Nantong Litai Jianlong Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Nantong Litai Jianlong Food Co., Ltd. is a China-based food supplier located in Jiangshu, with a reported factory area of over 16,000㎡ and more than 80 staff. The supplier shows a relatively solid manufacturing foundation, supported by supplier verification status and a 10-year Gold Supplier history. Its listed product range focuses on assorted fruit-flavored, sweet/sour, sugar-free, seasonal, and collagen-related food items, with MOQ levels indicating suitability for wholesale and bulk purchasing rather than very small trial orders. Platform credibility is strong, with Trade Assurance, Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, ODM service availability, and Minor Customization listed. Commercial performance is moderate to strong, with 20+ orders and CN¥3.3M+ transaction value in the past six months, though the review count is limited at 7. Overall, this supplier is suitable for buyers seeking medium-scale to large-scale customized food product sourcing with platform-backed transaction protection, while customer feedback depth and delivery stability should be monitored.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

• Company name: Nantong Litai Jianlong Food Co., Ltd.
• Country: China
• Factory location: Jiangshu
• Factory area: 16,000+㎡
• Employees: 80+ staff
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier reports a factory area exceeding 16,000㎡, which indicates a meaningful physical production base. The workforce of over 80 employees suggests a medium-sized operational structure rather than a very small workshop. The presence of verified supplier status further supports the credibility of its stated manufacturing identity. Based on the available information, the company appears to have a stable production foundation suitable for recurring wholesale orders and customized production projects.

However, the data does not include detailed production line numbers, annual output capacity, equipment lists, export volume, or factory audit reports beyond the verified supplier status. Therefore, while the supplier demonstrates solid factory scale, its full production capacity cannot be completely quantified from the provided data.

Scoring Rationale

A 16,000+㎡ facility combined with 80+ staff places the supplier above a small-scale operation and within the range of a medium-sized manufacturing supplier. The verified supplier status adds confidence, but the absence of deeper production-capacity data prevents the supplier from being rated as a top-tier large-scale supply chain operator. The company appears stable and suitable for medium to large procurement needs, but not enough data is available to confirm large-scale industrial dominance.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 10 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier: True
• Certification / industry tags:
• Finished product inspection
• Full customization
• ODM service available
• Minor customization

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong platform credibility profile. A 10-year Gold Supplier history indicates long-term platform presence, which is a positive signal for procurement risk control. Trade Assurance support provides buyers with a platform-backed transaction mechanism. Verified supplier status further strengthens credibility.

The listed platform and service tags are also relatively complete, covering inspection, customization, ODM service, and minor customization. These tags suggest that the supplier is positioned to support both standard and customized procurement requirements. However, the provided data does not include specific food safety certifications, international compliance certificates, or third-party audit documents beyond the listed platform tags.

Scoring Rationale

The combination of 10 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, verified supplier status, and multiple service/inspection tags represents a strong platform-backed credibility structure. The only limitation is that no detailed external certification documentation is provided in the dataset. Therefore, the supplier deserves a high score but not a perfect score due to incomplete certification visibility.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

• Orders in the past six months: 20+
• Transaction value in the past six months: CN¥3.3M+
• Store rating: 4.9
• Number of reviews: 7

Elaboration

The supplier has achieved more than 20 orders and over CN¥3.3M in transaction value during the past six months. This indicates active commercial performance and a meaningful transaction scale. The transaction value is relatively strong compared with the order count, suggesting that some orders may be of higher value or larger volume.

The store rating of 4.9 is positive, indicating favorable buyer satisfaction among recorded reviewers. However, the review count is only 7, which limits the statistical strength of customer feedback. A small review base means that the rating should be interpreted cautiously, as it may not fully represent the supplier’s long-term performance across a wider buyer group.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows good commercial activity, particularly in transaction value. The 20+ order count demonstrates ongoing buyer engagement but does not reach a very high-volume transaction profile. The 4.9 rating is strong, yet the limited number of reviews prevents the score from reaching the highest tier. Overall, the business performance is stable and commercially validated, but feedback depth remains limited.

Final Score

16 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤3h
• Full customization: Listed
• ODM service available: Listed
• Minor customization: Listed

Elaboration

The supplier’s communication response time is within three hours, which is acceptable for international sourcing communication. The presence of Full Customization, ODM service availability, and Minor Customization indicates that the supplier can support different levels of customization, from minor changes to more comprehensive product development cooperation.

This service profile is suitable for buyers requiring customized food products, packaging adjustments, or ODM-based sourcing. However, the response time is not within one hour, which is the benchmark for the highest service-capability score. The data also does not provide information on dedicated account managers, language capability, sample lead time, or after-sales process.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates solid service capability due to its listed customization and ODM support. A response time of ≤3h is reasonable and practical for sourcing communication, but it does not qualify for the top score range reserved for suppliers responding within one hour. The service capability is therefore assessed as strong but not exceptional.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 88.9%

Elaboration

The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate is 88.9%. This falls within the 80%–89% range, indicating acceptable but not leading delivery reliability. For procurement planning, this means the supplier can generally meet shipment schedules, but buyers should still maintain delivery buffers, especially for seasonal, promotional, or time-sensitive orders.

The provided data does not include average lead time, delay reasons, logistics methods, or historical delivery dispute records. Therefore, the delivery assessment is based strictly on the reported on-time shipping rate.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate between 80% and 89% corresponds to 7–8 points. At 88.9%, the supplier is close to the upper end of this range, so a score of 8 is appropriate. The performance is relatively stable, but it remains below the 90% threshold required for a top-tier delivery score.

Final Score

8 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

• Store rating: 4.9
• Number of reviews: 7
• Finished Product Inspection: Listed
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a high store rating of 4.9, which is a positive indicator of buyer satisfaction. The presence of Finished Product Inspection suggests that the supplier has at least a listed quality-check mechanism for completed goods. Verified supplier status also adds credibility to the supplier’s operational profile.

However, the number of reviews is only 7, which limits the reliability of the rating as a broad quality indicator. The data does not include detailed inspection standards, defect rates, food safety certificates, third-party lab testing records, customer complaint history, or return/dispute data. As a result, the supplier appears to have a good basic quality framework, but the depth of available customer feedback and quality documentation is limited.

Scoring Rationale

The high rating and listed Finished Product Inspection support a positive quality assessment. Verified supplier status also strengthens buyer confidence. Nevertheless, the low review count prevents the supplier from being categorized as having extensive customer validation. The score reflects good quality potential with limited feedback volume.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

Nantong Litai Jianlong Food Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking medium-scale or bulk food product sourcing with customization requirements. The supplier’s 16,000+㎡ factory area, 80+ staff, verified supplier status, 10-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, and customization-related service tags make it a credible option for wholesale procurement and ODM/customized product development.

Suitable customer types include:
- Importers and distributors requiring bulk food products
- Buyers seeking customized or ODM food items
- Retail or promotional product buyers with medium to large MOQ acceptance
- Procurement teams that prefer Trade Assurance protection

Main risk points:
- Review count is limited at 7, reducing the depth of customer feedback validation
- On-time delivery rate is 88.9%, acceptable but below top-tier performance
- No detailed food safety certifications or third-party compliance documents are provided in the dataset
- Production capacity details beyond factory area and staff count are insufficient

Growth potential:
The supplier shows strong platform credibility and meaningful transaction value. If it improves delivery consistency, increases verified customer feedback, and provides more detailed quality/compliance documentation, it could become a stronger candidate for larger and more demanding international procurement programs.