time delivery.

However, its recent commercial performance is relatively limited, with only 5 orders and 5 reviews in the past six months, despite a transaction value of CN¥202.8K+. The store rating of 4.2 is acceptable but not strong. This supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking small-to-medium trial orders, low-MOQ customization, and PVC waterplay/outdoor product sourcing, but larger buyers should conduct additional quality verification before scaling procurement.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Factory location: Jiangsu, China
• Factory area: 8,000+㎡
• Employees: 150+ staff
• Verified supplier / factory audit status: True
• Product listings indicate PVC waterplay/outdoor-related products with varying MOQs from 1 piece to 300 pieces.

Elaboration

The supplier has a reported factory area above 8,000㎡ and a workforce of more than 150 employees, indicating a medium-sized production organization rather than a small trading-only operation. The verified supplier status provides additional support that the company has undergone some form of platform or supplier verification.

The listed product range includes several PVC waterplay or outdoor-related items, with different minimum order quantities, suggesting the supplier can handle both smaller trial purchases and larger batch orders. However, the data does not include detailed production lines, annual output, machinery count, capacity utilization, or specific factory certification records beyond the verified supplier status.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates a stable medium-scale manufacturing profile based on factory size, staff count, and verified supplier status. Its production base is stronger than a small workshop, but the available data does not prove large-scale supply chain capability at the highest level. The absence of detailed production capacity, equipment information, and formal factory certification data prevents a top-tier score.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 8 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier: True
• Platform labels:
• Low MOQ for customization
• Response time ≤3h
• On-time delivery 100.0%
• Industry or product compliance certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has maintained Gold Supplier status for 8 years, which is a meaningful indicator of platform continuity. Trade Assurance support further strengthens transaction security for buyers. The verified supplier status also contributes positively to platform credibility.

The supplier’s platform labels show operational features such as low-MOQ customization, acceptable response time, and strong delivery performance. However, the provided data does not include specific product compliance certifications, export certificates, safety testing reports, or industry-standard quality certifications.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a strong platform profile, supported by 8 years of Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status. These are important trust indicators for international buyers. Nevertheless, because no specific product compliance certificates or third-party quality certifications are provided, the compliance profile is not fully complete. The score reflects strong platform credibility but limited documented certification depth.

Final Score

18 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: 5
• Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥202.8K+
• Store rating: 4.2
• Number of reviews: 5

Elaboration

The supplier has generated CN¥202.8K+ in transaction value over the past six months, which indicates some commercial activity and buyer engagement. However, the number of orders is low at only 5, and the review count is also limited to 5. This means the available commercial validation is relatively narrow.

The store rating of 4.2 is acceptable but not highly competitive compared with suppliers that maintain stronger ratings supported by larger review volumes. The transaction amount suggests some order value, but the low order count limits confidence in repeatability, customer diversity, and overall market acceptance.

Scoring Rationale

Business performance is moderate-to-low based on the available data. The transaction amount is not negligible, but the low number of orders and reviews weakens the evidence of stable market demand. The 4.2 rating is usable but does not indicate outstanding customer satisfaction. Therefore, the supplier cannot be classified as high-performing from a commercial validation perspective.

Final Score

11 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤3h
• Platform label: Low MOQ for customization
• Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s stated response time of within 3 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency for B2B sourcing. The platform label “Low MOQ for customization” suggests that the supplier can support some level of customization at relatively accessible order quantities.

However, there is no explicit confirmation of Full Customization capability in the provided data. The customization information is therefore limited to low-MOQ customization only. There is also no information on dedicated sales support, engineering support, design capability, sampling lead time, or after-sales handling.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows a normal service capability level, with response time within 3 hours and some customization support. However, because the response time is not within 1 hour and Full Customization is not confirmed, the supplier does not meet the criteria for a top service score. The available data supports a solid but not exceptional service rating.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is the strongest available delivery indicator in the provided data. This suggests that, based on recorded platform performance, the supplier has fulfilled shipments within agreed timelines.

However, this delivery result should be interpreted alongside the relatively low recent order count of 5 orders in the past six months. While the delivery rate itself is excellent, the sample size is limited, so larger buyers should still confirm lead times, production scheduling, and shipping arrangements before placing high-volume orders.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. With a reported rate of 100.0%, the supplier reaches the top delivery-performance bracket. The limited number of orders is a contextual consideration, but the delivery metric itself fully supports a maximum score.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Store rating: 4.2
• Number of reviews: 5
• Verified supplier / factory verification: True
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
• Product-specific quality certifications or testing reports: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a store rating of 4.2, which indicates acceptable customer feedback but not a high-performance rating. The review count is very limited at only 5, making it difficult to draw a strong conclusion about long-term customer satisfaction or defect consistency.

The verified supplier status provides some quality-related credibility because it suggests that the supplier has passed a form of supplier or factory verification. However, the data does not confirm whether Finished Product Inspection is available. There is also no information on product testing, inspection procedures, defect rate, quality management certifications, or third-party audit reports.

Scoring Rationale

The quality and feedback profile is incomplete. The supplier benefits from verified status and an acceptable rating, but the limited review base reduces confidence. The absence of Finished Product Inspection data and specific quality certifications prevents the supplier from reaching a higher score. This dimension should be treated as a key due diligence area before bulk procurement.

Final Score

12 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditionally Recommended

Blue Sea Plastic Product Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking a medium-scale China-based supplier with verified platform status, Trade Assurance support, low-MOQ customization potential, and strong recorded delivery performance. The supplier may be appropriate for trial orders, small-to-medium procurement projects, and buyers sourcing PVC waterplay or outdoor-related products shown in the provided listings.

However, larger-volume buyers should proceed with additional due diligence before committing to scaled purchasing. The main risks are the low number of recent orders, limited review volume, moderate store rating of 4.2, and insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection, product certifications, quality control systems, and production capacity details.

The supplier’s growth potential is supported by its 8-year Gold Supplier history, verified supplier status, 8,000+㎡ factory area, 150+ staff, and 100% on-time delivery record. If the supplier can provide stronger inspection documentation, product compliance certificates, and more consistent customer feedback, its procurement suitability would improve significantly.