Shenzhen Cyber Blue Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Supplier Evaluation Report: Shenzhen Cyber Blue Electronic Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Shenzhen Cyber Blue Electronic Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Guangdong, offering electronics-related mystery box and novelty electronic products with low minimum order quantities starting from 1 piece or 1 box. The company shows a moderate operating scale, with a reported factory area of 1,000+ m² and 50+ staff, and is identified as a verified supplier. Its platform credibility is relatively strong, supported by 6 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, factory/supplier verification, and service tags including Full Customization, ODM service, Warranty Available, and Finished Product Inspection. Commercial activity is visible, with 1,000+ orders and CN¥202.8K+ transaction value over the past six months. However, the store rating of 3.6 indicates a notable quality or satisfaction risk despite 600+ reviews. Overall, this supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ, customizable novelty electronics products, but quality consistency and customer satisfaction should be carefully validated before scaling orders.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Country/Region: China, Guangdong
• Factory area: 1,000+ m²
• Employees: 50+ staff
• Verified supplier: True
• Factory certification details beyond verification: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a defined physical production base with a reported factory area of over 1,000 m² and more than 50 employees. This indicates that the company is not merely a trading storefront and has at least a basic operational and staffing structure. The verified supplier status further supports the existence of a legitimate business and production-related capability.

However, based on the provided data, the company does not appear to be a large-scale manufacturing operation. The factory size and employee count suggest a small to lower-medium production scale rather than a large industrial supplier. No additional factory audit reports, ISO certifications, production line numbers, annual capacity, or equipment information are provided.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates basic manufacturing strength through its factory area, workforce size, and verified supplier status. These factors support its ability to handle regular small or medium-volume procurement. However, the relatively modest factory size and staff count limit confidence in large-volume or highly complex supply programs. Since no further production capacity data or formal factory certifications are provided, the score should remain within the “small but with basic production capability” range.

Final Score

13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 6 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier: True
• Certification / service tags: Warranty available, Full customization, ODM service available, Finished product inspection

Elaboration

The supplier has a relatively solid platform profile. Six years as a Gold Supplier indicates an established presence rather than a newly listed supplier. Trade Assurance provides an additional transaction protection mechanism for buyers. The verified supplier status improves credibility, and the listed platform tags show that the supplier offers warranty support, customization, ODM services, and finished product inspection.

The compliance profile is strong at the platform level. However, the provided data does not include internationally recognized product certifications, management system certifications, or compliance documents specific to electronics products. Therefore, while platform credibility is strong, regulatory or product-level compliance cannot be fully confirmed.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier meets several key credibility indicators: long-term Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, supplier verification, and multiple capability tags. These collectively create a strong platform-based trust profile. The 6-year Gold Supplier history is meaningful and supports a higher score. The score is not placed at the absolute maximum because no independent product certifications or detailed compliance documentation are provided.

Final Score

18 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Orders in past 6 months: 1,000+
• Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥202.8K+
• Store rating: 3.6
• Reviews: 600+

Elaboration

The supplier has clear transaction activity, with more than 1,000 orders over the past six months. This shows that the store has active buyer demand and operational order-handling experience. The review count of 600+ also provides a meaningful volume of customer feedback, which is better than suppliers with very limited transaction history.

However, the store rating of 3.6 is a significant concern. While order volume is strong, the relatively low rating suggests possible issues in product satisfaction, communication, fulfillment consistency, product expectations, or after-sales handling. The six-month transaction value of CN¥202.8K+ confirms active sales, but it is not high enough to clearly indicate large-scale commercial performance.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier performs well in terms of order count and review volume, showing that it has real marketplace traction. However, the low store rating materially weakens the business performance assessment. A supplier with high order volume but only a 3.6 rating cannot be evaluated as high-performing without caution. Therefore, the score is placed in the stable but risk-adjusted medium range.

Final Score

14 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Response time: ≤3h
• Full customization: Available
• ODM service: Available
• Communication efficiency beyond response time: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier reports a response time of within 3 hours, which indicates acceptable communication speed for online sourcing. It also lists Full Customization and ODM service availability, suggesting that it can support customized buyer requirements rather than only standard off-the-shelf products.

However, the response time does not meet the strongest service benchmark of within 1 hour. Also, no additional data is provided regarding quotation speed, sample lead time, engineering support, account management, multilingual support, or after-sales service performance.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows good basic service capability due to its acceptable response time and customization/ODM offering. The presence of Full Customization is a positive factor, especially for buyers needing differentiated products. Nevertheless, because response time is not within 1 hour and detailed communication quality data is unavailable, the score should remain below the top band.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time dispatch rate: 95.2%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time dispatch rate of 95.2% is strong. According to the scoring standard, a rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 point range. This suggests the supplier has a relatively reliable order processing and dispatch capability.

However, the data only reflects on-time dispatch, not full delivery completion, logistics transit time, damage rate, cancellation rate, or late-delivery dispute rate. Therefore, while dispatch performance is strong, complete delivery reliability cannot be fully assessed from the available data.

Scoring Rationale

A 95.2% on-time dispatch rate is a clear strength and supports a high delivery score. The supplier appears capable of meeting dispatch commitments for most orders. The score is not set at the maximum because the provided data does not include broader delivery metrics such as final arrival punctuality or logistics issue rates.

Final Score

9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Store rating: 3.6
• Reviews: 600+
• Finished Product Inspection: Available
• Verified supplier / Factory Verification: True
• Detailed defect rate, return rate, product certification, or inspection reports: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a meaningful review base of more than 600 reviews, which gives some visibility into customer feedback. It also lists Finished Product Inspection, which is a positive quality-control indicator. The verified supplier status further supports the existence of a verified operating entity.

However, the store rating of 3.6 is a major limitation. For procurement evaluation, this rating suggests that customer satisfaction is not consistently strong. Although there are many reviews, the quality of those reviews appears mixed or below ideal based on the rating. No detailed product inspection records, defect rates, third-party test reports, or quality certifications are provided.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has basic quality assurance signals, especially Finished Product Inspection and supplier verification. The large number of reviews also gives useful market feedback. However, the 3.6 rating significantly reduces confidence in quality consistency and customer satisfaction. Because of this, the supplier should not be rated in the high-quality category despite having inspection-related tags.

Final Score

13 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional Cooperation Recommended

Shenzhen Cyber Blue Electronic Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ novelty electronics, mystery box products, or customizable electronic gift-type products. The supplier’s strengths include 6 years of Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, Full Customization, ODM service availability, Finished Product Inspection, strong recent order volume, and a 95.2% on-time dispatch rate.

However, buyers should proceed cautiously due to the 3.6 store rating, which indicates potential quality or satisfaction risks. Before placing large-volume orders, procurement teams should request samples, confirm product specifications in writing, use Trade Assurance, and conduct pre-shipment inspection where possible.

This supplier is best suited for small to medium buyers, trial orders, customized low-MOQ projects, and price-sensitive product testing. It may have growth potential due to active transaction volume and platform credibility, but quality consistency must be verified before deeper cooperation.