zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Yangxi Feifan Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Yangxi Feifan Clothing Co., Ltd. is a Guangdong-based Chinese supplier focused on baseball caps and related customized hat products, including racing caps, toddler baseball hats, mesh sport caps, denim caps, and hip-hop style baseball caps. Based on the provided data, the company operates a factory of over 3,100㎡ with more than 60 staff and is marked as a verified/audited supplier, indicating a basic but credible production foundation. On , the supplier has 4 years of Gold Supplier status, supports Trade Assurance, and carries tags including “Socially responsible,” “Low MOQ for customization,” and “Finished product inspection.” Commercial performance is moderate, with 60+ orders and CN¥67.6K+ transaction value in the past six months. The 4.2 store rating and 10+ reviews provide some customer validation, though feedback volume remains limited. This supplier appears suitable for small to medium buyers seeking low-MOQ cap sourcing with customization flexibility, while larger buyers should conduct additional due diligence before scaling orders.

Yangxi Feifan Clothing Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

  • Factory location: Guangdong, China
  • Factory area: 3,100+㎡
  • Employees: 60+ staff
  • Verified/audited supplier: True

Elaboration

Yangxi Feifan Clothing Co., Ltd. has a physical factory footprint of over 3,100㎡ and more than 60 employees. This indicates a real production setup with a defined operational base, rather than a purely trading-oriented profile. The presence of verified/audited supplier status adds credibility to the company’s manufacturing background.

However, based strictly on the provided data, the company does not appear to be a large-scale manufacturer. The factory size and workforce suggest a small-to-medium production operation. There is no additional information about annual production capacity, number of production lines, machinery, monthly output, export markets, or major customer references.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates basic-to-moderate manufacturing strength through its factory area, employee count, and verified supplier status. The operation appears more stable than a small unverified workshop, but the available scale indicators are not strong enough to classify it as a large-scale supply chain partner. The lack of production capacity data limits confidence in high-volume order fulfillment.

Final Score

14 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 4 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Certification/industry tags:
  • Socially responsible
  • Low MOQ for customization
  • Finished product inspection
  • Verified/audited supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a relatively complete platform credibility profile. Four years as a Gold Supplier indicates a certain level of platform continuity. Trade Assurance support improves buyer protection and transaction security. The presence of “Finished product inspection” provides an additional quality-control-related platform signal.

The “Socially responsible” and “Low MOQ for customization” labels are positive indicators, especially for buyers seeking flexible customized cap orders. However, the data does not provide details on internationally recognized certifications such as ISO, BSCI, SEDEX, OEKO-TEX, or WRAP. Therefore, broader compliance depth cannot be confirmed.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has the core platform credibility elements expected from a reliable supplier: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, verification, and relevant platform tags. The 4-year Gold Supplier history is meaningful but not exceptionally long. Compliance credibility is solid at the platform level, but the absence of detailed third-party certification data prevents a higher score.

Final Score

17 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 60+
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥67.6K+
  • Store rating: 4.2
  • Reviews: 10+

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded over 60 orders in the past six months, showing active commercial movement on the platform. However, the transaction value of CN¥67.6K+ suggests that average order values are relatively modest. This is consistent with low-MOQ or small-batch customized cap sourcing.

The store rating of 4.2 is acceptable but not high compared with top-performing suppliers. The review count of 10+ provides some buyer feedback, but the sample size is still limited. This means the commercial track record is present but not yet strongly validated by a large number of transactions or reviews.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows real platform activity and a moderate number of recent orders, which supports basic business reliability. However, the total transaction value and review count remain relatively low, while the store rating is only moderate. These factors indicate that the supplier has some commercial validation but does not yet demonstrate strong market-proven performance.

Final Score

13 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤2h
  • Customization-related tag: Low MOQ for customization
  • Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of within two hours suggests acceptable communication efficiency for online sourcing. This is useful for buyers managing sampling, quotation, artwork confirmation, or order follow-up.

The platform tag “Low MOQ for customization” indicates that the supplier supports some form of customization with relatively accessible minimum order requirements. Several listed products also contain “customized” or “custom” wording. However, the data does not explicitly confirm “Full Customization,” nor does it specify available customization methods such as embroidery, printing, patches, labels, fabric selection, packaging, or private label service. Therefore, customization depth remains partially unclear.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates reasonable responsiveness and some customization capability. However, because response time is ≤2h rather than ≤1h, and because full customization capability is not clearly confirmed, the service capability should be rated as good but not excellent.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

  • On-time dispatch rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time dispatch rate. This is a strong delivery indicator and suggests that the supplier has performed well in meeting stated dispatch timelines for recorded platform orders.

However, the data does not provide details about average lead time, production cycle, international shipping methods, peak-season capacity, or performance under larger order volumes. Therefore, the delivery score should reflect the excellent available metric while recognizing that broader logistics capability is not fully documented.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time dispatch rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the provided rate is 100.0%, the supplier deserves the maximum score for this dimension based on available data.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.2
  • Reviews: 10+
  • Finished product inspection: True
  • Verified/audited supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a quality-related platform tag for “Finished product inspection,” which indicates that finished goods inspection is part of its listed quality assurance profile. The verified/audited supplier status also supports a baseline level of supplier credibility.

Customer feedback is present but limited. A 4.2 rating is acceptable, but it is not at the level of highly rated suppliers with stronger buyer satisfaction indicators. The review count of 10+ is relatively small, meaning the available feedback sample is not extensive enough to strongly validate consistent quality performance across many buyers.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has basic quality assurance signals, including finished product inspection and supplier verification. However, the moderate rating and limited number of reviews reduce confidence in long-term quality consistency. The quality profile is stronger than suppliers with no inspection or feedback data, but it is not sufficient to rate as top-tier.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 14 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 17 / 20
Business Performance 13 / 20
Service Capability 7 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 16 / 20
Total Score 77 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditionally Recommended

Yangxi Feifan Clothing Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking baseball caps and customized cap products with low MOQ requirements. The supplier appears appropriate for small to medium-sized importers, promotional product buyers, e-commerce sellers, startup brands, and buyers testing new cap designs in smaller quantities.

The main strengths are its verified supplier status, 4-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, 100.0% on-time dispatch rate, and finished product inspection tag. These factors make it a relatively credible sourcing option on the platform.

Key risks include limited review volume, moderate 4.2 store rating, relatively modest six-month transaction value, and insufficient data on full customization capability, production capacity, machinery, export markets, and international compliance certifications.

For trial cooperation, buyers should start with samples or a small pilot order, confirm customization scope in writing, request inspection standards, and use Trade Assurance for payment protection. Growth potential exists if the supplier can improve customer feedback volume, demonstrate stronger quality consistency, and provide more transparent production and compliance documentation.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Pingyang Feifan Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Pingyang Feifan Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Feifan Silicone Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Feifan Silicone Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fuzhou Changle District Feifan Knitting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fuzhou Changle District Feifan Knitting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shantou Fenteng Clothing Factory Supplier Evaluation
Shantou Fenteng Clothing Factory Supplier Evaluation
Hk Flowers Clothing Limited Supplier Evaluation
Hk Flowers Clothing Limited Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Minzhen Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Minzhen Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenqiguodu (Shangqiu) Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenqiguodu (Shangqiu) Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Naisen Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Naisen Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongyang Yihe Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongyang Yihe Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shangrao Menglu Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shangrao Menglu Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Woao Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Woao Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xixi Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xixi Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Haiyun Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Haiyun Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Mofei Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Mofei Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Ouze Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Ouze Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shangqiu Muchu Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shangqiu Muchu Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Kerousi Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Kerousi Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Kanoshi Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Kanoshi Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Jibenzhan Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Jibenzhan Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Linktor New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Linktor New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Ningbo Wantong Electron Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Wantong Electron Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Liaoning Angao Innovative Material Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Liaoning Angao Innovative Material Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xingtai Yiwei Mechanical Seal Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xingtai Yiwei Mechanical Seal Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen King-Sunny Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen King-Sunny Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zheshijia Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zheshijia Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Geshifeng Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Geshifeng Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jingmen Tanmeng Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jingmen Tanmeng Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jh-Mech Enterprises Inc. Supplier Evaluation
Jh-Mech Enterprises Inc. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Beauledo Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Beauledo Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Yibao Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Yibao Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xinyurui Office Supplies Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xinyurui Office Supplies Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Ronghe Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Ronghe Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Binzhou Yan Li Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Binzhou Yan Li Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Easy-Try Cycles (Tianjin) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Easy-Try Cycles (Tianjin) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Rise Automation Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Rise Automation Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Refeng Boiler Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Refeng Boiler Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Columbia Bit Tool (Yangjiang)Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Columbia Bit Tool (Yangjiang)Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Meizhou City Meixian District Pinzhong Auto Parts Factory (Individual Business) Supplier Evaluation
Meizhou City Meixian District Pinzhong Auto Parts Factory (Individual Business) Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Link Sense Intelligent Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Link Sense Intelligent Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan New Printing Paper Products Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Hunan New Printing Paper Products Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026