zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Shenzhen Misource New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Shenzhen Misource New Material Technology Co., Ltd. is a Guangdong, China-based supplier with a reported factory area of 4,800+ m² and 50+ staff. The company appears to operate as a small-to-medium production supplier, supported by verified supplier status, 9 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, and platform labels including ODM service availability, response time within 3 hours, and 98.5% on-time delivery. Its listed product range is mainly focused on absorbent pads for seafood, fish, meat, and fresh food packaging, with one listed water ball product. Over the past six months, the supplier recorded 90+ orders and CN¥540.9K+ transaction value, with a 4.7 store rating and 20+ reviews. Based on the available data, this supplier is suitable for buyers seeking food absorbent pad products, moderate transaction validation, flexible MOQ options, and reliable delivery performance. Key limitations include limited review volume and insufficient data on formal product inspection systems or specific quality certifications.

Shenzhen Misource New Material Technology Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory area: 4,800+ m²
- Employees: 50+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Location: Guangdong, China

Elaboration
The supplier has a documented physical production base with 4,800+ m² of factory area and more than 50 employees. This indicates a basic-to-moderate operational scale rather than a large-scale industrial manufacturing base. The verified supplier status provides additional credibility that the company has passed a supplier verification process, although the data does not specify the exact scope or depth of the verification.

Scoring Rationale
The factory size and staff count suggest that the company has established production capability and is not merely a trading entity based on the provided data. However, the scale remains moderate, and there is no data showing multiple production sites, very large workforce, advanced automated capacity, or detailed annual output. Therefore, the supplier fits best within the “medium stable factory” range, but not at the top end of the scale.

Final Score
16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 9 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Platform labels: ODM service available, Response time ≤3h, On-time delivery 98.5%

Elaboration
The supplier has a relatively long Gold Supplier history of 9 years, which strengthens platform credibility. Trade Assurance availability also improves buyer protection during transactions. The supplier is marked as verified, and the platform labels provide additional operational signals related to service, customization, and delivery performance.

Scoring Rationale
A 9-year Gold Supplier record, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status form a strong platform credibility foundation. The compliance credibility is solid from an platform perspective. However, the provided data does not include independent industry certifications, product safety certifications, food-contact compliance documents, or third-party audit details beyond the verified supplier indication. For this reason, the score is high but not maximum.

Final Score
18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 90+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥540.9K+
- Store rating: 4.7
- Reviews: 20+

Elaboration
The supplier has measurable commercial activity over the past six months, with more than 90 orders and transaction value above CN¥540.9K. The 4.7 rating is positive and indicates generally satisfactory buyer experience. However, the review count of 20+ is relatively limited, meaning the public feedback base is not yet extensive.

Scoring Rationale
The order count and transaction amount show active business performance and reasonable market validation. The supplier is not unproven, and the six-month transaction data supports a stable commercial profile. However, compared with suppliers showing very high order volume, larger transaction value, and hundreds or thousands of reviews, this supplier’s business proof remains moderate. The rating is good, but the limited number of reviews prevents a higher score.

Final Score
15 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤3h
- Platform label: ODM service available
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of within 3 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency, though it does not meet the strongest benchmark of response within 1 hour. The ODM service label suggests some customization or product development support. However, the data does not confirm Full Customization capability, design support scope, packaging customization, or engineering assistance.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates functional service capability through acceptable response speed and ODM availability. This supports buyers requiring basic customization or adapted product solutions. However, because response time is not within 1 hour and Full Customization is not confirmed, the service capability should be scored in the normal-to-good range rather than the highest tier.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 98.5%

Elaboration
The supplier reports a 98.5% on-time delivery rate, which is a strong delivery performance indicator. This exceeds the 90% threshold for the highest scoring range under the stated evaluation criteria. Reliable delivery is particularly important for packaging and consumable supply chains where repeated replenishment orders may be required.

Scoring Rationale
Based strictly on the provided on-time delivery rate, the supplier performs strongly in delivery reliability. A 98.5% rate indicates low apparent delivery delay risk within the available platform data. Since the figure is above 90%, the supplier qualifies for the top scoring range for this dimension.

Final Score
10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.7
- Reviews: 20+
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: True, based on verified supplier status

Elaboration
The supplier’s 4.7 store rating is positive and suggests generally favorable customer feedback. However, the number of reviews is only 20+, which limits the statistical strength of the feedback base. The supplier is verified, which supports baseline quality and operational credibility, but the provided data does not confirm Finished Product Inspection, formal quality control systems, food-contact certification, or specific third-party product testing.

Scoring Rationale
The quality feedback profile is acceptable but not comprehensive. A 4.7 rating supports buyer satisfaction, and verified supplier status adds confidence. However, the limited review count and lack of confirmed Finished Product Inspection prevent the supplier from being rated as having a complete quality assurance system. The score therefore reflects good but partially evidenced quality credibility.

Final Score
15 / 20

Total Score

81 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with appropriate due diligence. Shenzhen Misource New Material Technology Co., Ltd. shows strong platform credibility, reliable delivery performance, verified supplier status, and moderate commercial validation. It is especially suitable for buyers sourcing seafood, fish, meat, and fresh food absorbent pads who need a supplier with Trade Assurance, ODM availability, and stable on-time delivery.

The main risks are limited public review volume, insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection, and lack of provided product-specific certifications or detailed quality control documentation. For buyers in food packaging or food-contact applications, additional verification of compliance documents, inspection procedures, and sample testing is recommended before large-volume purchasing.

Overall, the supplier has good growth potential due to its 9-year Gold Supplier history, active recent transactions, verified status, and strong delivery rate. It is best suited for small-to-medium procurement programs, trial orders, and gradually scaled purchasing after quality validation.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Beijing Tongyizhong New Material Technology Corporation Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Tongyizhong New Material Technology Corporation Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Jinlong New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Jinlong New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Yinwang New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Yinwang New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Zehong New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Zehong New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Chuangxin New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Chuangxin New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Marlboro New Material Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Marlboro New Material Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Aorunde New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Aorunde New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Vnovo New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Vnovo New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Baolijia New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Baolijia New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Longyi New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Longyi New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Gmark New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Gmark New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Emf New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Emf New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Yijin New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Yijin New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Eheng New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Eheng New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Kangjiesi New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Kangjiesi New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Sturdyarmor New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Sturdyarmor New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaoxing Symer New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaoxing Symer New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Mino New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Mino New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Ider New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Ider New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Elsky Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Elsky Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Guangdong Detai Air Conditioning Equipment Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Detai Air Conditioning Equipment Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Rainbow Spray Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Rainbow Spray Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Ocan Polymer Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Ocan Polymer Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Ronghong Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Ronghong Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Rayman Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Rayman Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xi'An Toption Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xi'An Toption Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Aquacubic Sanitaryware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Aquacubic Sanitaryware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Yichuang Cosmetics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Yichuang Cosmetics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Chengxi Network Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Chengxi Network Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Neway Rubber & Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Neway Rubber & Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yingda Gift Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yingda Gift Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jiexunda Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jiexunda Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huidong County Jilong Mingteng Shoe Factory Supplier Evaluation
Huidong County Jilong Mingteng Shoe Factory Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Wangtong Locks Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Wangtong Locks Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chongqing Pacton Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chongqing Pacton Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuchang Huashuo Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuchang Huashuo Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Sungnan Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Sungnan Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Farthest Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Farthest Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Taiwei Steel Structure Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Taiwei Steel Structure Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Coolnice Household Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Coolnice Household Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026