zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Dongguan Feifan Silicone Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Dongguan Feifan Silicone Products Co., Ltd. is a Guangdong, China-based supplier offering adhesive bras, invisible bra stickers, backless adhesive underwear, front-buckle sticky bras, and disposable underarm sweat pads. The supplier shows strong platform credibility, with 6 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and platform tags including Full Customization, ODM service available, Finished Product Inspection, and 94.9% on-time delivery. Its recent business performance is relatively solid, with 700+ orders and CN¥878.9K+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.5 store rating and 100+ reviews. However, factory area and employee count are not provided, limiting visibility into production scale. This supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ adhesive underwear and related personal-care accessories with customization support, but buyers requiring confirmed large-scale production capacity should request additional factory-size and workforce documentation before committing to larger programs.

Dongguan Feifan Silicone Products Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Company: Dongguan Feifan Silicone Products Co., Ltd.
  • Location: Guangdong, China
  • Factory area: Insufficient Data
  • Employee count: Insufficient Data
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Product range includes adhesive bras, invisible bra stickers, backless adhesive underwear, front-buckle sticky bras, and disposable underarm sweat pads.

Elaboration

The supplier has a defined product focus in adhesive underwear and related personal-use accessories, suggesting specialization rather than a broad, unfocused product catalog. The presence of verified supplier status provides some credibility regarding company existence and supplier identity. However, the absence of factory area and employee number creates a significant information gap when assessing production scale, staffing stability, and capacity for larger-volume orders.

The listed products show low minimum order quantities, such as 10 sets, 30 sets, 30 pairs, and 10 pieces, which may indicate flexibility for smaller buyers or trial orders. However, without confirmed production floor size, equipment information, production lines, or employee count, it is not possible to classify the company as a large-scale manufacturer based solely on the supplied data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier receives credit for verified supplier status and a clear product category focus. However, the most important indicators for Company Strength—factory area, employee count, and production scale—are missing. Because of this, the company cannot be scored as a medium or large stable factory despite having platform verification. The score reflects a supplier with basic confirmed operating credibility but insufficient disclosed capacity data.

Final Score

11 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 6 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Certification / industry tags:
  • Full customization
  • ODM service available
  • Finished product inspection
  • On-time delivery 94.9%

Elaboration

The supplier has a relatively strong platform profile. A 6-year Gold Supplier history indicates established platform presence rather than a newly created supplier account. Trade Assurance support provides a transaction protection mechanism for buyers. Verified supplier status further strengthens platform credibility, while the presence of service and inspection-related tags adds additional operational transparency.

The listed tags cover several important procurement concerns: customization, ODM capability, finished product inspection, and delivery performance. These are relevant credibility indicators on the platform, especially for buyers evaluating suppliers remotely. However, no additional third-party certifications, product compliance certificates, or factory audit details are provided in the dataset, so the evaluation must remain limited to the listed platform credentials.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates strong platform credibility due to 6 years of Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and multiple operational tags. This combination represents a relatively complete trust profile. The score is not placed at the absolute maximum because the data does not include detailed factory audit reports, product compliance certifications, or external certification names.

Final Score

18 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 700+
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥878.9K+
  • Store rating: 4.5
  • Review count: 100+

Elaboration

The supplier shows active recent commercial performance. Over 700 orders in the past six months indicates consistent transaction activity. CN¥878.9K+ in six-month transaction value also suggests a meaningful level of buyer demand on the platform. The store rating of 4.5 is positive, though not at the very highest level, and 100+ reviews provide a reasonable feedback base for buyer reference.

The combination of order count, transaction value, and review volume gives the supplier a stronger business validation than suppliers with limited or no transaction history. However, the data does not include repeat buyer rate, order distribution by product, average order value, or dispute rate, so commercial performance cannot be fully assessed beyond the provided platform metrics.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates stable and relatively strong business traction, especially with 700+ recent orders. The transaction amount is also meaningful, and the rating/review base supports market validation. The score is slightly below the highest range because the store rating is 4.5 rather than exceptionally high, and the review count, while adequate, is not large enough to indicate very broad customer validation.

Final Score

17 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤3h
  • Full customization: listed
  • ODM service available: listed

Elaboration

The supplier provides a response time of no more than three hours, which is acceptable for cross-border procurement communication. It also lists Full Customization and ODM service availability, indicating that it can support buyer-specific requirements beyond standard catalog purchasing.

The service profile is useful for buyers seeking private-label, product adjustment, or customized adhesive underwear solutions. However, the response time does not meet the strongest benchmark of ≤1 hour. Additionally, the dataset does not provide information on design support, sampling time, language capability, dedicated account management, or after-sales responsiveness.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier deserves a strong service score because it supports Full Customization and ODM service and maintains a response time within three hours. However, it does not qualify for the highest service range because the response time is not ≤1 hour, and more detailed service-process information is not available.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 94.9%

Elaboration

The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate of 94.9% is above the 90% threshold, which indicates strong delivery reliability based on the provided platform metric. For procurement teams, this level of performance is generally favorable because it suggests the supplier has been able to meet shipment commitments in most recorded transactions.

However, the dataset does not include lead time ranges, peak-season performance, shipment delay reasons, logistics methods, or historical delivery consistency by order size. Therefore, the evaluation is based strictly on the provided on-time delivery percentage.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 point range. The supplier’s 94.9% performance supports a high delivery score. It is not assigned a perfect score because no additional delivery data is available to confirm performance under larger or more complex order conditions.

Final Score

9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.5
  • Review count: 100+
  • Finished Product Inspection: listed
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Factory area: Insufficient Data
  • Employee count: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a positive customer feedback profile, with a 4.5 store rating and more than 100 reviews. This indicates that buyers have provided a measurable amount of post-transaction feedback. The presence of Finished Product Inspection is an important quality-control indicator, suggesting that the supplier has some form of final inspection process before shipment.

Verified supplier status also adds credibility to the quality assessment, though it should not be treated as a substitute for product compliance certificates, lab testing, or detailed quality-management documentation. The dataset does not provide defect rates, return rates, inspection standards, product test reports, or specific quality certifications, so quality assurance strength cannot be fully confirmed.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier performs well in this category because it combines a good rating, a meaningful review base, Finished Product Inspection, and verified supplier status. The score remains below the top tier because the rating is good but not exceptional, review volume is moderate rather than very large, and detailed quality-control or product compliance documentation is not provided.

Final Score

17 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 11 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 18 / 20
Business Performance 17 / 20
Service Capability 8 / 10
Delivery Performance 9 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 17 / 20
Total Score 80 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

Dongguan Feifan Silicone Products Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking adhesive bras, sticky bra accessories, invisible bra stickers, backless adhesive underwear, and disposable underarm sweat pads, especially where low MOQ purchasing, customization, ODM support, and Trade Assurance are important. The supplier’s 6-year Gold Supplier status, 700+ recent orders, CN¥878.9K+ transaction value, 94.9% on-time delivery rate, and Finished Product Inspection tag support a positive procurement outlook.

Suitable customer types:
- Small to medium buyers testing adhesive underwear categories
- E-commerce sellers requiring low MOQ orders
- Buyers needing customization or ODM service
- Importers prioritizing Trade Assurance and platform-verified suppliers

Main risks:
- Factory area: Insufficient Data
- Employee count: Insufficient Data
- Production scale cannot be fully verified from the provided data
- No product compliance certificates or third-party quality certifications are provided
- Quality assessment relies mainly on platform rating, reviews, and Finished Product Inspection tag

Growth potential:
The supplier shows good commercial traction and platform credibility. If it can provide factory size, workforce details, production capacity, inspection procedures, and relevant product compliance documentation, it may become more suitable for larger-volume or more quality-sensitive procurement programs.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Newsun Silicone Products Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Newsun Silicone Products Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Hongyu Silicone Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Hongyu Silicone Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Huoxi Silicone Rubber Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Huoxi Silicone Rubber Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Xinhuabao Silicone Rubber Components Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Xinhuabao Silicone Rubber Components Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Pingyang Feifan Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Pingyang Feifan Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yangxi Feifan Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yangxi Feifan Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fuzhou Changle District Feifan Knitting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fuzhou Changle District Feifan Knitting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Danling Silicone Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Danling Silicone Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Hands Chain Silicone Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Hands Chain Silicone Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Better Silicone Rubber Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Better Silicone Rubber Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Hengtu Silicone And Rubber Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Hengtu Silicone And Rubber Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Luck Packing Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Luck Packing Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Raiser Packing Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Raiser Packing Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Purigen Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Purigen Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Nianfeng Craft Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Nianfeng Craft Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Bahao Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Bahao Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Ditai Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Ditai Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yonghe Sports Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yonghe Sports Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Qimei Packaging Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Qimei Packaging Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Rambo Auto Parts Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Rambo Auto Parts Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Hubei Anka Special Automobile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Anka Special Automobile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Macroener Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Macroener Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Companion Home Supply Chain Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Companion Home Supply Chain Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongyang Hualian Clothing Factory(Individual Business) Supplier Evaluation
Dongyang Hualian Clothing Factory(Individual Business) Supplier Evaluation
Henan Lavers Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Lavers Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Sun Vision New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Sun Vision New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Canglong Steel Structure Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Canglong Steel Structure Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Baile Lighting Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Baile Lighting Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Anda Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Anda Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangmen Segong Kitchenware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangmen Segong Kitchenware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Jianxinsheng Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Jianxinsheng Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Hengdong Aluminum Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Hengdong Aluminum Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Jinhua New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Jinhua New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Honest Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Honest Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Hanbo Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Hanbo Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Europe Mango New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Europe Mango New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Dasheng Daily Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Dasheng Daily Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Hopestar Sci-Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Hopestar Sci-Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Poling Intelligent Digital Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Poling Intelligent Digital Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Hulang Lighting Electrical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Hulang Lighting Electrical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026